James Cartlidge (25414)

This page contains possible times in debates that James Cartlidge may have disclosed an interest.

This match is loose and is likely to include false positives.

2024-02-27: Match score 68%

Initially we will be looking at the interest earned on those assets, but we should definitely be focusing on this across Government

Debate linkRFMI link


2023-11-20: Match score 68%

I strongly congratulate my hon. Friend on becoming Chair of the Defence Committee and I look forward to working with him. I know that, predating his appointment, he had a strong interest in accommodation, and I enjoyed visiting his constituency to look at the accommodation for Brize Norton. I will consider his point and write to him.

Debate linkRFMI link


2024-03-11: Match score 67%

In my hon Friend’s constituency, which I had the pleasure of visiting recently, there are many defence interests, and he has hit the nail on the head

Debate linkRFMI link


2024-07-24: Match score 66%

My right hon Friend’s question is an interesting one

Debate linkRFMI link


2023-12-19: Match score 65%

Absolutely: I can send that message to the families—and, by the way, the hon. Lady has also made an important point in reminding us of the huge generosity that we have shown by taking in so many of those families, a number of whom are in my constituency. I can certainly reassure her, on the basis of what has happened literally in the last week. We should be judged not by words but by action, having created a maritime coalition that will support the crucial strategic interests of the Black sea. I am talking about access to the Black sea, security, and the ability to get grain in and out. We have also continued to provide those crucial weapons, including air defence systems.

Debate linkRFMI link


2024-02-28: Match score 65%

I am grateful to my hon. Friend. He is a champion of the rotary industry, which supports so many jobs in his constituency. It is thanks to the championing of that interest by him and other colleagues who have constituency interests in the procurement that it is moving forward as it is. Obviously it is a competition, so we have to be even-handed and recognise that all three companies have their strengths, but I would emphasise two points about that procurement. First, there is a strong emphasis on UK industrial contribution, particularly in design work. That is the most important work, and it is what we want to see in the UK.

Debate linkRFMI link


2024-07-18: Match score 64%

Turning to defence matters, may I welcome the new foreign affairs and defence ministerial teams to their positions? As the shadow Foreign Secretary, my right hon. Friend the Member for Sutton Coldfield (Mr Mitchell), said, we will work with them where it is in the national interest—especially on supporting Ukraine for as long as it takes—as they did when they were in opposition. We welcome the cross-party spirit in which the Secretary of State for Defence set out his plans for a strategic defence review. We look forward to working with Lord Robertson, for whom I have the greatest respect, in a constructive and collaborative manner.

Debate linkRFMI link


2024-02-27: Match score 64%

The hon. Lady’s excellent point about mines follows on from the point made by my right hon. Friend the Member for Chingford and Woodford Green (Sir Iain Duncan Smith). I am happy to go away and look into that to see what we are able to say about what we are doing. She will appreciate that there is also the issue of naval mines. I believe we will be looking at that, but there is some sensitivity within the maritime capability coalition; I will look into the issue further. I cannot say that there is a button I can press to stop those countries that are providing those munitions, but we know Putin keeps some rather interesting company and that we, as democracies, need to stand together to ensure we support Ukraine in this fight.

Debate linkRFMI link


2024-02-19: Match score 61%

I know that there has been a lot of interest, following the deployment in the Red sea, in what the lessons are

Debate linkRFMI link