Daniel Zeichner (25386)

This page contains possible times in debates that Daniel Zeichner may have disclosed an interest.

This match is loose and is likely to include false positives.

2024-07-30: Match score 67%

I was interested to hear the observations from Opposition Members after their 14 years of opportunity to do the things that they are now keen to do, but we will pick up on many of their suggestions

Debate linkRFMI link


2024-04-19: Match score 66%

I will not go through the amendments in detail one by one, because the hon. Member for Southend West dealt very effectively with many of those points and I found myself in agreement with her on all of them, but there are bigger issues involved in the way in which we register and track dogs. All this is complicated, and I know from talking to vets in my shadow ministerial role that they worry about being dragged into ownership disputes as a consequence. I think it is part of a wider discussion, and I am certainly not opposed to our having that discussion, but I agree with the hon. Lady that there is a danger of our being drawn into delays and also into diminishing the scope of the Bill, which I think would be disappointing. Labour will therefore not support the amendments tabled by the hon. Member for Christchurch.

Debate linkRFMI link


2024-01-19: Match score 66%

I urge interested Members to look up the very good discussion that took place

Debate linkRFMI link


2024-07-30: Match score 63%

I thank everyone who has contributed to an interesting and informed debate

Debate linkRFMI link


2024-03-04: Match score 62%

Like many others, they have, I suspect, been following this debate with interest, because their issues and concerns are typical of those of many across the country

Debate linkRFMI link