division_name: [S2M-5510] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-5510</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-01-31f.htm">bulletin on 2007-01-31</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-5510 Mr Mark Ruskell: Scottish WaterâThat the Parliament notes growing pressure for Scottish Water to be privatised; further notes the substantial improvements that have been made in Scottish Waterâs performance, all of this having been achieved while keeping Scottish Water in the public sector; notes the Water Industry Commissionâs lack of a wider social and environmental remit and its use of a regulatory model more suited to a private utility than to a public one; considers that improving the service, upgrading the water and sewerage system, reducing leakages and ensuring effective regulation should not centre on short-term efficiency measures but on the quality and safe delivery of services in the long term, and affirms its commitment to keeping Scottish Water under public ownership and control. Supported by: Mark Ballard* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-5510&exclude=&from=2007-02-01&to=2007-02-01">search for this motion (S2M-5510) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that motion S2M-5510, in the name of Mark Ruskell, on Scottish Water, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>