division_name: [S1M-2606] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-2606</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-01-15f.htm">bulletin on 2002-01-15</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-2606 Mr Kenny MacAskill: Scotland's Railways-That the Parliament notes that the Executive's neglect and lamentable lack of vision and strategy for Scotland's railways has contributed to a deterioration of rail services in Scotland to the point at which they have become amongst the worst in Europe; further notes that the Strategic Rail Authority's new strategic plan offers nothing new for Scotland; believes that Scottish railways must be fully controlled by, and accountable to, the Scottish Parliament, and therefore calls upon the Executive to take responsibility for delivering a strategy for the running and operation of Scotland's rail network. 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-01-16f.htm">bulletin on 2002-01-16</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S1M-2606 Scotland's Railways (lodged on 14 January 2002) Tricia Marwick* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-01-17f.htm">bulletin on 2002-01-17</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S1M-2606 Scotland's Railways (lodged on 14 January 2002) Michael Russell* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-2606&exclude=&from=2002-01-16&to=2002-01-16">search for this motion (S1M-2606) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that motion S1M-2606, in the name of Kenny MacAskill, as amended, on Scotland's railways, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>