division_name: Lords Amendment No. 110
motion: <p pid="a.57.1/1" pwmotiontext="lines">110 Clause 251, page 148, line 29, at beginning insert "Subject to section (Proceedings brought under section 251: defence of respondent),"</p>
  
  <p pid="a.57.1/2" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">The Commons disagreed to this amendment for the following reason:</p>
  
  <p pid="a.57.1/3" pwmotiontext="lines">110A Because it is not appropriate to provide any such exceptions, the House having reached its decision without the opportunity for debate.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.57.2/1" pwmotiontext="moved">rose to move that this House do not insist on their Amendment No. 110 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 110A but do propose the following amendment in lieu thereof&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.57.2/2" pwmotiontext="moved">110BClause 2, page 2, line 21, at end insert&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.57.2/3" pwmotiontext="moved">"(6) The guidance must indicate that the reduction in crime is in general best secured by means of criminal investigations and criminal proceedings."</p>
  
  <p pid="a.68.4/1" pwmotiontext="divided">Their Lordships divided: Contents, 126; Not-Contents, 44.</p>