division_name: [S2M-1960] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-1960</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-11-05f.htm">bulletin on 2004-11-05</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-1960 Cathy Jamieson: The Fire (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Fire (Scotland) Bill. Supported by: Hugh Henry* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-11-08f.htm">bulletin on 2004-11-08</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-1960 Cathy Jamieson: The Fire (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Fire (Scotland) Bill. Supported by: Hugh Henry 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-11-15f.htm">bulletin on 2004-11-15</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S2M-1960 Cathy Jamieson: The Fire (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Fire (Scotland) Bill. Supported by: Hugh Henry 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-1960&exclude=&from=2004-11-18&to=2004-11-18">search for this motion (S2M-1960) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The third question is, that motion S2M-1960, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the general principles of the Fire (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>