division_name: [S3M-679.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-679.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-10-25f.htm">bulletin on 2007-10-25</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S3M-679.2 Ross Finnie: Free Personal CareâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-679) in the name of Mary Scanlon, leave out from "with concern" to end and insert "the judgment of Lord Macphail on personal care and its consequences; notes with disappointment the SNP Governmentâs handling of this issue and recognises the need for urgent clarity to allay the concerns of older people and their families as well as to give clear guidance to service providers; calls on the Scottish Government to take the appropriate steps to provide this clarification as soon as possible, including a statement to the Parliament on the issue, and further calls on the Scottish Government to take all steps necessary to ensure that local authorities do not find that in providing free care for self-funders they are acting ultra vires." Supported by: Dr Richard Simpson* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-679.2&exclude=&from=2007-10-25&to=2007-10-25">search for this motion (S3M-679.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-679.2, in the name of Ross Finnie, which seeks to amend motion S3M-679, in the name of Mary Scanlon, on free personal care, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>