division_name: [S2M-2893.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-2893.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-06-02f.htm">bulletin on 2005-06-02</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-2893.1 Miss Annabel Goldie: Antisocial BehaviourâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-2893) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from "welcomes" to end and insert "notes with regret that the Scottish Crime Survey indicated that three out of every four crimes are never reported to the police, indicating a lack of confidence from the public; notes the commencement of the Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Act 2004 but, in doing so, recognises that, without an adequate enforcement regime, measures included within the Act cannot work; ultimately believes that only when there is a greatly increased police presence on our streets, following zero-tolerance policing methods and re-engaging with communities, will we see a reduction in crime and antisocial behaviour, and therefore calls on the Scottish Executive to increase resources available to the police along with an improving accountability to ensure an improvement in the deterrence and detection of crime." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-2893.1&exclude=&from=2005-06-02&to=2005-06-02">search for this motion (S2M-2893.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S2M-2893.1, in the name of Annabel Goldie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2893, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>