division_name: Identity Cards Bill
motion: <p class="" pid="d.717.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That the Bill be recommitted to a Select Committee.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="d.717.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">Members hold many serious reservations about the Bill, and even more reservations are held by people outside the House. That is not reason in itself to recommit to a Select Committee; indeed, there is opportunity under the normal Committee and Report process for us to consider the principled reasons, but the Bill, almost more than any other, depends on the practicalities. If it does not work, if it costs vastly more than the Government say it will cost and if conclusions can be drawn about the scope of the information stored on identity cards, the enabling Bill&#8212;on repeated occasions, the Minister has stressed that it is enabling legislation&#8212;has completely different connotations and the House ought seriously to consider them.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="d.719.3/1" pwmotiontext="yes">Question put, pursuant to <phrase class="standing-order" code="74" pwmotiontext="yes" title="Re-committal of Bill">Standing Order No. 74 (Re-committal of Bill)</phrase>:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="d.719.3/2" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 243, Noes 326.</p>