division_name: [S3M-2002.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-2002.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-08/bb-05-29f.htm">bulletin on 2008-05-29</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-2002.2 Jim Hume: Common Agricultural Policy Health CheckâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-2002) in the name of Richard Lochhead, insert at end "considers that any increase in compulsory modulation must be offset by a corresponding reduction in voluntary modulation to ensure that Scottish producers are not put at a competitive disadvantage within the European Union; further considers that Scotland, with its high proportion of large farm units, must not be disadvantaged by proposals for progressive modulation or capping; believes that, in light of rapidly escalating food and fuel costs, the Scottish Rural Development Programme should be reviewed, with the production of food and food security considered as a key priority, and recognises the correlation between economic activity on the ground and delivery of environmental benefits for all. 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-2002.2&exclude=&from=2008-05-29&to=2008-05-29">search for this motion (S3M-2002.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The next question is, that amendment S3M-2002.2, in the name of Jim Hume, which seeks to amend motion S3M-2002, in the name of Richard Lochhead, on the common agricultural policy health check, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>