division_name: Special Educational Needs and Disability Bill [Lords] - Needs of the individual child
motion: <p>As amended in the Standing Committee, considered. 
   <p>Brought up, and read the First time. 
  
  <p>
   I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
  <p> 
  
    The new clause is meant as a probing amendment, which the Royal National Institute for the Blind and Sense were keen to have debated on Report. They want to highlight the need for mobility and independence education for visually impaired and multi-sensory impaired children to be treated as, I underline, a special educational provision, which must be provided by local education authorities if specified in a statement, rather than as a form of non-educational provision that LEAs may arrange. The RNIB and Sense want the revised code of practice on special educational needs to set out clearly that important principle.
  <p>Motion and clause, by leave, withdrawn .
   <p>Brought up, and read the First time. 
  <p>
   I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
  <p> 
     Mr. Deputy Speaker  (Sir Alan Haselhurst):   
   With this it will be convenient to discuss amendment No. 1, in clause 1, page 1, line 15, leave out "efficient" and insert "effective".
  <p>Question put,  That the new clause be read a Second time:--
  <p>The House divided:  Ayes 102, Noes 236.
   