division_name: [S1M-3602.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3602.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-11-21f.htm">bulletin on 2002-11-21</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-3602.2 Fergus Ewing: Scottish Executive Response to the Foot-and-Mouth Disease InquiriesâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-3602) in the name of Ross Finnie, leave out from "and welcomes" to end and insert "; welcomes the fact that the Scottish Parliament was able to deal with the foot-and-mouth crisis more efficiently than it was tackled in England; endorses many of the proposals contained within the Scottish Executive response to the inquiries but considers that insufficient progress has been made to tighten import controls; believes that emergency vaccination should be deployed in any future outbreak, that there should be a total transfer to Scotland of all necessary power to handle any such outbreak and that the continued application of the 20-day rule is creating significant difficulties for Scottish farmers and crofters, and considers that the restrictions on access to the countryside were retained for far too long and had a severe impact upon the rural economy of many parts of Scotland."
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3602.2&exclude=&from=2002-11-21&to=2002-11-21">search for this motion (S1M-3602.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The fifth question is, that amendment S1M-3602.2, in the name of Fergus Ewing, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3602, in the name of Ross Finnie, on the Scottish Executive response to foot-and-mouth disease inquiries, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>