division_name: New Clause 1 &#8212; Appeals
motion: <p class="" pid=".573.4/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid=".573.4/2" pwmotiontext="yes">The new clause would effectively introduce some control over the very open wording of clause 2. To show how wide-ranging that clause is, one could do worse than quote the promoter of the Bill in Committee on <phrase class="date" code="2004-06-07">7 June</phrase>. It was all too brief a sitting on <phrase class="date" code="2004-06-07">Monday 7 June</phrase>. All that was said about clause 2 was:</p>
  
  <p pid=".584.3/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Question put,</i> That the clause be read a Second time:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid=".584.3/2" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 1, Noes 21.</p>