division_name: [S3M-5572.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-5572.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-10/bb-01-21f.htm">bulletin on 2010-01-21</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-5572.2 Ross Finnie: Prescription Charges and NHS Spending Priorities with Particular Reference to Health VisitorsâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-5572) in the name of Mary Scanlon, leave out from "the money" to end and insert "it is unjustifiable for the Scottish Government to continue to make consultantsâ distinction and clinical excellence awards in 2010-11 including under its new Scottish Clinical Leadership and Excellence Awards scheme to be introduced on 1 April 2010, and further believes that the money saved from both of these measures would be better spent on other priorities." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-5572.2&exclude=&from=2010-01-21&to=2010-01-21">search for this motion (S3M-5572.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> Amendment S3M-5572.1, in the name of Jackie Baillie, and amendment S3M-5572.2, in the name of Ross Finnie, are pre-empted. The next question is, that motion S3M-5572, in the name of Mary Scanlon, on prescription charges, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>