division_name: [S3M-3674.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-3674.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-03-12f.htm">bulletin on 2009-03-12</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-3674.3 Stewart Stevenson: Aberdeen CrossrailâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-3674) in the name of Alison McInnes, leave out from "which would" to end and insertÂ "which is being tackled incrementally by the introduction of new services from Inverurie, the opening of Laurencekirk station, the re-timetabling of other services and the bringing forward of work on Kintore station; believes that this incremental approach delivers early and cost-effective benefits to rail services across Aberdeen; recognises that the introduction of additional stops increases journey times and can, in certain circumstances, reduce the viability of services overall; welcomes the real progress being made by the Scottish Government after years of inaction, and looks forward to further rail investment in the north as announced in the Strategic Transport Projects Review." Supported by: John Swinney* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-3674.3&exclude=&from=2009-03-12&to=2009-03-12">search for this motion (S3M-3674.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The first question is, that amendment S3M-3674.3, in the name of Stewart Stevenson, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3674, in the name of Alison McInnes, on the Aberdeen crossrail, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>