division_name: Civil Aviation Bill &#8212; New Clause 5 &#8212; Reporting of Banned Airlines
motion: <p class="" pid="c.103.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="c.103.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">Hon. Members might be wondering why the new clause has been proposed now and why the subject has not come up in previous debates. A series of crashes made August 2005 one of the worst months in recent years for aviation accidents: on <phrase class="date" code="2005-08-14">14 August</phrase> a Helios Airways flight crashed, killing 121 people; on <phrase class="date" code="2005-08-16">16 August</phrase> a Colombian plane operated by West Caribbean Airways crashed, killing 160 people; and on <phrase class="date" code="2005-08-23">23 August</phrase>, a Boeing 737 crashed on an internal flight in Peru, reportedly killing 40 people. That is why we are moving the new clause today.</p>
  
  <p pid="c.107.3/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Question put,</i> That the clause be read a Second time:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="c.107.3/2" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 56, Noes 290.</p>