division_name: Energy Bill &#8212; <i>Commons Reason</i>
motion: <p class="italic" pid="a.783.1/1" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">Motion A</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="a.783.1/2" pwmotiontext="unrecognized"> Moved by Baroness Verma</p>
  
  <p pid="a.783.1/3" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">That this House do not insist on its Amendment 105, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 105A.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.783.1/4" pwmotiontext="unrecognized"><b>105:</b> Page 125, line 3, at end insert&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.783.1/5" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">&#8220;(iii) substantial pollution abatement equipment dealing with oxides of sulphur, oxides of nitrogen, heavy metal emissions or particles is fitted to the generating station.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.783.1/6" pwmotiontext="unrecognized"><b>Commons Disagreement and Reason</b></p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="a.783.1/7" pwmotiontext="bill">The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No 105 for the following reason&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.783.1/8" pwmotiontext="unrecognized"><b>105A</b></p>
  
  <p pid="a.783.1/9" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">Because it is inappropriate for the fitting of pollution abatement equipment to cause the emissions limit duty to apply to existing generating stations.</p>