division_name: Consumer Rights Bill &#8212; <i>Report (2nd Day)</i>
motion: <p pid="a.701.3/1" pwmotiontext="unrecognized"><b><i>Schedule 2: Consumer contract terms which may be regarded as unfair</i></b></p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="a.701.3/2" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">Amendment 29</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="a.701.3/3" pwmotiontext="unrecognized"> Moved by Lord Clement-Jones</p>
  
  <p pid="a.701.3/4" pwmotiontext="unrecognized"><b>29:</b> Schedule 2, page 58, line 2, at end insert&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.701.3/5" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">&#8220;20A (1) A term which has the object or effect of permitting a trader engaged in the provision of fixed broadband internet access or mobile internet services to block, restrict or otherwise hinder the access of a consumer to any lawful electronic communications network or electronic communications service on the basis of an unreasonable or unusual definition of &#8220;internet access&#8221;, &#8220;data&#8221;, &#8220;webaccess&#8221; or similar word or phrase.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.701.3/6" pwmotiontext="lines">(2) Nothing in this prohibition shall affect filters for the purpose of child protection.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.701.3/7" pwmotiontext="lines">(3) &#8220;Electronic communications network&#8221; or &#8220;electronic communications service&#8221; shall have the same meaning as provided in section 32 of the Communications Act 2003.&#8221;</p>