division_name: [S1M-1865.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-1865.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-04-26f.htm">bulletin on 2001-04-26</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-1865.1 Malcolm Chisholm: Hepatitis CâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-1865) in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, leave out from "calls" to end and insert "notes the report produced by the Executive in October 2000 on Hepatitis C and Heat Treatment of Blood Products for Haemophiliacs in the mid 1980s; further notes the continuing deliberations of the Health and Community Care Committee on this issue and the recent ruling of the English High Court in the case of a number of NHS patients who have been infected with hepatitis C through blood transfusions, and encourages the Executive to examine constructively the implications of this ruling." Supported by: Susan Deacon* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-1865.1&exclude=&from=2001-04-26&to=2001-04-26">search for this motion (S1M-1865.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The first question is, that amendment S1M-1865.1, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1865, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, on hepatitis C, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>