division_name: Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill &#8212; New Clause &#8212; Application of Part 1
motion: <p pid=".1046.1/1" pwmotiontext="yes">Question accordingly agreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid=".1046.1/2" pwmotiontext="yes">Lords amendment disagreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid=".1046.1/3" pwmotiontext="yes">Government amendment (a) in lieu of Lords amendment No. 1 agreed to.</p>
  
  <p pid=".1046.1/4" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Lords Reason:</i> No. 3B</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid=".1046.1/5" pwmotiontext="yes">The Lords insist on their Amendment 3 to which the Commons have disagreed, for the following Reason&#8212;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid=".1046.1/6" pwmotiontext="yes">Because regional spatial strategies should be based on the views of local communities</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid=".1046.1/7" pwmotiontext="yes">Motion made, and Question put, That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in the said amendment.&#8212;[Keith Hill.]</p>
  
  <p pid=".1046.1/8" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 235, Noes 141.</p>