division_name: [S2M-5510.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-5510.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-02-01f.htm">bulletin on 2007-02-01</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-5510.2 Sarah Boyack: Scottish WaterâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-5510) in the name of Mr Mark Ruskell, leave out from first "notes" to end and insert "welcomes the substantial improvements that have been made in Scottish Waterâs performance, all of this having been achieved while keeping Scottish Water in the public sector; recognises that the objectives set by ministers for 2006-14, which properly recognise the social and environmental priorities of the Scottish Executive, will not only deliver further improvements in drinking water quality, environmental protection, and customer service but also relieve development constraints, upgrade the water and sewerage system and reduce leakages; recognises that the role of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland is to assess the lowest reasonable overall costs of delivering the objectives that ministers have specified, taking account of appropriate external benchmarks, and affirms that Scottish Water operating in the current regulatory framework will go on to deliver further improvements in this vital public service." Supported by: Ross Finnie* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-5510.2&exclude=&from=2007-02-01&to=2007-02-01">search for this motion (S2M-5510.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The fourth question is, that amendment S2M-5510.2, in the name of Sarah Boyack, which seeks to amend motion S2M-5510, in the name of Mark Ruskell, on Scottish Water, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>