division_name: [S2M-4268] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-4268</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-04-21f.htm">bulletin on 2006-04-21</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-4268 Cathy Jamieson: Police, Public Order and Criminal Justice (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Police, Public Order and Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-04-24f.htm">bulletin on 2006-04-24</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-4268 Cathy Jamieson: Police, Public Order and Criminal Justice (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Police, Public Order and Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-05-22f.htm">bulletin on 2006-05-22</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-4268 Cathy Jamieson: Police, Public Order and Criminal Justice (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Police, Public Order and Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-4268&exclude=&from=2006-05-25&to=2006-05-25">search for this motion (S2M-4268) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There is one question to be put as a result of today's business. The question is, that motion S2M-4268, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the Police, Public Order and Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>