division_name: [S2M-3585.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-3585.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-11-17f.htm">bulletin on 2005-11-17</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-3585.3 Shiona Baird: Waste StrategyâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-3585) in the name of Ross Finnie, leave out from âimplementingâ to end and insert âimproving Scottish recycling and composting rates but acknowledges that, in spite of these improvements, Scotland still lags behind many of our European partners and that the overall volume of waste being created continues to rise; notes that there is a wide variation in recycling rates across Scottish local authorities and strongly believes that access to comprehensive recycling facilities should not be a postcode lottery; commends the efforts of the public in rising to the challenge of recycling an increasing proportion of their waste in spite of often poor facilities and lack of clear information; expresses concern that many Scottish businesses and community groups engaged in recycling have found their efforts thwarted by inappropriate levels of regulation and heavy financial costs, and believes that a policy of zero waste, bringing environmental, economic and social benefits, is the only truly sustainable way to tackle Scotlandâs throwaway culture.â 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-3585.3&exclude=&from=2005-11-17&to=2005-11-17">search for this motion (S2M-3585.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The seventh question is, that amendment S2M-3585.3, in the name of Shiona Baird, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3585, in the name of Ross Finnie, on the waste strategy, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>