division_name: [S2M-3895.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-3895.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-02-22f.htm">bulletin on 2006-02-22</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-3895.1 Fiona Hyslop: Scottish Schools (Parental Involvement) BillâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-3895) in the name of Peter Peacock, insert at end "but, in so doing, notes that parental involvement in the management of schools as institutions is not the same as parentsâ involvement in their own childrenâs education which should be the focus of policy, and regrets that the Scottish Executive has failed to provide detail about its proposals for the role of parents in the appointment of headteachers and senior staff before introducing the Bill or the debate and vote on Stage 1 of the Bill, noting that this is now the most contentious part of the Bill since the Executive latterly introduced proposals for elected parent councils similar to elected school boards into the Bill." Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-3895.1&exclude=&from=2006-02-22&to=2006-02-22">search for this motion (S2M-3895.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are six questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-3895.1, in the name of Fiona Hyslop, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3895, in the name of Peter Peacock, on the Scottish Schools (Parental Involvement) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>