division_name: [S1M-1357.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-1357.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-00/bb-11-16f.htm">bulletin on 2000-11-16</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-1357.1 Mr John Swinney: Implications of the Chancellor's Pre-Budget Statement for the Scottish Executive-As an amendment to motion (S1M-1357) in the name of Henry McLeish, insert at end "but regrets that at the end of the budget period the Chancellor will be investing less of the nation's wealth in public services than when the Conservative Party left office." Supported by: Andrew Wilson*, Mr Kenneth Gibson*, Mr Andrew Welsh*, Ms Sandra White* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-1357.1&exclude=&from=2000-11-16&to=2000-11-16">search for this motion (S1M-1357.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The seventh question is, that amendment S1M-1357.1, in the name of John Swinney, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1357, in the name of Henry McLeish, on the implications of the chancellor's pre-budget statement for the Scottish Executive, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>