division_name: [S1M-3149.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3149.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-05-28f.htm">bulletin on 2002-05-28</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-3149.2 Roseanna Cunningham: Alternatives to Custody-As an amendment to motion (S1M-3149) in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, leave out from "commends" to end and insert "regrets the failure of the Scottish Executive adequately to develop a range of high quality alternatives to custody which fit the changing pattern of offending behaviour across Scotland; recognises the importance of programmes which are well-resourced and available across every jurisdiction in Scotland, and believes that a greater element of restorative justice should be introduced into the Scottish criminal justice system whether dealing with adults or young offenders." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3149.2&exclude=&from=2002-05-28&to=2002-05-28">search for this motion (S1M-3149.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The third question is, that amendment S1M-3149.2, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3149, in the name of Jim Wallace, on alternatives to custody, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>