division_name: Orders of the Day &#8212; Further Education and Training Bill [L ords]
motion: <p class="" pid="b.994.3/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.994.3/2" pwmotiontext="yes">Our further education system has seen unprecedented investment and reform in recent years, and continued reform is vital if the United Kingdom is to become a country with world-class skills by 2020.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.1003.1/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, To leave out from "That" to the end of the Question, and to add instead thereof:</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b.1003.1/2" pwmotiontext="yes">"That this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Further Education and Training Bill <i> [Lords]</i> because it will introduce yet another expensive reorganisation of the learning and skills councils, further entrenching the management of vocational training through a regional structure; it will grant the Learning and Skills Council draconian new powers to dismiss college governors, principals and senior managers; and despite the recommendations of the Leitch Review of Skills it fails to address the UK's relatively poor performance in intermediate level vocational skills, the growing problem of young people not in education, employment or training, the declining numbers of learners in apprenticeships at all levels, and profound doubts about the timetable for the introduction of the new 14-19 specialised Diplomas."</p>
  
  <p pid="b.1073.1/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i> Question put, </i>That the amendment be made:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="b.1073.1/2" pwmotiontext="yes"><i> The House divided:</i> Ayes 137, Noes 296.</p>