division_name: [S1M-2941.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-2941.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-03-27f.htm">bulletin on 2002-03-27</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-2941.1 Mr David Davidson: TourismâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-2941) in the name of Mike Watson , leave out from "welcomes" to end and insert "recognises the distinct lack of performance by the Scottish Executive in assisting the tourism industry to be internationally competitive and create more jobs; considers that, after five months of consultation, the Tourism Framework for Action 2002-05 spells out the obvious and provides no real vision for focusing on the real challenges faced by the different regions in Scotland in order to promote tourism opportunities through a targeted marketing approach, and believes that it is entirely unacceptable that the only role the Minister for Tourism, Culture and Sport will play is to head a Steering Group while the Executive takes responsibility for a mere 10% of the actions outlined in the framework without allowing business input into the strategy behind the action plan. 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-2941.1&exclude=&from=2002-03-27&to=2002-03-27">search for this motion (S1M-2941.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that amendment S1M-2941.1, in the name of David Davidson, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2941, in the name of Mike Watson, on tourism, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>