division_name: [S2M-2166.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-2166.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-12-16f.htm">bulletin on 2004-12-16</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-2166.3 Mr Jamie McGrigor: Tourism - Ambitions for ScotlandâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-2166) in the name of Patricia Ferguson, leave out from "approves" to end and insert: "urges the Scottish Executive to pursue a more ambitious target for growth in light of the aggressive policies being pursued by competitor countries; appreciates that long-term growth can only be achieved by ensuring that the marketing of Scotland in UK and overseas tourism markets is further strengthened and that the businesses that comprise the tourism and hospitality sectors are freed from the Executiveâs policies which are hampering business growth and enterprise throughout Scotland; regrets the uncertainty and consequent damage caused to the industry by the Executiveâs handling of the tourism network restructuring process; further regrets the potential loss of local knowledge and expertise that may result from the centralisation of the tourism network, and calls on the Executive to ensure that both the local tourist information centres and funding for the new tourism hubs are adequately protected once the new network commences in April." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-2166.3&exclude=&from=2004-12-16&to=2004-12-16">search for this motion (S2M-2166.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S2M-2166.3, in the name of Jamie McGrigor, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2166, in the name of Patricia Ferguson, on tourism, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>