division_name: [S2M-3766.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-3766.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-12-22f.htm">bulletin on 2005-12-22</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-3766.1 Phil Gallie: "Torture Flights" on Scottish SoilâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-3766) in the name of Frances Curran, leave out from "considers" to end and insert "supports the UN Convention Against Torture, of which the United Kingdom is a signatory; believes that there is never any justification for torture; welcomes the judgement by the Law Lords that evidence obtained under torture was inadmissible in court and was also inadmissible in a Special Immigration Appeals Commission case; notes the allegations in the press that CIA rendition flights have refuelled in Scotland; trusts that the Foreign Secretaryâs assurances that such flights have not landed in Scotland are true, and calls for the Scottish Executive to detail what communications it has had with the Foreign Office over this matter." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-3766.1&exclude=&from=2005-12-22&to=2005-12-22">search for this motion (S2M-3766.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S2M-3766.1, in the name of Phil Gallie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3766, in the name of Frances Curran, on "torture flights" on Scottish soil, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>