division_name: [S1M-1027.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-1027.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-00/bb-06-22f.htm">bulletin on 2000-06-22</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-1027.1 Peter Peacock: McCrone ReportâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-1027) in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, leave out from "calls upon" to end and insert "welcomes the Executiveâs approach to establish genuine consultation and partnership through constructive dialogue and mature consideration of the recommendations of the McCrone Report, and calls upon the Executive to maintain its progress towards the objective of securing a modern and flexible mechanism for determining the professional conditions of service for teachers in Scotlandâs schools as a critical determinant in establishing a world class reputation for the Scottish education system". Supported by: Mr Sam Galbraith* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-1027.1&exclude=&from=2000-06-22&to=2000-06-22">search for this motion (S1M-1027.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The first question is, that amendment S1M-1027.1, in the name of Peter Peacock, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1027, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, on the McCrone report, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>