division_name: Opposition Day &#8212; [2nd Allotted Day] &#8212; Local Government Financing
motion: <p class="" pid="a.722.3/2" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move,</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.722.3/3" pwmotiontext="yes">That this House regrets the decision of the Government to introduce &#163;1.165 billion of cuts to local government funding in England in the current financial year; regrets the Liberal Democrat members of the Government supporting cuts they opposed during the general election campaign; notes the promise in the Coalition Agreement to "ensure that fairness is at the heart of those decisions so that all those most in need are protected"; regrets that this programme of cuts fails to meet this test of fairness, as they fall disproportionately on the hardest-pressed communities; notes with concern the principle set out by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State on <phrase class="date" code="2010-06-10">10 June</phrase> that "those in greatest need ultimately bear the burden of paying off the debt"; condemns the failure of the Secretary of State to tell the House or local authorities where &#163;504 million of cuts to funding will fall; further regrets the failure to consult local government on the allocation of the cuts; further notes with regret that the Government's further decisions on the Future Jobs Fund, housing and support for neighbourhood policing will weaken the ability of local councils to shape and deliver services in their areas; regrets the failure to make any progress on implementing the previous administration's commitment to Total Place, enabling local authorities to deliver real efficiency savings and contribute to reducing the deficit while protecting frontline services; and resolves that decisions affecting local government spending should be based on the principles of fairness, protection of frontline services and promotion of growth.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="a.735.0/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move an amendment, to leave out from "House" to the end of the Question and add:</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.735.0/2" pwmotiontext="yes">"regrets the doubling of council tax under the last government, its cuts to services such as rubbish collections and its legacy of public debt; expresses concern that the prospect of paying for &#163;70 billion a year in debt interest represents a total of more than is currently raised from council tax, business rates, stamp duty and inheritance tax combined; welcomes the new Government's immediate support for frontline services by protecting &#163;29 billion of formula grant, removing &#163;1.2 billion of ring-fencing and abolishing red tape such as the Comprehensive Area Assessment; backs the support for hard-working families and pensioners through a council tax freeze and the abolition of the previous government's plans for new bin taxes; further welcomes the scrapping of the unfair ports tax which threatened to harm Britain's whole manufacturing sector; supports the reductions in business rates for small firms; acknowledges the significant efficiency savings already delivered by local government but believes that there is further scope for savings through joint working, professional procurement practices and radical town hall transparency; and asserts the importance of delivering local economic growth to all local communities across the country, assisted by new financial incentives, and of giving new freedoms to councils to allow them to focus their help on local priorities and those most in need.".</p>
  
  <p pid="a.825.9/1" pwmotiontext="yes"> Question put (<phrase class="standing-order" code="31(2)" pwmotiontext="yes">Standing Order No. 31(2)</phrase>), That the original words stand part of the Question.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.825.9/2" pwmotiontext="yes"><i> The House divided:</i> Ayes 243, Noes 335.</p>