division_name: [S2M-1090.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-1090.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-03-25f.htm">bulletin on 2004-03-25</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-1090.1 Michael Matheson: Protecting Communities - Reforming the Role of Non-Jury Courts-As an amendment to motion (S2M-1090) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from "considers" to end and insert "supports the need to have a fair, effective and efficient summary criminal justice system; welcomes the recent report by Sheriff Principal McInnes; acknowledges the note of dissent within the report, and believes that future changes to the summary justice system must impart confidence to everyone: victims, witnesses, accused persons, court users and, above all, the communities they serve. 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-1090.1&exclude=&from=2004-03-25&to=2004-03-25">search for this motion (S2M-1090.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The sixth question is, that amendment S2M-1090.1, in the name of Michael Matheson, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1090, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on protecting communities and reforming the role of non-jury courts, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>