division_name: Pensions Bill (Programme) (No. 3) &#8212; Clause 2 &#8212; Entitlement to state pension at full or reduced rate
motion: <p class="" pid="b.560.4/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 1.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.560.4/2" pwmotiontext="yes">We are on the home straight of the Pensions Bill. It has been all the way through this House and their lordships&#8217; House, and we have come back to it today to deal with amendments that, with one exception, make it a better Bill. I am grateful to my noble Friends Lord Freud and Lord Bates who, from the ministerial Benches, took the Bill through another place. I am also grateful to all my colleagues who have contributed to the Bill, and to peers on both sides of the House of Lords who have made insightful contributions and improved the Bill in a number of ways.</p>
  
  <p pid="b.571.3/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Question put, </i>That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 1.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="b.571.3/2" pwmotiontext="yes">The House divided:</p>
  
  <p pid="b.571.3/3" pwmotiontext="yes">Ayes 274, Noes 198.</p>