division_name: Non-domicile Tax Status
motion: <p class="indent" pid="b278.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">That there be laid before this House, no later than <phrase class="date" code="2023-02-28">28 February</phrase> 2023, a copy of the Treasury analysis related to the effect of the abolition of the non-domicile tax status on the public revenue referred to by the Chancellor of the Exchequer in evidence to the Treasury Committee on <phrase class="date" code="2023-11-23">23 November</phrase> 2022 together with any other document or analysis relating to that matter prepared for the Chancellor&#8217;s consideration since <phrase class="date" code="2023-10-14">14 October</phrase> 2022.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b279.5/2" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;to make sure that wealthy foreigners pay as much tax in this country as possible&#8221;,</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b281.3/4" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;I want to make sure that anything you do in terms of the non-dom tax regime does not mean you lose more than you gain.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b286.2/6" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;hundreds of millions pounds&#8221;.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b286.2/9" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;non-doms are good for the economy&#8221;.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b288.0/2" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;a copy of the Treasury analysis related to the effect of the abolition of the non-domicile tax status on the public revenue.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b293.0/8" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;such a charge could discourage men and women&#8212;doctors and nurses, business men and women&#8212;from coming to this country&#8230;and we do not want to turn them away.&#8221;&#8212;[Official Report, <phrase class="date" code="2023-10-09">9 October</phrase> 2007; Vol. 464, c. 171.]</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b293.0/10" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;I think if you abolish the whole status then probably it ends up costing Britain money because there will be some people who will then leave the country.&#8221;</p>