division_name: [S2M-3837.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-3837.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-01-19f.htm">bulletin on 2006-01-19</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-3837.3 Mr Mark Ruskell: Air Route Development FundâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-3837) in the name of Tavish Scott, leave out from âendorsesâ to end and insert âquestions the success of the Air Route Development Fund (ARDF) in bringing sustainable development benefits to Scotland; further questions whether economic advantages have flowed to the Scottish economy from the ARDF; supports the development of an international regime that reduces overall aviation emissions; notes that promoting expansion of aviation undermines existing emissions targets and that projected growth in aviation would necessitate cessation of economic activity in other sectors in order to achieve targets; notes that the net cost of aviation to the Scottish economy was Â£1.4 billion in 2004 and that the United Kingdom accounts for 87% of tourist visits to Scotland; supports work to improve rail journey times between Scotland and London in order to reduce the reliance on domestic short-haul flights but notes the lack of progress in this respect, and condemns the further use of public funds for the ARDF.â Supported by: Mark Ballard* Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-3837.3&exclude=&from=2006-01-19&to=2006-01-19">search for this motion (S2M-3837.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The third question is, that amendment S2M-3837.3, in the name of Mark Ruskell, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3837, in the name of Tavish Scott, on the air route development fund, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>