division_name: [S2M-1033.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-1033.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-03-11f.htm">bulletin on 2004-03-11</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-1033.2 Roseanna Cunningham: The Historic Environment, A Valuable Resource for ScotlandâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-1033) in the name of Mr Frank McAveety, insert at end "; regrets that, notwithstanding the work done by individuals and organisations, there remain serious concerns about (a) a lack of both resources and information and (b) the failure to sufficiently protect, conserve, interpret and promote Scotlandâs historic environment and endorses the call for a review of the historic environment backed up by a regular audit to measure progress." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-1033.2&exclude=&from=2004-03-11&to=2004-03-11">search for this motion (S2M-1033.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S2M-1033.2, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1033, in the name of Frank McAveety, on the historic environment&#8212;a valuable resource for Scotland, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>