division_name: [S3M-1599] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-1599</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-08/bb-03-19f.htm">bulletin on 2008-03-19</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-1599 Bill Aitken: The Home Detention Curfew Licence (Prescribed Standard Conditions) (Scotland) (No. 2) Order 2008âThat the Parliament recommends that nothing further be done under the Home Detention Curfew Licence (Prescribed Standard Conditions) (Scotland) (No. 2) Order 2008 (SSI 2008/125). 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-08/bb-03-25f.htm">bulletin on 2008-03-25</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S3M-1599 Bill Aitken: The Home Detention Curfew Licence (Prescribed Standard Conditions) (Scotland) (No. 2) Order 2008âThat the Parliament recommends that nothing further be done under the Home Detention Curfew Licence (Prescribed Standards Conditions) (Scotland) (No. 2) Order 2008 (SSI 2008/125). 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-1599&exclude=&from=2008-03-27&to=2008-03-27">search for this motion (S3M-1599) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are six questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that motion S3M-1599, in the name of Bill Aitken, on the Home Detention Curfew Licence (Prescribed Standard Conditions) (No 2) (Scotland) Order 2008 (SSI 2008/125), be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>