division_name: [S3M-4067.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-4067.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-05-07f.htm">bulletin on 2009-05-07</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-4067.1 Ken Macintosh: School DisciplineâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-4067) in the name of Elizabeth Smith, leave out from "notes" to end and insert "supports all appropriate measures to uphold the rights of teachers to teach and pupils to learn in a disciplined environment; notes the significant steps made by the previous administration to achieve this including the setting up of the Discipline Task Group, the removal of restrictions on head teachers to exclude pupils if necessary, the use of special units, support for teacher training, reduced class sizes and more classroom assistants, and calls on the Scottish Government to address the recent decline in teacher numbers and support staff, including behaviour support staff, and to work in partnership with key stakeholders to put in place a framework for a discipline code in every school incorporating rights and responsibilities for head teachers, teachers, parents and pupils." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-4067.1&exclude=&from=2009-05-07&to=2009-05-07">search for this motion (S3M-4067.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-4067.1, in the name of Ken Macintosh, which seeks to amend motion S3M-4067, in the name of Elizabeth Smith, on school discipline, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>