division_name: [S2M-1116.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-1116.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-03-31f.htm">bulletin on 2004-03-31</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-1116.2 Mr Jim Wallace: The Effect of Strip Stamps on the Whisky Industry-As an amendment to motion (S2M-1116) in the name of Murdo Fraser, Leave out from ", thereby adversely" to end and insert "; and therefore calls on HM Treasury to engage in further discussion with the industry on the impact of these measures with a view to reaching a satisfactory outcome which deals with tax fraud and would lead to the decision being reversed, failing which to ensure that a comprehensive package of compensation measures is put in place to minimise the impact on the industry. Supported by: Lewis Macdonald* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-1116.2&exclude=&from=2004-03-31&to=2004-03-31">search for this motion (S2M-1116.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are 11 questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-1116.2, in the name of Jim Wallace, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1116, in the name of Murdo Fraser, on the effect of strip stamps on the whisky industry be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>