division_name: Prevention of Terrorism Bill
motion: <p pid="b.508.1/2" pwmotiontext="notmoved">[<i>Amendments Nos. 48 to 54 not moved.</i>]</p>
  
  <p pid="b.508.1/3" pwmotiontext="negatived">Clause 2 negatived.</p>
  
  <p pid="b.508.1/4" pwmotiontext="considered">Clause 3 [<i>Duration and renewal of non-derogating control orders</i>]:</p>
  
  <p pid="b.509.0/1" pwmotiontext="moved">moved Amendment No. 55:</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b.509.0/2" pwmotiontext="moved">Page 4, line 36, at beginning insert&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="b.509.0/3" pwmotiontext="moved">(A1) The Secretary of State may make a control order against an individual if he&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="b.509.0/4" pwmotiontext="moved">(a) has reasonable grounds for suspecting that the individual is or has been involved in terrorism-related activity; and</p>
  
  <p pid="b.509.0/5" pwmotiontext="moved">(b) considers that it is necessary, for purposes connected with protecting members of the public from a risk of terrorism, to make a control order imposing obligations on that individual.</p>
  
  <p pid="b.509.0/6" pwmotiontext="moved">(A2) The Secretary of State may make a control order against an individual who is for the time being bound by a control order made by the court only if he does so&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="b.509.0/7" pwmotiontext="moved">(a) after the court has determined that its order should be revoked; but</p>
  
  <p pid="b.509.0/8" pwmotiontext="moved">(b) while the effect of the revocation has been postponed for the purpose of giving the Secretary of State an opportunity to decide whether to exercise his own powers to make a control order against the individual.</p>
  
  <p pid="b.509.0/9" pwmotiontext="moved">(A3) A control order made by the Secretary of State is called a non-derogating control order."</p>
  
  <p pid="b.509.2/1" pwmotiontext="moved">moved, as an amendment to Amendment No. 55, Amendment No. 56:</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b.509.2/2" pwmotiontext="moved">Line 2, leave out "Secretary of State" and insert "court"</p>
  
  <p pid="b.509.4/1" pwmotiontext="considered">On Question, Whether Amendment No. 56, as an amendment to Amendment No. 55, shall be agreed to?</p>
  
  <p pid="b.509.4/2" pwmotiontext="divided">Their Lordships divided: Contents, 249; Not-Contents, 119.</p>