division_name: [S1M-921.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-921.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-00/bb-06-01f.htm">bulletin on 2000-06-01</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-921.1 Fiona Hyslop: Tackling Rough Sleeping in Glasgow and across ScotlandâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-921) in the name of Ms Wendy Alexander, leave out from "welcomes" to "recognises" and insert "notes the commitment of the Scottish Executive to achieving its aim that no-one should have to sleep rough by the end of this session of the Parliament; notes that this commitment has been moved back from an original deadline of 2002, and believes that the challenge funding nature of the Rough Sleepers Initiative aligned with a general fall in housing resources is hindering the ability of the Executive to meet its target of ending rough sleeping; however recognises". Supported by: Mr Lloyd Quinan*, Tricia Marwick* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-921.1&exclude=&from=2000-06-01&to=2000-06-01">search for this motion (S1M-921.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that amendment S1M-921.1, in the name of Fiona Hyslop, which seeks to amend motion S1M-921, in the name of Wendy Alexander, on tackling rough sleeping in Glasgow and across Scotland, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>