division_name: [S2M-3329] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-3329</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-09-22f.htm">bulletin on 2005-09-22</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-3329 Tricia Marwick on behalf of the Waverley Railway Bill (Scotland) Committee: Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill - Preliminary StageâThat the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill and that the Bill should proceed as a Private Bill. Supported by: Gordon Jackson* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-09-26f.htm">bulletin on 2005-09-26</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-3329 Tricia Marwick on behalf of the Waverley Railway Bill (Scotland) Committee: Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill - Preliminary StageâThat the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill and that the Bill should proceed as a Private Bill. Supported by: Gordon Jackson 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-3329&exclude=&from=2005-09-28&to=2005-09-28">search for this motion (S2M-3329) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that motion S2M-3329, in the name of Tricia Marwick, that the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill and that the bill should proceed as a private bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>