division_name: Judicial Review and Courts Bill - <i>Report</i> &#8212; Amendment 4
motion: <p class="italic" pid="b1731.1/1" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">Moved by Lord Etherton</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="b1731.1/2" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">4: Clause 1, page 2, leave out lines 24 to 32Member&#8217;s explanatory statementThis amendment would remove the presumption that where a suspended or prospective-only quashing order would offer adequate redress, such a quashing order should be made in preference to an ordinary quashing order.</p>
  
  <p pid="b1731.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">Ayes 159, Noes 134.</p>