division_name: [S3M-4057] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-4057</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-05-06f.htm">bulletin on 2009-05-06</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S3M-4057 Kenny MacAskill: Sexual Offences (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Fergus Ewing* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-05-11f.htm">bulletin on 2009-05-11</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S3M-4057 Kenny MacAskill: Sexual Offences (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Fergus Ewing 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-06-08f.htm">bulletin on 2009-06-08</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S3M-4057 Kenny MacAskill: Sexual Offences (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Fergus Ewing 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-4057&exclude=&from=2009-06-10&to=2009-06-10">search for this motion (S3M-4057) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are just two questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that motion S3M-4057, in the name of Kenny MacAskill, on the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>