division_name: [S3M-5808] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-5808</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-10/bb-02-24f.htm">bulletin on 2010-02-24</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-5808 Robert Brown: JusticeâThat the Parliament is concerned at the decision of the Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police to issue Taser guns to 30 frontline police officers following a three-day training course; recognises the considerable concerns about the safety of Tasers raised by Amnesty International and Epilepsy Scotland among others; notes the view of the First Minister that this is an operational matter for chief constables, requiring no involvement of Scottish ministers; further notes that it was the Home Secretary who had responsibility for signing off the issuing of Tasers to more frontline police officers following a similar pilot in England and Wales; recognises that the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland (ACPOS) currently subscribes to guidance on the deployment of firearms and less lethal weapons issued by the Home Office and the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO); believes that three days of training is not sufficient for officers with no previous training or experience of handling firearms, and further believes that extending the use of Tasers beyond firearms officers represents a shift in policy, not an operational decision, and requires ministerial sanction following debate in the Parliament. 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-5808&exclude=&from=2010-02-25&to=2010-02-25">search for this motion (S3M-5808) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that motion S3M-5808, in the name of Robert Brown, on justice, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>