division_name: [S1M-437.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-437.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-00/ab-01-20f.htm">bulletin on 2000-01-20</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-437.1 Mrs Lyndsay McIntosh: Tackling Drug Misuse in ScotlandâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-437) in the name of Angus MacKay, leave out from "welcomes" to end and insert "while welcoming the Executiveâs cross-cutting approach and the efforts being made to reverse the tragic level of drug deaths and drug misuse in Scotland, notes that the present framework for dealing with drug abuse is exceptionally bureaucratic and complicated and calls upon the Scottish Executive to appoint a Minister with sole responsibility for drugs within existing Ministerial numbers and budgets to help streamline this system, making it more easily understood and accessible to the people it seeks to serve. Â  
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-437.1&exclude=&from=2000-01-20&to=2000-01-20">search for this motion (S1M-437.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The second question is that amendment S1M-437.1, in the name of Mrs Lyndsay McIntosh, which seeks to amend motion S1M-437, in the name of Angus MacKay, on tackling drug misuse in Scotland, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>