division_name: [S2M-2640.4 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-2640.4</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-03-24f.htm">bulletin on 2005-03-24</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   * S2M-2640.4 Scott Barrie: Nuclear WeaponsâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-2640) in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, leave out from âis opposedâ to end and insert âacknowledges that defence and national security are matters reserved to the UK Parliament and acknowledges, in the words of the Governmentâs Strategic Defence Review, âthe goal of the global elimination of nuclear weaponsâ; welcomes the many moves taken to reduce the number of weapons in the world including UK support for the convention to ban anti-personnel landmines, end-user certificates and other restrictions on the arms trade and the significant reductions in the UKâs nuclear weapons stockpile; notes the position of the Scottish National Party, in favour of withdrawal from the United Kingdom and NATO; recognises that withdrawal from the United Kingdom and from NATO would put at risk 25,000 direct MoD jobs in Scotland, 6,000 more dependent on MoD contracts and 12,000 more jobs supported by the military presence, and notes that between 2000 and 2004 the MoD placed 2,500 contracts in Scotland worth around Â£2 billion, all of which would be at risk under the SNP.â Supported by: Mr Alasdair Morrison* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-2640.4&exclude=&from=2005-03-24&to=2005-03-24">search for this motion (S2M-2640.4) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S2M-2640.4, in the name of Scott Barrie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2640, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, on nuclear weapons, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>