division_name: Water Bill [HL]
motion: <p pid="a.155.3/1" pwmotiontext="moved">moved Amendment No. 37:</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.155.3/2" pwmotiontext="moved">After Clause 30, insert the following new clause&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.155.3/3" pwmotiontext="moved">"APPEALS AGAINST ENFORCEMENT ORDERS</p>
  
  <p pid="a.155.3/4" pwmotiontext="moved">(1) Section 21 of the WIA (validity of enforcement orders) is amended as follows.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.155.3/5" pwmotiontext="moved">(2) At the end of paragraph (a) of subsection (1), there is omitted the word "or".</p>
  
  <p pid="a.155.3/6" pwmotiontext="moved">(3) After paragraph (b) of subsection (1), there is added&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.155.3/7" pwmotiontext="moved">"(c) that the making or confirmation of the order was based on an error of law or fact; or</p>
  
  <p pid="a.155.3/8" pwmotiontext="moved">(d) that in the circumstances of the case, the making or confirmation of the order was not reasonable."</p>
  
  <p pid="a.155.3/9" pwmotiontext="moved">(4) For subsection (2) there is substituted&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.155.3/10" pwmotiontext="moved">"(2) On any such application, the High Court may, if satisfied that any of the grounds set out in subsection (1) above are proved&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.155.3/11" pwmotiontext="moved">(a) quash the order or any provision of the order; or</p>
  
  <p pid="a.155.3/12" pwmotiontext="moved">(b) vary the whole of the order, or any part of the order whether the application relates to that part of the order or not.""</p>
  
  <p pid="a.158.1/1" pwmotiontext="considered">On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 37) shall be agreed to?</p>
  
  <p pid="a.158.1/2" pwmotiontext="divided">Their Lordships divided: Contents, 123; Not-Contents, 120.</p>