division_name: [S1M-1026.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-1026.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-00/bb-06-22f.htm">bulletin on 2000-06-22</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-1026.2 Mr Alasdair Morrison: Petrol and Diesel PricesâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-1026) in the name of Mr Kenny MacAskill, leave out from first "notes" to end and insert "recognises concern about the impact of fuel prices especially in rural, highland and islands areas where public transport alternatives are more difficult to provide; recognises that fuel duty is a reserved matter; welcomes the investigation by the Enterprise and Lifelong Learning Committee into the bulk purchase of fuel for remote areas; welcomes the progress made by the Scottish Executive in implementing a comprehensive integrated transport strategy and investing in public transport projects across Scotland; in particular notes support for rural public transport services and the network for petrol stations in rural Scotland, as well as measures to sustain lifeline air and ferry links, including the Highlands and Islands; and further notes that the current budget for the fuel duty rebate would have no impact on Treasury receipts but would be a cost to the current budget for Scottish public services. 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-1026.2&exclude=&from=2000-06-22&to=2000-06-22">search for this motion (S1M-1026.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The third question is, that amendment S1M-1026.2, in the name of Alasdair Morrison, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1026, in the name of Kenny MacAskill, on petrol and diesel prices, be agreed to. Are we <place-holder colnum="772"/> agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>