division_name: [S1M-1868.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-1868.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-04-26f.htm">bulletin on 2001-04-26</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-1868.1 Bruce Crawford: Rural TransportâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-1868) in the name of Sarah Boyack, leave out from "welcomes" to end and insert "recognises the crucial role an integrated and modern transport infrastructure can play in improving economic performance and quality of life in rural areas; expresses deep concern that increases in expenditure on Scotlandâs transport infrastructure will rise at only half the level planned for England; calls upon the Executive to improve the strategic overview and infrastructure/funding delivery mechanisms, and regrets the complacency demonstrated by the Executive in failing to deliver the solutions needed to meet the very real problems being faced in rural Scotland as a result of inadequate transport provision." Supported by: Mr Andrew Welsh*, Alasdair Morgan*, Mr Duncan Hamilton*, Irene McGugan* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-1868.1&exclude=&from=2001-04-26&to=2001-04-26">search for this motion (S1M-1868.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The fifth question is, that amendment S1M-1868.1, in the name of Bruce Crawford, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1868, in the name of Sarah Boyack, on rural transport, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>