division_name: [S2M-2298.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-2298.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-01-26f.htm">bulletin on 2005-01-26</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   * S2M-2298.1 Christine Grahame:Older PeopleâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-2298) in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, leave out from second ârecognisesâ to end and insert âfor example, as role models, carers and volunteers; recognises the progress that has been made through policies such as free personal care, the central heating programme and the commitment to national free bus travel by 2006; considers, however, that the state pension is inadequate for a basic living standard and requires to be supplemented by the means-tested pension credit which some 30% of pensioners fail to claim; notes that one in five pensioners live in poverty, with some 70% in council tax poverty, and that excess winter mortality rates are three times higher in Scotland than in Germany and Sweden, and asserts that, without an increase in the powers of the Parliament to deliver a citizenâs pension providing a decent standard of living which will bring security, dignity, independence and choice, improvements to the lives of Scotlandâs elderly can only be at the margins.â 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-2298.1&exclude=&from=2005-01-26&to=2005-01-26">search for this motion (S2M-2298.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are 16 questions to put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-2298.1, in the name of Christine Grahame, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2298, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on older people, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>