division_name: Lords Amendment
motion: <p pid="a.574.6/1" pwmotiontext="lines">3 Page 1, line 11, at end insert&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.574.6/2" pwmotiontext="quot">"(3A) The RSS must include sub-regional plans for all parts of the region in accordance with geographical boundaries defined by the RPB.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.574.6/3" pwmotiontext="lines">(3B) The sub-regional plans referred to in subsection (3A) shall be prepared by the authorities falling within section 4(1) if their area or any part of their area is in the defined sub-region." The Commons disagree to this amendment for the following reason&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.574.6/4" pwmotiontext="lines">3A Because it is not appropriate to create more than one tier of regional spatial strategy.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.576.0/1" pwmotiontext="moved">rose to move Amendment No. 3B, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 3 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 3A, leave out "not".</p>
  
  <p pid="a.580.2/1" pwmotiontext="considered">On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 3B) shall be agreed to?</p>
  
  <p pid="a.580.2/2" pwmotiontext="divided">Their Lordships divided: Contents, 132; Not-Contents, 116.</p>