division_name: [S2M-4270] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-4270</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-04-21f.htm">bulletin on 2006-04-21</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-4270 Malcolm Chisholm: Planning etc. (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill. Supported by: Johann Lamont* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-04-24f.htm">bulletin on 2006-04-24</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-4270 Malcolm Chisholm: Planning etc. (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill. Supported by: Johann Lamont 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-05-15f.htm">bulletin on 2006-05-15</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-4270 Malcolm Chisholm: Planning etc. (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill. Supported by: Johann Lamont 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-4270&exclude=&from=2006-05-17&to=2006-05-17">search for this motion (S2M-4270) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that motion S2M-4270, in the name of Malcolm <place-holder colnum="25725"/> Chisholm, on the general principles of the Planning etc (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>