division_name: [S3M-173.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-173.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-06-14f.htm">bulletin on 2007-06-14</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S3M-173.1 Sarah Boyack: Carbon OffsettingâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-173) in the name of Robin Harper, leave out from "and that any role" to end and insert "or indirectly; notes the crucial role that transport policy must play in meeting carbon reduction targets and therefore calls on the Scottish Executive to ensure that potential carbon reduction is a central consideration in the evaluation and prioritisation of transport infrastructure projects; reaffirms support for a balanced and sustainable transport policy with the bulk of investment being targeted towards reducing unnecessary journeys and congestion, widening transport choices by providing high-quality and affordable public transport options and support for walking and cycling; further notes the Executiveâs intention to introduce carbon offsetting, and calls on ministers to consult widely on the applicability and robustness of such schemes, demonstrating that carbon offsetting is additional to rather than a substitute for the direct or indirect planned reduction of carbon emissions." Supported by: Des McNulty* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-173.1&exclude=&from=2007-06-14&to=2007-06-14">search for this motion (S3M-173.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The next question is, that amendment S3M-173.1, in the name of Sarah Boyack, which seeks to amend motion S3M-173, in the name of Robin Harper, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>