division_name: [S3M-3214.4 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-3214.4</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-01-15f.htm">bulletin on 2009-01-15</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-3214.4 Jeremy Purvis: Forth CrossingâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-3214) in the name of John Swinney, leave out from "and welcomes" to end and insert "; condemns the actions of the Scottish Government in bringing before the Parliament a proposal for the Forth Replacement Crossing (FRC) that has no agreed funding package; notes that under the Scottish Governmentâs plans "a significant number of other very deserving capital projects will have to be displaced to make room for the FRC", and therefore calls on the Scottish Government to bring before the Parliament immediately a prioritised list of capital projects between 2009 and 2016." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-3214.4&exclude=&from=2009-01-15&to=2009-01-15">search for this motion (S3M-3214.4) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-3214.4, in the name of Jeremy Purvis, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3214, in the name of John Swinney, on the Forth crossing, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>