division_name: [S2M-61] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-61</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-03/bb-05-27f.htm">bulletin on 2003-05-27</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-61 Malcolm Chisholm: The Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (Scotland) Order 2003 and the Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (No.2) (Scotland) Order 2003âThat the Parliament agrees that the Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (Scotland) Order 2003 (SSI 2003/244) and the Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (No.2) (Scotland) Order 2003 (SSI 2003/245) be approved. Supported by: Mr Tom McCabe* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-61&exclude=&from=2003-05-28&to=2003-05-28">search for this motion (S2M-61) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There is one question to be put as a result of today's business. The question is, that motion S2M-61, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on the Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (Scotland) Order 2003 and the Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning) (West Coast) (No 2) (Scotland) Order 2003 be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>