division_name: [S3M-2863.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-2863.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-08/bb-11-13f.htm">bulletin on 2008-11-13</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S3M-2863.1 Nicola Sturgeon: Health FundingâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-2863) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from "condemns" to end and insert "notes that the Scottish Governmentâs spending plans are set against the background of the 2007 spending review settlement from the UK Treasury that represents the lowest increase for Scotland since devolution; recognises that the NHS has received a fair share of the financial settlement and that the Scottish Government is increasing spending on health in Scotland; further recognises that in this context it is right that the NHS should strive to make sure that resources are spent as efficiently as possible; commends the NHSâs record in achieving efficiency savings linked to good quality care; welcomes the Scottish Governmentâs decision to continue the practice whereby all efficiency savings generated by the NHS will be retained by the NHS for local reinvestment in frontline services, and condemns the Labour Party, which instituted efficiency savings while in government but has irresponsibly attacked them in opposition." Supported by: Shona Robison* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-2863.1&exclude=&from=2008-11-13&to=2008-11-13">search for this motion (S3M-2863.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-2863.1, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, which seeks to amend motion S3M-2863, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on health funding, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>