division_name: [S1M-3422] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3422</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-09-25f.htm">bulletin on 2002-09-25</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-3422 David Mundell: Impact on Transport of the Comprehensive Spending ReviewâThat the Parliament recognises that increased investment in transport infrastructure is essential to providing the best business environment to generate growth and investment in Scotland; regrets that since Labour came to power in Scotland in 1997 there has been a failure to deliver any meaningful infrastructure or public transport improvements; further regrets that the Scottish Executive continues to prefer spin and wish-lists to costed plans and timescales for delivery, and calls on the Executive to provide full details, including the cost and timetable, for completion of each commitment outlined in the recent Spending Review which included the Scottish Passenger Rail Franchise, rail links to Glasgow and Edinburgh airports, public transport improvements across Central Scotland, A8 and A80 motorway upgrades, improvements to the existing trunk road network and tackling the congestion problems in Aberdeen. 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3422&exclude=&from=2002-09-26&to=2002-09-26">search for this motion (S1M-3422) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that motion S1M-3422, in the name of David <place-holder colnum="14248"/> Mundell, on the impact on transport of the comprehensive spending review, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>