division_name: [S2M-1960.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-1960.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-11-18f.htm">bulletin on 2004-11-18</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-1960.2 Mr Kenny MacAskill: The Fire (Scotland) BillâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-1960) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, insert at end, " but, in so doing, recognises that the Fire Service has served Scotland and its communities well and has done so with firefighters, management, employers and local authorities working in partnership and therefore expresses concern about the proposed abolition of the Scottish Central Fire Brigade Advisory Council and its replacement with a non-statutory body, in conjunction with increased ministerial powers allowing for Scottish Executive action without a forum for proper debate and discussion, at a time when there is concern over the retention of control rooms and other aspects of the service." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-1960.2&exclude=&from=2004-11-18&to=2004-11-18">search for this motion (S2M-1960.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are five questions to be put. The first question is, that amendment S2M-1960.2, in the name of Kenny MacAskill, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1960, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the general principles of the Fire (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>