division_name: Justice &#8212; New Clause 10 &#8212; Impact of the Spending Round 2013 on tax revenue
motion: <p class="" pid="a.807.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="a.807.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">The Opposition&#8217;s new clause 10 challenges the Chancellor to publish, within six months of Royal Assent, a review of the impact of last week&#8217;s spending review announcements on tax receipts. Should the Government agree to undertake such a review, as we hope they will, we suspect that its conclusions would be pretty short, given the Chancellor&#8217;s comprehensive failure to deliver the economic boost that this country so desperately needs. It was a dead duck of a spending review, and it was even more disappointing, given the context in which it was made. The Chancellor did not want to come to the House to announce a spending review last week, but he was forced to announce a further &#163;11.5 billion of spending cuts in 2015-6. Why? Because his economic plan has utterly and categorically failed.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.826.4/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Question put, </i>That the clause be read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="a.826.4/2" pwmotiontext="yes">The House divided:</p>
  
  <p pid="a.826.4/3" pwmotiontext="yes">Ayes 234, Noes 303.</p>