division_name: [S3M-1152.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-1152.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-08/bb-01-17f.htm">bulletin on 2008-01-17</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-1152.2 Lewis Macdonald: EnergyâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-1152) in the name of Jim Mather, leave out from "notes" to end and insert "supports the further development of a Scottish energy strategy, in partnership with the UK Government, which delivers a mixed energy supply and a focus on energy efficiency to meet our energy needs, secure sustainable economic growth and tackle climate change; believes that the Scottish Government should work towards more ambitious targets for generating electricity from renewable technologies; believes that Scotland needs the full range of renewables to be developed including biomass, marine and local combined heat and power technologies; believes that the investment in the grid and the costs of transmitting electricity should continue to be shared by consumers across Great Britain; believes that, while there are ongoing concerns about different sources of energy generation, we should not rule out any single energy source, as doing so may risk both the security of our electricity supply and thousands of jobs across Scotland, and calls on Scottish ministers to work in partnership with UK ministers on addressing our future energy needs." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-1152.2&exclude=&from=2008-01-17&to=2008-01-17">search for this motion (S3M-1152.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that amendment S3M-1152.2, in the name of Lewis Macdonald, which seeks to amend motion S3M-1152, in the name of Jim Mather, on energy, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>