division_name: [S3M-5110.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-5110.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-11-04f.htm">bulletin on 2009-11-04</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S3M-5110.2 John Scott: Scotlandâs National ParksâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-5110) in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, insert at endÂ "while also welcoming the reduction in the size of the boards of the National Park Authorities, thereby producing greater efficiencies by way of reducing running costs, and emphasising that the proposed National Parks Strategy group must have a clear timescale of operation and well defined sense of purpose in its objectives." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-5110.2&exclude=&from=2009-11-04&to=2009-11-04">search for this motion (S3M-5110.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-5110.2, in the name of John Scott, which also seeks to amend motion S3M-5110, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, on Scotland's national parks, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>