division_name: [S1M-1941] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-1941</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-05-17f.htm">bulletin on 2001-05-17</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-1941 Mr Jim Wallace: Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Iain Gray* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-05-21f.htm">bulletin on 2001-05-21</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S1M-1941 Mr Jim Wallace: Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Iain Gray 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-05-29f.htm">bulletin on 2001-05-29</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S1M-1941 Mr Jim Wallace: Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Iain Gray 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-1941&exclude=&from=2001-05-30&to=2001-05-30">search for this motion (S1M-1941) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The second question is, that motion S1M-1941, in the name of Jim Wallace, which seeks agreement that the Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> I hear a no from Mr Gallie. There will be a division.</p></p>