division_name: [S2M-974] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-974</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-03-01f.htm">bulletin on 2004-03-01</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-974 Cathy Jamieson: Civil Contingencies Bill - UK Legislation-That the Parliament agrees the principle of a single statutory framework for civil protection across the UK, as set out in the Civil Contingencies Bill, and agrees that the relevant provisions in the Bill should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-974&exclude=&from=2004-03-04&to=2004-03-04">search for this motion (S2M-974) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The third and last question is, that motion S2M-974, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the Civil Contingencies Bill, which is UK legislation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>