division_name: [S2M-5104] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-5104</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-11-08f.htm">bulletin on 2006-11-08</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-5104 Colin Fox: Housing Stock TransferâThat the Parliament calls on the Scottish Executive to embark on a programme of council house building; believes that the chronic shortage of affordable new homes has led to a huge increase in house prices in Scotland; notes that the average cost of a new home is now Â£130,000 and thus excludes more than one third of Scots from owning their own homes; demands that the UK Treasury releases the funds already identified to provide the necessary social housing that local circumstances demand; believes that tenants across Scotland have repeatedly rejected housing stock transfer, seeing it as plain and simple privatisation; believes in the fullest democratic control and management of council homes by tenants; welcomes the decision of Midlothian Council to build 1,000 new houses; calls on the tenants of both Highland and Inverclyde councils to follow the example of council tenants in Edinburgh, Stirling and Renfrewshire and reject privatisation of their housing stock; believes that the promises made to Glasgow tenants by Glasgow Housing Association have not been kept, and believes that stock transfer, the Executiveâs flagship housing policy, is now in tatters. Supported by: Carolyn Leckie*, Frances Curran* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-5104&exclude=&from=2006-11-09&to=2006-11-09">search for this motion (S2M-5104) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that motion S2M-5104, in the name of Colin Fox, on housing stock transfer, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>