division_name: [S1M-1656.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-1656.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-02-15f.htm">bulletin on 2001-02-15</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-1656.1 Mr Jack McConnell: Future of Scottish EducationâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-1656) in the name of Michael Russell, leave out from "which could result in" to end and insert "; believes that world class education is essential to give every child the best possible start in life and is critical to the future prosperity of Scotland; welcomes the clear vision that puts the interests of the child at the centre of the improvement of Scottish education embodied in the Standards in Scotlandâs Schools etc. Act 2000; and recognises the clear priority which the Executive has given to raising standards and promoting ambition for all." Supported by: Nicol Stephen* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-1656.1&exclude=&from=2001-02-15&to=2001-02-15">search for this motion (S1M-1656.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The third question is, that amendment S1M-1656.1, in the name of Jack McConnell, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1656, in the name of Michael Russell, on the future of Scottish education, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>