division_name: Protecting Steel in the UK
motion: <p class="indent" pid="f235.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">That this House recognises the need to decarbonise steel production; appreciates the pride that local communities have in their historic steelworks; regrets that the Government has pushed through plans for decarbonising steel in the UK which will result in thousands of steelworkers losing their jobs and risk leaving the UK as the first developed country in the world without the capacity to produce primary steel; further regrets that the Government has failed to produce an industrial strategy which could have included a plan for the whole steel sector; believes that primary steel is a sovereign capability and is therefore concerned about the impact that the Government&#8217;s plans could have on national security; also believes that steel production can have a bright future in the UK; therefore calls on the Government to work with industry and workers to achieve a transition that secures jobs and primary steelmaking for decades to come; and further calls on the Secretary of State for Business and Trade to report to Parliament by <phrase class="date" code="">27 February 2024</phrase> with an assessment of the impact on the UK of the loss of primary steel production capabilities.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="f240.1/3" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;The question for Tata and the UK Government is this&#8212;do we want to be a nation that makes goods, or a nation that imports them from heavily polluting countries? It is not too late for Tata and the UK Government to think again and change course, but time is&#8230;running out. If they fail to take a different path now, the people of South Wales will never forgive them, and history won&#8217;t forgive them either. There is so much at stake for all of us.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="f248.0/6" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;It is an absolute disgrace that Tata Steel, and the UK Government, appear intent on pursuing the cheapest instead of the best plan for our industry, our steelworkers and our country.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="f248.0/9" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;The UK&#8217;s industrial policy&#8230;has been characterised by frequent policy reversals and announcements, driven by political cycles&#8221;,</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="f248.0/11" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;multiple&#8230;public bodies, departments and levels of government&#8230;responsible for delivery.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="f248.0/16" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;The government needs to invest in British industry in order to defend workers and communities as well as our industrial base and our national security. Instead, they are giving Tata hundreds of millions of pounds to fund their plan to cut jobs, cut capacity and give more business to their plants in other countries, like India and the Netherlands. How is that acceptable?&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="f250.4/4" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;for national security reasons alone, we must ensure that we retain the capability to make virgin steel in this country&#8221;.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="f250.4/6" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;obviously, we need a place for virgin steel, and that is in her constituency.&#8221;&#8212;[Official Report, <phrase class="date" code="">18 September 2023</phrase>; Vol. 737, c. 1125.]</p>