division_name: [S1M-334.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-334.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-99/ab-12-02f.htm">bulletin on 1999-12-02</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-334.2 Roseanna Cunningham: EqualitiesâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-334) in the name of Jackie Baillie, leave out from "welcomes" to end and insert "recognises the fundamental importance of equality of opportunity in Scotland both now and for the future and therefore regrets that legislative competence in this area remains reserved to Westminster." Supported by: Michael Matheson*, Mr Kenny MacAskill*, Bruce Crawford*, Ms Margo MacDonald*, Christine Grahame* Â  
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-334.2&exclude=&from=1999-12-02&to=1999-12-02">search for this motion (S1M-334.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The fourth question is, that amendment S1M-334.2, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, seeking to amend motion S1M-334, in the name of Jackie Baillie, on equalities, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>