division_name: [S1M-2619] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-2619</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-01-18f.htm">bulletin on 2002-01-18</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-2619 Alex Neil: Public Appointments (Parliamentary Approval) (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Public Appointments (Parliamentary Approval) (Scotland) Bill. 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-01-21f.htm">bulletin on 2002-01-21</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S1M-2619 Alex Neil: Public Appointments (Parliamentary Approval) (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Public Appointments (Parliamentary Approval) (Scotland) Bill. 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-01-22f.htm">bulletin on 2002-01-22</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S1M-2619 Public Appointments (Parliamentary Approval) (Scotland) Bill (lodged on 17 January 2002) Mr Gil Paterson*, Mr Adam Ingram*, Mr Lloyd Quinan* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-2619&exclude=&from=2002-02-07&to=2002-02-07">search for this motion (S1M-2619) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The next question is, that motion S1M-2619, in the name of Alex Neil, on the general principles of the Public Appointments (Parliamentary Approval) (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>