division_name: [S2M-2824.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-2824.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-05-19f.htm">bulletin on 2005-05-19</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   * S2M-2824.2 Miss Annabel Goldie: Tackling Serious and Organised Crime - Developing Strategic PartnershipsâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-2824) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from âthe Scottish Executiveâsâ to end and insert âactions which will create an efficient court process; backs the Scottish Executiveâs efforts to ensure greater co-operation with European and international criminal justice agencies; believes that the status of the Scottish Drug Enforcement Agency should be strengthened and therefore hopes that it will not be undermined by the creation of the Serious Organised Crime Agency; commends the success of the Crown Office in recovering Â£5.4 million since the introduction of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002; continues to support the sustained efforts of all those involved in disrupting and destroying the criminal networks which profit from inflicting violence and misery on communities in Scotland, but believes that crime will continue to blight too many Scottish communities until there is an increased police presence on our streets coupled with a zero-tolerant attitude to crime.â 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-2824.2&exclude=&from=2005-05-19&to=2005-05-19">search for this motion (S2M-2824.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that amendment S2M-2824.2, in the name of Annabel Goldie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2824, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on tackling serious organised crime and developing strategic partnerships, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>