division_name: [S2M-161.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-161.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-03/bb-06-19f.htm">bulletin on 2003-06-19</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-161.3 John Swinburne: Care Homes for the Elderly-As an amendment to motion (S2M-161) in the name of Mr David Davidson, leave out from "there is" to end and insert "means testing discriminates against residents who have made provision for their long-term care and calls on the Executive to provide long-term care for the elderly without such discrimination". 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-161.3&exclude=&from=2003-06-19&to=2003-06-19">search for this motion (S2M-161.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>In that case, amendment S2M-161.1, in the name of Stewart Stevenson, and amendment S2M-161.3, in the name of John Swinburne, are pre-empted. Therefore, the next question is, that motion S2M-161, in the name of David Davidson, on care homes for the elderly, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>