division_name: [S3M-5620] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-5620</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-10/bb-01-27f.htm">bulletin on 2010-01-27</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  * S3M-5620 Pauline McNeill: The Scottish Newspaper IndustryâThat the Parliament notes the important role played by local newspapers in Scotland; believes that, in the current economic climate, it is more important than ever to recognise the importance and value of community newspapers; notes that local newspapers provide a forum for expression that enables local people to deliberate on issues affecting their community; notes with concern the Scottish Government proposals to remove the legal requirement for local authorities to advertise public information notices in newspapers; believes that, if this proposal succeeds, it will deny the 38% of Scots who do not have internet access vital information currently available to them in newspapers, will create a democratic deficit and damage the local and national newspaper industry at a critical time; fears that a smaller newspaper industry will dilute quality journalism and training opportunities for young journalists, and calls on the Scottish Government to withdraw the draft Local Authority Public Information Notices (Electronic Publication) (Scotland) Order 2010. 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-5620&exclude=&from=2010-01-28&to=2010-01-28">search for this motion (S3M-5620) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that motion S3M-5620, in the name of Pauline McNeill, on the Scottish newspaper industry, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>