division_name: [S3M-3652] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-3652</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-03-10f.htm">bulletin on 2009-03-10</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S3M-3652 Kenny MacAskill: Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill - UK LegislationâThat the Parliament agrees that the relevant provisions of the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill, introduced in the House of Lords on 14 January 2009, relating to the power of detention for individuals subject to an outstanding arrest warrant and their enforcement, so far as these matters fall within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Fergus Ewing* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-03-16f.htm">bulletin on 2009-03-16</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S3M-3652 Kenny MacAskill: Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill - UK LegislationâThat the Parliament agrees that the relevant provisions of the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill, introduced in the House of Lords on 14 January 2009, relating to the power of detention for individuals subject to an outstanding arrest warrant and their enforcement, so far as these matters fall within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Fergus Ewing 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-3652&exclude=&from=2009-03-19&to=2009-03-19">search for this motion (S3M-3652) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The final question is, that legislative consent motion S3M-3652, in the name of Kenny MacAskill, on the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill, which is United Kingdom legislation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>