division_name: [S3M-3075.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-3075.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-08/bb-12-11f.htm">bulletin on 2008-12-11</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S3M-3075.1 Alex Johnstone: ScotRail FranchiseâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-3075) in the name of Des McNulty, leave out from "expresses" to end and insert "notes from the report that the original contract, negotiated by the previous Labour-led Scottish administration, "did not specify the conditions under which an extension should be considered or the criteria to be used to decide whether an extension might be appropriate"; believes that practice and procedures for future contract management can be improved and notes the reportâs recommendations for Transport Scotland; considers that, in light of the finding that "First ScotRail was performing above its punctuality and capacity improvements targets within its first year of operating" and "key aspects of the original franchise contract were no longer fit for purpose", the decision to extend the contract, inserted into the original contract under the previous Labour-led Scottish administration, was on balance justifiable." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-3075.1&exclude=&from=2008-12-11&to=2008-12-11">search for this motion (S3M-3075.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that amendment S3M-3075.1, in the name of Alex Johnstone, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3075, in the name of Des McNulty, on the ScotRail franchise, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>