division_name: [S2M-2388] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-2388</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/BB-02-09f.htm">bulletin on 2005-02-09</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   * S2M-2388 Ms Margaret Curran on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau:Approval of SSIâThat the Parliament agrees that the draft Remote Monitoring Requirements (Prescribed Courts) ( Scotland) Regulations 2005 be approved. Supported by: Tavish Scott* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/BB-02-14f.htm">bulletin on 2005-02-14</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S2M-2388 Ms Margaret Curran on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau:Approval of SSIâThat the Parliament agrees that the draft Remote Monitoring Requirements (Prescribed Courts) ( Scotland) Regulations 2005 be approved. Supported by: Tavish Scott 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-2388&exclude=&from=2005-02-23&to=2005-02-23">search for this motion (S2M-2388) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The fourth question is, that motion S2M-2388, in the name of Margaret Curran, on the approval of a Scottish statutory instrument, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>