division_name: [S1M-3602.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3602.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-11-21f.htm">bulletin on 2002-11-21</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-3602.1 Alex Fergusson: Scottish Executive Response to Foot-and-Mouth Disease InquiriesâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-3602) in the name of Ross Finnie, leave out from "and welcomes" to end and insert "; regrets the late publication of the Scottish Executiveâs response to the inquiries and the curtailment of the debate on the issue; considers the response to be vague and urges the Executive to clarify its position on key issues such as the future use of vaccinations; calls on the Executive to produce clear evidence that it is working urgently with Her Majestyâs Government to reduce the risk of importing infectious diseases, and seeks reassurance that the outcome of the inquiries will form the basis for continuing vigilance and regular updated contingency arrangements in the event of a future outbreak." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3602.1&exclude=&from=2002-11-21&to=2002-11-21">search for this motion (S1M-3602.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The sixth question is, that amendment S1M-3602.1, in the name of Alex Fergusson, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3602, in the name of Ross Finnie, on the Scottish Executive response to foot-and-mouth disease inquiries, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>