division_name: [S3M-788.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-788.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-11-08f.htm">bulletin on 2007-11-08</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S3M-788.1 Derek Brownlee: Holding the SNP Government to AccountâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-788) in the name of Jackie Baillie, leave out from "there should be" to end and insert "an effective budget scrutiny process is critical in ensuring that public services are delivered in a way which provides optimal value for money; believes that the process should be sufficiently robust to cope with majority and minority government; believes that there is scope to review the operation of the current procedures as laid down in the Standing Orders and the agreement between the Finance Committee and the Scottish Government; believes that the appropriate vehicle for such a review would be the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee, in consultation with the other committees of the Parliament, particularly the Finance Committee, and requests that the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee undertakes a review of the budget process for future years." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-788.1&exclude=&from=2007-11-08&to=2007-11-08">search for this motion (S3M-788.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are four questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S3M-788.1, in the name of Derek Brownlee, which seeks to amend motion S3M-788, in the name of Jackie Baillie, on holding the SNP Government to account, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>