division_name: Public Services
motion: <p class="" pid=".86.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move,</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid=".86.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">That this House notes that the Chancellor of the Exchequer's statement to the House of 27th November has been contradicted in whole or in part by the Secretary of State for Health, the Chairman of the Labour Party and Mr. Derek Wanless; further notes that the Chancellor of the Exchequer refused to endorse the statement made to the House by the Prime Minister on 28th November; and condemns the total confusion over funding the public services which these contradictions have caused among users and providers of these services.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid=".92.0/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, as a manuscript amendment, in line 1, leave out from "House" to end and add</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid=".92.0/2" pwmotiontext="yes">"welcomes the Pre-Budget Report with its emphasis on delivering high quality public services accessible to all in society as part of the Government's wider agenda to match resources with modernisation to progress reform; particularly welcomes Mr Derek Wanless's interim report "Securing our Future Health: Taking a Long-Term View", the first comprehensive look at the long term funding needs of the Health Service; notes Mr Wanless's conclusion that there is no evidence that any alternative financing method to the UK's would deliver a given quality of healthcare more equitably and at a lower cost to the economy; and reaffirms its support as stated by the Prime Minister and the Chancellor for future increases in public funding and NHS reform to ensure a comprehensive high quality service available on the basis of clinical need and not ability to pay."</p>
  
  <p pid=".127.4/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Question put,</i> That the original words stand part of the Question:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid=".127.4/2" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 169, Noes 297.</p>