division_name: [S2M-3922.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-3922.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-02-08f.htm">bulletin on 2006-02-08</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-3922.2 Mr John Swinney: Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2006âAs an amendment to motion (S2M-3922) in the name of Mr Tom McCabe, insert at end "but, in so doing, considers that, in order to protect council tax payers from above-inflation increases in council tax that will arise from the inadequate financial provision in this Order, local authorities should be permitted to retain Â£58.5 million in efficiency savings and obtain a Â£34.7m share of the public expenditure arising from the pre-Budget report to close the financial gap in support for local authority services that exists." Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-3922.2&exclude=&from=2006-02-08&to=2006-02-08">search for this motion (S2M-3922.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The first question is, that amendment S2M-3922.2, in the name of John Swinney, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3922, in the name of Tom McCabe, on the Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2006, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>