division_name: [S1M-3197.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3197.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-06-13f.htm">bulletin on 2002-06-13</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-3197.1 Richard Lochhead: Reform of the Common Fisheries PolicyâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-3197) in the name of Ross Finnie, leave out from "welcomes" to end and insert ", while welcoming many of the developments in the revised Common Fisheries Policy, calls for the Scottish Executive and European Union to guarantee that Scotlandâs historic fishing rights will be incorporated into the Common Fisheries Policy in perpetuity; believes that the proposed regional committees must have genuine decision-making powers to make a difference; notes that the EU continues to pursue damaging fisheries policies including the proposed inappropriate regulation of the deep-sea fishery, and calls on the Minister for Environment and Rural Development to demand that he leads the UKâs delegation during the forthcoming negotiations in order to secure Scotlandâs objectives." Supported by: Fergus Ewing* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3197.1&exclude=&from=2002-06-13&to=2002-06-13">search for this motion (S1M-3197.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S1M-3197.1, in the name of Richard Lochhead, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3197, in the name of Ross Finnie, on reform of the common fisheries policy, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>