division_name: [S3M-169.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-169.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-06-14f.htm">bulletin on 2007-06-14</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S3M-169.3 Michael McMahon: TridentâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-169) in the name of Patrick Harvie, leave out from "congratulates" to end and insert "affirms that defence policy is, and should remain, the responsibility of the UK Parliament". 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-169.3&exclude=&from=2007-06-14&to=2007-06-14">search for this motion (S3M-169.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The first question is, that amendment S3M-169.3, in the name of Michael McMahon, which seeks to amend motion S3M-169, in the name of Patrick Harvie, on Trident, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>