division_name: [S3M-945.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-945.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-11-29f.htm">bulletin on 2007-11-29</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-945.1 Liam McArthur: TourismâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-945) in the name of Jim Mather, leave out from second "recognises" to end and insert "believes that this objective is put at risk by the cuts to the budgets and business support activities of Highlands and Islands Enterprise and Scottish Enterprise which will reduce local decision-making and have a negative impact on the start-up and growth of tourism businesses across Scotland; notes with concern the lack of consultation over the restructuring of VisitScotland, and calls on the Scottish Government to commit to safeguarding the budgets and autonomy of the island offices under the control of VisitOrkney, VisitShetland and VisitHebrides." Supported by: Tavish Scott* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-945.1&exclude=&from=2007-11-29&to=2007-11-29">search for this motion (S3M-945.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The third question is, that amendment S3M-945.1, in the name of Liam McArthur, which seeks to amend motion S3M-945, in the name of Jim Mather, on tourism, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>