division_name: [S1M-3422.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3422.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-09-26f.htm">bulletin on 2002-09-26</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-3422.2 Lewis Macdonald: Impact on Transport of the Comprehensive Spending Review-As an amendment to motion (S1M-3422) in the name of David Mundell, leave out from "recognises" to end and insert "welcomes the increase in spending that the Scottish budget settlement for 2003-06 provides for transport as one of the Scottish Executive's five key priority areas and recognises that these resources lay the foundation for priority projects set out in the Transport Delivery Report that will transform Scotland's transport infrastructure over the next decade, delivering a sustainable transport system fit for the 21st century, which supports business and economic growth and meets the needs of all in society." Supported by: Iain Gray* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3422.2&exclude=&from=2002-09-26&to=2002-09-26">search for this motion (S1M-3422.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The next question is, that amendment S1M-3422.2, in the name of Lewis Macdonald, which seeks to amend motion <place-holder colnum="14245"/> S1M-3422, in the name of David Mundell, on the impact on transport of the comprehensive spending review, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>