division_name: [S2M-4095.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-4095.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-03-16f.htm">bulletin on 2006-03-16</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-4095.1 Tommy Sheridan: Appointment of the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner for a second periodâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-4095) in the name of John Scott, leave out from "agrees" to end and insert "does not, at this stage, agree with the recommendation of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body that Dr James Dyer should be appointed for a second period as Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner and agrees that an independent investigation should be instigated into the transparency and accountability of the actions of the Standards Commissioner and the standards process." Supported by: Colin Fox*, Campbell Martin*, Mr Bruce McFee* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-4095.1&exclude=&from=2006-03-16&to=2006-03-16">search for this motion (S2M-4095.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S2M-4095.1, in the name of Tommy Sheridan, which seeks to amend motion S2M-4095, in the name of John Scott, on appointment of the Scottish Parliamentary <place-holder colnum="24186"/> Standards Commissioner for a second period, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>