division_name: [S2M-5535.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-5535.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-02-08f.htm">bulletin on 2007-02-08</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-5535.2 Tavish Scott: Forth and Tay Road Bridges TollsâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-5535) in the name of Tricia Marwick, leave out from "believes" to end and insert "commits to a replacement crossing across the Forth and calls on the Cabinet to commit to preparatory work to start immediately; calls for the case for abolition of the tolls on the Fife Bridges to be considered in the light of the commitment to the new crossing; notes that the SNPâs sums do not add up and that under its current plans the SNP would not be able to afford to lift the tolls and pay for the construction of a new crossing; notes that its proposals do not address the impact of congestion or other environmental, social and economic impacts, and notes the importance of a sustainable transport policy, including smart tolling and investment in public transport to meet the long-term needs of Scotland." Supported by: Ms Margaret Curran* Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-5535.2&exclude=&from=2007-02-08&to=2007-02-08">search for this motion (S2M-5535.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The first question is, that amendment S2M-5535.2, in the name of Tavish Scott, which seeks to amend motion S2M-5535, in the name of Tricia Marwick, on tolls on the Forth and Tay road bridges, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>