division_name: [S2M-4039] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-4039</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-03-01f.htm">bulletin on 2006-03-01</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-4039 Nicola Sturgeon: Shirley McKieâThat the Parliament agrees with Lord McCluskey, retired High Court judge and former Solicitor General for Scotland, that one of the fundamental principles underlying the rule of law in a mature democracy is the principle that justice must be seen to be done; considers that in the case of Shirley McKie issues have arisen implying that justice has not been seen to be done, and, in further agreeing with Lord McCluskey that the issues involved are not party political but go to the heart of public trust in the criminal justice system, calls on the Scottish Executive to consider how the concerns expressed by Lord McCluskey should be addressed. Supported by: Miss Annabel Goldie*, Robin Harper* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-03-02f.htm">bulletin on 2006-03-02</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-4039 Shirley McKie (lodged on 28 February 2006) Alex Neil* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-03-08f.htm">bulletin on 2006-03-08</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S2M-4039 Nicola Sturgeon: Shirley McKieâThat the Parliament agrees with Lord McCluskey, retired High Court judge and former Solicitor General for Scotland, that one of the fundamental principles underlying the rule of law in a mature democracy is the principle that justice must be seen to be done; considers that in the case of Shirley McKie issues have arisen implying that justice has not been seen to be done, and, in further agreeing with Lord McCluskey that the issues involved are not party political but go to the heart of public trust in the criminal justice system, calls on the Scottish Executive to consider how the concerns expressed by Lord McCluskey should be addressed. 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-4039&exclude=&from=2006-03-08&to=2006-03-08">search for this motion (S2M-4039) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that motion S2M-4039, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, on Shirley McKie, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>