division_name: [S2M-4036.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-4036.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-03-08f.htm">bulletin on 2006-03-08</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-4036.2 Ross Finnie: Scottish WaterâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-4036) in the name of Rob Gibson, leave out from ",despite" to end and insert "Scottish Waterâs draft business plan of April 2005 stated that achieving Scottish Ministersâ objectives for 2006 to 2010 would require a capital investment programme of Â£3.7 billion and a doubling in customer charges; notes that the Water Industry Commissionâs determination of charges for 2006 to 2010 allowed Scottish Water a capital investment programme of Â£2.1 billion and charges rising by less than the rate of inflation to achieve the objectives; notes that Scottish Water accepted the determination but its plan demonstrating how it would deliver the objectives within the limits set by the determination was judged by the Executive, supported by the regulators, not to meet the requirements in a number of material aspects; notes that the Executive has required Scottish Water to produce a new plan which will command the confidence of Ministers and regulators, and considers these actions by the Executive to represent good stewardship of Scottish Water in the public and customer interest." Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-4036.2&exclude=&from=2006-03-08&to=2006-03-08">search for this motion (S2M-4036.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S2M-4036.2, in the name of Ross Finnie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-4036, in the name of Rob Gibson, on Scottish Water, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>