division_name: [S3M-1751.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-1751.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-08/bb-04-23f.htm">bulletin on 2008-04-23</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-1751.1 Ted Brocklebank: Historic Scotland and Local AuthoritiesâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-1751) in the name of Linda Fabiani, insert at end "and seeks a more compatible approach in relation to resolving disputes with stakeholders, particularly where Historic Scotland has no realistic means of funding its desired preservation or conservation outcomes". 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-1751.1&exclude=&from=2008-04-23&to=2008-04-23">search for this motion (S3M-1751.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that amendment S3M-1751.1, in the name of Ted Brocklebank, which seeks to amend motion S3M-1751, in the name of Linda Fabiani, on Historic Scotland and local authorities, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>