division_name: [S1M-1807.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-1807.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-03-29f.htm">bulletin on 2001-03-29</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-1807.1 Roseanna Cunningham: JusticeâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-1807) in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, leave out from "the record" to end and insert ", in considering the reduction in the overall numbers of police officers in Scotland since Labour came to power in the UK, (a) the overall increase in both the levels of crime and the fear of crime in that same period, (b) the serious public concerns about the levels of youth offending and (c) the low morale in both the Scottish Prison Service and in the Procurator Fiscalsâ Service; further notes that the commitment to be tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime has been a singular failure, and calls upon the Scottish Executive to bring forward a coherent programme which will both tackle the major problems currently being experienced across the Scottish criminal justice system and deliver a safer Scotland." Supported by: Michael Matheson*, Mr Kenneth Gibson*, Mr Andrew Welsh* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-03-30f.htm">bulletin on 2001-03-30</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S1M-1807.1 Justice (lodged on 28 March 2001) Dorothy-Grace Elder* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-1807.1&exclude=&from=2001-03-29&to=2001-03-29">search for this motion (S1M-1807.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that amendment S1M-1807.1, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1807, in the name of Jim Wallace, on justice, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>