division_name: [S1M-3944.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3944.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-03/bb-02-26f.htm">bulletin on 2003-02-26</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-3944.1 Malcolm Chisholm: HealthâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-3944) in the name of Mary Scanlon, leave out from "acknowledges" to end and insert "welcomes the further increases in the Scottish Executiveâs investment in health and health promotion announced earlier this month; notes that these extra resources must be balanced by reform in the NHS for full benefits to flow to service users; supports the on-going work to put patients at the centre of service planning and quality improvement in the NHS; supports the strengthening of the primary healthcare sector and decentralisation of decision-making; is concerned about waiting times for some out-patients; agrees with the priority given to tackling unacceptably long waits; commends the new maximum hospital waiting times guarantees for NHS patients given by the Executive; looks forward to further reductions in the number of patients waiting longest for treatment; welcomes the recent reduction in the number of delayed discharges from Scottish hospitals and the active collaboration between health and community care services in achieving this, and congratulates staff across the NHS in Scotland on their hard work and dedication to a highly regarded public service." Supported by: Mr Frank McAveety*, Mrs Mary Mulligan*
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3944.1&exclude=&from=2003-02-26&to=2003-02-26">search for this motion (S1M-3944.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The first question is, that amendment S1M-3944.1, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, which seeks to amend Mary Scanlon's motion on health, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>