division_name: [S2M-3323] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-3323</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-09-21f.htm">bulletin on 2005-09-21</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-3323 Patrick Harvie: Children of Asylum SeekersâThat the Parliament acknowledges the trauma experienced by the children of asylum seekers when families are removed for deportation and the impact this has on school communities; believes that practices such as those reportedly used against the Vucaj family in Glasgow, including dawn raids, handcuffing of children and the removal of children by large groups of officers in uniform and body armour, are unnecessary and cause fear and distress to the children concerned; affirms its support for the principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) which states that governments should protect children from all forms of physical or mental violence; recognises that, while the Scottish Executive has no direct responsibility for the operation of the asylum and immigration system, it is responsible for the welfare of children, for schools and for working with the UK Government to report on compliance with the UNCRC; commends the First Minister for his aspiration "to ensure that no child is left behind or held back", and calls on him to give the greatest possible urgency to realising that aspiration for the most vulnerable children in Scotland who include those facing detention and removal. Supported by: Robin Harper* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-3323&exclude=&from=2005-09-22&to=2005-09-22">search for this motion (S2M-3323) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that motion S2M-3323, in the name of Patrick Harvie, on children of asylum seekers, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>