division_name: [S1M-3867.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3867.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-03/bb-03-12f.htm">bulletin on 2003-03-12</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-3867.1 Alex Fergusson: Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Bill-As an amendment to motion (S1M-3867) in the name of Ross Finnie, insert at end "but, in doing so, regrets that, despite the worthwhile provisions in the Bill, the pre-emptive right to buy has undermined them; notes that there are indications that land to let is already becoming unavailable; believes that the present arrangement of allowing greater flexibility in the detail of leases between landlord and tenant is imperative for the tenanted sector, and considers certain provisions within the Bill are contrary to the interests of that sector and fail to provide opportunities for the next generation of farming tenants, thus failing to reinvigorate the tenanted sector of agriculture in accordance with the Bill's stated intention." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3867.1&exclude=&from=2003-03-12&to=2003-03-12">search for this motion (S1M-3867.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are two questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S1M-3867.1, in the name of Alex Fergusson, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3867, in the name of Ross Finnie, that the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>