division_name: [S1M-3149.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3149.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-05-28f.htm">bulletin on 2002-05-28</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-3149.1 Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Alternatives to Custody-As an amendment to motion (S1M-3149) in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, leave out from "commends" to end and insert "warns against the widespread extension of soft non-custodial sentences simply to empty Scotland's overcrowded prisons without sufficient regard to the protection of the public; notes with concern the plans paraded by the Scottish Executive to send the parents of young offenders to jail, and calls upon the Executive to put in place sufficient resources to make Scotland a safer place in which to live and work." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3149.1&exclude=&from=2002-05-28&to=2002-05-28">search for this motion (S1M-3149.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S1M-3149.1, in the name of Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3149, in the name of Jim Wallace, on <br/> <br/><place-holder colnum="12193"/> alternatives to custody, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>