division_name: [S2M-2119] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-2119</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-12-07f.htm">bulletin on 2004-12-07</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-2119 Cathy Jamieson: Constitutional Reform Bill - UK LegislationâThat the Parliament agrees the principle of having a clear and transparent separation between the judiciary and the legislature and agrees that provisions in the Constitutional Reform Bill establishing a Supreme Court, and provisions consequential thereto, so far as they relate to matters within the legislative competence of the Parliament, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-12-13f.htm">bulletin on 2004-12-13</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-2119 Cathy Jamieson: Constitutional Reform Bill - UK LegislationâThat the Parliament agrees the principle of having a clear and transparent separation between the judiciary and the legislature and agrees that provisions in the Constitutional Reform Bill establishing a Supreme Court, and provisions consequential thereto, so far as they relate to matters within the legislative competence of the Parliament, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-01-17f.htm">bulletin on 2005-01-17</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-2119 Cathy Jamieson: Constitutional Reform Bill - UK LegislationâThat the Parliament agrees the principle of having a clear and transparent separation between the judiciary and the legislature and agrees that provisions in the Constitutional Reform Bill establishing a Supreme Court, and provisions consequential thereto, so far as they relate to matters within the legislative competence of the Parliament, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-2119&exclude=&from=2005-01-19&to=2005-01-19">search for this motion (S2M-2119) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The fourth question is, that motion S2M-2119, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the Constitutional Reform Bill, under United Kingdom legislation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>