division_name: [S2M-718.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-718.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-03/bb-12-11f.htm">bulletin on 2003-12-11</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-718.3 Peter Peacock: Reform of Public Services-As an amendment to motion (S2M-718) in the name of David McLetchie, leave out from "acknowledges" to end and insert "supports the radical, demanding and relevant agenda set out in A Partnership for a Better Scotland including the delivery of excellent public services that put patients, pupils and victims first, ensure equality of access across urban and rural Scotland, devolve decision-making to front-line staff, establish national standards on which local excellence can be built, backed by inspection, and share best practice and action to tackle and turn around poor performance." Supported by: Malcolm Chisholm* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-718.3&exclude=&from=2003-12-11&to=2003-12-11">search for this motion (S2M-718.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The first question is, that amendment S2M-718.3, in the name of Peter Peacock, which seeks to amend motion S2M-718, in the name of David McLetchie, on reform of public services, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>