division_name: [S2M-4921] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-4921</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-10-05f.htm">bulletin on 2006-10-05</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-4921 Malcolm Chisholm: Planning etc. (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Johann Lamont* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-10-09f.htm">bulletin on 2006-10-09</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-4921 Malcolm Chisholm: Planning etc. (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Johann Lamont 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-11-13f.htm">bulletin on 2006-11-13</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-4921 Malcolm Chisholm: Planning etc. (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Johann Lamont 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-4921&exclude=&from=2006-11-16&to=2006-11-16">search for this motion (S2M-4921) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that motion S2M-4921, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, that the Parliament agrees that the Planning etc (Scotland) Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>