division_name: [S3M-5267.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-5267.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-11-25f.htm">bulletin on 2009-11-25</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-5267.1 Mary Mulligan: Child Poverty Bill - UK LegislationâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-5267) in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, insert at end "and, in so doing, regrets that the Scottish Government will not be placing a duty on local authorities to meet the agreed targets for reducing child poverty, given their partnership role in tackling child poverty, and therefore calls on the Scottish Government to review the single outcome agreements currently available to ascertain whether local authorities have developed a child poverty strategy that will contribute to Scottish and UK targets aimed at abolishing child poverty and, if not, to return to the Scottish Parliament with a proposal to place a duty on local authorities to do so." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-5267.1&exclude=&from=2009-11-25&to=2009-11-25">search for this motion (S3M-5267.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-5267.1, in the name of Mary Mulligan, which seeks to amend motion S3M-5267, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, on the Child Poverty Bill, which is United Kingdom legislation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>