division_name: [S1M-2344] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-2344</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-10-24f.htm">bulletin on 2001-10-24</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-2344 Andrew Wilson: Railway InvestmentâThat the Parliament welcomes the desire of the Minister for Transport and Planning to increase investment in Scottish railways; notes that with the collapse of Railtrack plc there is an opportunity to introduce an innovative system of ownership and management for Scotlandâs railway network that takes advantage of the good partnership that exists across the railway sector in Scotland, and calls upon the Scottish Executive and all interested parties in Scotland to work together in the Scottish national interest to (a) re-examine the financial and policy powers at the disposal of the Scottish Ministers with respect to railways investment and (b) develop an ownership and investment vehicle for Railtrack assets in Scotland that maximises both public accountability and investment in Scotlandâs railways in the public interest and on a not for profit basis. 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-10-25f.htm">bulletin on 2001-10-25</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S1M-2344 Railway Investment (lodged on 23 October 2001) Michael Russell* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-10-26f.htm">bulletin on 2001-10-26</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S1M-2344 Railway Investment (lodged on 23 October 2001) Mr Adam Ingram*, Mr Lloyd Quinan*, Mr Gil Paterson* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-2344&exclude=&from=2001-10-25&to=2001-10-25">search for this motion (S1M-2344) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that motion S1M-2344, in the name of Andrew Wilson, on railway investment, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>