division_name: [S2M-685.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-685.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-03/bb-12-03f.htm">bulletin on 2003-12-03</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-685.2 Nicola Sturgeon: Modernising Access to Legal Advice, Information and Representation-As an amendment to motion (S2M-685) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, insert at end ", but expresses concern that the reality for far too many people in need of legal advice, information and representation still falls far short of this standard, that availability of high quality legal advice and representation for people who cannot afford to pay for it is less accessible now than previously, and that access to advice and assistance from non-legally qualified providers, which in many circumstances is more appropriate than access to a solicitor, remains needlessly fragmented and geographically inconsistent due to a failure to build on best practice where it exists." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-685.2&exclude=&from=2003-12-03&to=2003-12-03">search for this motion (S2M-685.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are five questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-685.2, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, which seeks to amend motion S2M-685, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on modernising access to legal advice, information and representation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>