division_name: [S1M-68.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-68.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-99/bb-24-06f.htm">bulletin on 1999-06-24</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-68.1 Mr John Swinney: As an amendment to the motion (S1M-68) in the name of Henry McLeish leave out from "is falling" to end and insert:-- "remains a grave and ongoing economic and social problem which is not addressed by a partial representation of statistics; and calls on the Executive to develop an economic strategy that has long term sustainable growth in the economy and jobs as its focus and addresses the need to: recognise small businesses as the engine of growth in the economy and the labour market and tackles the need to improve entrepreneurship and business start-up, survival and expansion with particular emphasis on reducing business rates; develop cohesive economic development structures through greater synergy between agencies involved in economic development, inward investment, exporting and tourism and to gain maximum benefit from Scotlandâs external representation; produce compelling evidence that the New Deal is delivering long-term structural change in the labour market that will be sustained when the New Deal programme has concluded, and generate competitive advantage for companies in Scotland." Supported by : Fergus Ewing, Mr Duncan Hamilton, Alex Neil, Ms Sandra White. Â  
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-68.1&exclude=&from=1999-06-24&to=1999-06-24">search for this motion (S1M-68.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The third question is, that amendment S1M-68.1, in the name of Mr John Swinney, which proposes an amendment to motion S1M-68, in the name of Henry McLeish, on the economy of Scotland, be agreed to. Are we all agreed? </p>
  
  <p> No. </p>
  
  <p>There will be a division. Those who want to vote in support of Mr Swinney's amendment should vote yes. </p></p>