division_name: [S1M-4012.5 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-4012.5</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-03/bb-03-13f.htm">bulletin on 2003-03-13</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-4012.5 Nora Radcliffe: The Current International SituationâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-4012) in the name of Mr John Swinney, leave out from first "believes" to end and insert "condemns the failure of the Iraqi regime to respect international law and human rights; supports the United Nationsâ (UN) efforts to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction under UN Security Council Resolution 1441; calls for the inspectors to be given sufficient time and resources to continue their work as long as the Security Council assesses that progress can be made; believes that only as a last resort, once all other options have been exhausted, should military action in Iraq be undertaken, and opposes any military action not sanctioned by a further resolution from the Security Council and an affirmative vote on a substantive motion in the House of Commons." Supported by: Tavish Scott*, John Farquhar Munro*, Iain Smith*, Ian Jenkins*, Mr Mike Rumbles*, George Lyon*, Robert Brown*, Mr Keith Raffan*, Mr Jamie Stone*, Donald Gorrie* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-4012.5&exclude=&from=2003-03-13&to=2003-03-13">search for this motion (S1M-4012.5) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The next question is, that amendment S1M-4012.5, in the name of Nora Radcliffe, which seeks to amend the amended motion, in the name of John Swinney, on the current international situation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>