division_name: Criminal Justice and Court Services Bill - Approved bail hostels, etc.
motion: <p>
   I beg to move amendment No. 122, in page 2, line 10, at end insert--
   
  
  <p> 
    
  '(d) the education of offenders, in particular about the impact of crime on the victims of crime and the public.'.<p>We welcome the Minister's decision not to change the Service's name, but Part III of the Bill introduces a completely new nomenclature for community sentences . . . which the Committee--
  <p>considers both unnecessary and unhelpful. The new names (in particular community punishment order for community service order, and community rehabilitation order for probation order) offer an over-simplified account of their functions, and are likely to increase confusion about community sentences, and undermine rather than enhance public understanding of the work of the service.
  <p>the education of offenders, in particular about the impact of crime on the victims of crime and the public.
  <p>NAPO is opposed to the renaming of existing community orders. The phrase "probation order" has international resonance and recognition. Community service has a higher profile than the Home Office appears to believe.
  <p>When it is not necessary to change, it is necessary not to change.  <p>Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. 
  
   <p> 
   Amendment proposed:  No. 123, in page 5, line 3, leave out "community rehabilitation" and insert "probation".-- [Mr.  Hawkins.] 
  <p>Question put,  That the amendment be made:--
  <p>The House divided:  Ayes 122, Noes 289.
   