division_name: [S3M-1489.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-1489.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-08/bb-03-06f.htm">bulletin on 2008-03-06</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-1489.2 Sarah Boyack: OECD Review of Scotlandâs Rural PolicyâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-1489) in the name of Richard Lochhead, insert at end "however is concerned that recent Scottish Government budget decisions have the capacity to set back progress made." Supported by: Karen Gillon* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-1489.2&exclude=&from=2008-03-06&to=2008-03-06">search for this motion (S3M-1489.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-1489.2, in the name of Sarah Boyack, which seeks to amend motion S3M-1489, in the name of Richard Lochhead, on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development review of Scotland's rural policy, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>