division_name: [S3M-173.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-173.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-06-14f.htm">bulletin on 2007-06-14</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-173.3 Alison McInnes: Carbon OffsettingâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-173) in the name of Robin Harper, leave out from first "notes" to end and insert "applauds the introduction by the previous Scottish Government of the first-ever Scottish climate change target to exceed the Scottish share of the UK target by an additional one million tonnes by 2010; notes the intention of the current Scottish Government to introduce a climate change Bill; believes that this Bill and other government action should set challenging and achievable targets for reducing carbon emissions of at least 12.5% by 2010 and 60% by 2050; further notes the SNP manifesto commitment to annual targets to reduce carbon emissions; welcomes the commitment to a climate change Bill but believes that early action should be taken in advance of the Bill to improve energy eficiency, reduce energy use and support microgeneration; further believes that the public sector should take the lead by ensuring that all Scottish Government buildings and transport become carbon neutral by 2012; considers that carbon offsetting should normally be viewed as a last resort as a carbon reduction measure, and is concerned that the SNP Governmentâs transport plans and opposition to public transport plans will render existing and future plans to reduce carbon emissions unattainable." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-173.3&exclude=&from=2007-06-14&to=2007-06-14">search for this motion (S3M-173.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The next question is, that amendment S3M-173.3, in the name of Alison McInnes, which seeks to amend motion S3M-173, in the name of Robin Harper, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>