division_name: [S2M-5535.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-5535.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-02-08f.htm">bulletin on 2007-02-08</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-5535.1 Mark Ballard: Forth and Tay Road Bridges TollsâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-5535) in the name of Tricia Marwick, leave out from "the tolls" to end and insert "existing tolls on the Forth Road Bridge and the Tay Road Bridge should be replaced with a scheme of variable charging which takes into account factors such as occupancy levels, peak hour traffic flows and specific exemptions, including for public transport, and that the Tay Road Bridge Joint Board and the Forth Transport Estuary Forum should be given more flexibility to use toll revenues to deal with transport issues in the vicinity." Supported by: Mr Mark Ruskell* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-5535.1&exclude=&from=2007-02-08&to=2007-02-08">search for this motion (S2M-5535.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that amendment S2M-5535.1, in the name of Mark Ballard, which seeks to amend motion S2M-5535, in the name of Tricia Marwick, on tolls on the Forth and Tay road bridges, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>