division_name: [S1M-1147.2 (Amendment)] Business Motion
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-1147.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-00/bb-09-06f.htm">bulletin on 2000-09-06</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-1147.2 Mr Alex Salmond: Business MotionâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-1147) in the name of Mr Tom McCabe, under Thursday 7 September 2000, delete "Stage 3 Debate on the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Scotland) Bill" and insert "Debate on the Scottish Qualifications Authority and the crisis of year 2000 Higher and Standard Grade results", and delete "Continuation of Stage 3 Debate on the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Scotland) Bill" and insert "Continuation of Debate on the Scottish Qualifications Authority and the crisis of year 2000 Higher and Standard Grade results". Supported by: Mr John Swinney*, Michael Russell*, Nicola Sturgeon*, Michael Matheson*, Mrs Margaret Ewing*, Linda Fabiani*, Shona Robison*, Bruce Crawford*, Ms Sandra White*, Mr Duncan Hamilton* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-1147.2&exclude=&from=2000-09-06&to=2000-09-06">search for this motion (S1M-1147.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>On a point of order. If there is some doubt about the Liberal consoles, and given the relative closeness of the vote, should we not take the vote again?</p>
  
  <p> Does any other member have doubt about whether their vote was recorded? <i>[Interruption.]</i> Due to the fact that there was a majority of only six in that vote, we will take it again. I ask all members to check their consoles.</p>
  
  <p>The question is, that amendment S1M-1147.2, in the name of Alex Salmond, be agreed to.</p></p>