division_name: [S1M-2012.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-2012.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-06-21f.htm">bulletin on 2001-06-21</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-2012.3 Michael Russell: Holyrood ProjectâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-2012) in the name of Des McNulty, after "rigorously" insert "; calls on the Scottish Executive to work with the SPCB to agree a financial plan for the completion of the project which has no adverse implications for revenue expenditure on public services in Scotland and which recognises that the project must be funded through normal procedures for major capital works, for example through borrowing at government rates; further demands that the Scottish Executive appoint a minister to attend the progress group in order to engage the Executive fully in the project and its financing; notes that the financial and other problems of the project now being tackled by the progress group are a result of deeply flawed decisions made by Westminster politicians prior to the establishment of the Parliament and by repeated misinformation thereafter from New Labour and the Scottish Executive on the likely costs of the project." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-2012.3&exclude=&from=2001-06-21&to=2001-06-21">search for this motion (S1M-2012.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S1M-2012.3, in the name of Michael Russell, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2012, in the name of Des McNulty, on the Holyrood project, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>