division_name: Judicial Review and Courts Bill &#8212; Clause 1 - Quashing orders
motion: <p class="indent" pid="c603.1/14" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;Without our barrister offering to act pro bono at the inquest hearing we&#8217;re not sure what would have happened. It seems desperately unfair that we have had to crowdfund to cover our legal fees, and rely on our barrister waiving her charges, when the hospital&#8217;s legal team are paid for by our taxes.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="c606.0/4" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;came to the firm conclusion that Cart ought to go. It did so carefully considering the fact that Parliament should be slow before reversing decisions of the Supreme Court.&#8221;&#8212;[Official Report, House of Lords, <phrase class="date" code="2022-03-31">31 March</phrase> 2022; Vol. 820, c. 1736.]</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="c610.0/7" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;allow the Government to keep up their pretence about respect for Scotland&#8221;.&#8212;[Official Report, <phrase class="date" code="2022-01-25">25 January</phrase> 2022; Vol. 707, c. 939.]</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="c610.0/11" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;a concerted attempt to shut down potential routes of accountability and exert the power of the executive over Parliament, the courts and the public&#8221;</p>