division_name: Private Security Industry Bill [Lords] - Conduct prohibited without a licence
motion: <p>As amended in the Standing Committee, considered. 
   <p>Brought up, and read the First time. 
  
  <p>
   I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
  <p> 
  
    Based on my reading of the debate in another place and on having served on the Standing Committee that considered the Bill, I am supremely confident that the Minister will not accept my new clause. I certainly understand the reasons for his reticence, which is due mainly to the fact that time is running out. Some weeks ago, I had to decide whether half a loaf was better than none; after some agonising, I decided on half a loaf--with the possibility of its dramatic expansion. I am not a cook, but there is always the possibility that, with careful nurturing and cooking, bread will expand. I hope that in time there will be more legislation.
  <p>Motion and clause, by leave, withdrawn .
  <p>Brought up, and read the First time. 
  <p>
   I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
  <p> 
  
    This is my second and final proposed change to the Bill. Under the new clause:
  <p>Motion and clause, by leave, withdrawn. 
  
   <p>
   I beg to move amendment No. 3, in page 3, line 51, at end insert--
   
  
  <p> 
    
  '(3A) Before making an order under subsection (3) which designates any of the activities specified in paragraph 5 of Schedule 2, which relate to the security of information which is held in electronic form, the Secretary of State shall lay a certificate before each House of Parliament stating that in his opinion the order complies with the provisions of European Directive 2000/31/EC (on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the internal market).'.<p>Question put,  That the amendment be made:--
  <p>The House divided:  Ayes 111, Noes 315.
   