division_name: [S1M-61] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-61</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-99/bb-22-06f.htm">bulletin on 1999-06-22</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-61 Angus Mackay: That the Parliament agrees that the Financial Services and Markets Bill, the Electronic Communications Bill and the Limited Liability Partnerships Bill should be considered by the UK Parliament. Â  
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-61&exclude=&from=1999-06-23&to=1999-06-23">search for this motion (S1M-61) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>On a point of order. I am not clear about what is happening. We cannot hear from here. </p>
  
  <p>I am sorry. There was a little exchange on this side of the chamber. There is some doubt about the result of the vote on motion S1M-61 in the name of Angus Mackay, although I now understand that it was the correct result. However, the result has been challenged and there is some doubt. We will take the vote again. </p>
  
  <p>The question is, that motion S1M-61, in the name of Angus Mackay, be agreed to. Members should vote yes to agree to the motion, no to disagree with the motion or abstain to record an abstention. </p></p>