division_name: [S3M-4004] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-4004</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-04-29f.htm">bulletin on 2009-04-29</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-4004 John Swinney: Budget Implications for ScotlandâThat the Parliament expresses its deep concern at the contents of the Chancellor of the Exchequerâs Budget last week; recognises that this is a product of poor financial management of the UK economy in recent years that will leave unprecedented burdens of debt for many years to come; acknowledges the significant pressure that the reduction of planned budgets of Â£500 million will have on public services, and calls on the Scottish Government to bring forward budget proposals for 2010-11 that will support a sustainable economy and effective public services and include an assessment of the carbon impact of its budget. Supported by: Jim Mather* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-4004&exclude=&from=2009-04-30&to=2009-04-30">search for this motion (S3M-4004) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that motion S3M-4004, in the name of John Swinney, on budget implications for Scotland, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>