division_name: [S2M-618.3.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-618.3.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-03/bb-11-20f.htm">bulletin on 2003-11-20</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-618.3.1 Mike Rumbles: World Peace-As an amendment to amendment (S2M-618.3) in the name of Mr John Home Robertson, leave out from "reasserts" to end and insert "acknowledges the deep feeling aroused by the State visit of the US President George W Bush; believes that initiating military action in Iraq without a clear UN mandate was wrong, and recognises the opportunity presented by the visit to make clear the public's wish that those who initiated the war have a duty, under the supervision of the UN, to make Iraq safe and give its people the opportunity of a democratic future, that the British citizens in Guantanamo Bay are either charged and receive a fair trial or are sent home to face justice within the UK, and that the promise to continue the unremitting search for peace in the Middle East with security for Israel and justice for the Palestinians must be honoured." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-618.3.1&exclude=&from=2003-11-20&to=2003-11-20">search for this motion (S2M-618.3.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S2M-618.3.1, in the name of Mike Rumbles, which seeks to amend amendment S2M-618.3, in the name of John Home Robertson, on world peace, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>