division_name: [S3M-3078.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-3078.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-08/bb-12-11f.htm">bulletin on 2008-12-11</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S3M-3078.1 Adam Ingram: Kinship CareâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-3078) in the name of Rhona Brankin, leave out from "to provide" to end and insert "to kinship carers; notes the increase of over 100% of looked-after children since 2000 who live with a kinship carer; recognises the crucial role that these carers play in supporting our most vulnerable children and that they should be supported financially at an equivalent level to foster carers; welcomes work by local authorities towards providing financial support to approved kinship carers of looked-after children using resources provided by central government and further welcomes the work of COSLA and the Association of Directors of Social Work to support the efforts of all local authorities to achieve this; calls on the Scottish Government to work constructively with the UK Government to resolve issues arising out of the interface with United Kingdom benefits legislation, and in this context notes the willingness of United Kingdom ministers to address anomalies in benefits entitlement for kinship carers." Supported by: Fiona Hyslop* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-3078.1&exclude=&from=2008-12-11&to=2008-12-11">search for this motion (S3M-3078.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The fifth question is, that amendment S3M-3078.1, in the name of Adam Ingram, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3078, in the name of Rhona Brankin, on kinship care, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>