division_name: Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Bill
motion: <p class="" pid=".188.3/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid=".188.3/2" pwmotiontext="yes">When the Government came to power in 1997, we had one of the most centralised systems of government in the western world. It had no regional democratic accountability and ignored the needs and aspirations of the regions, where XWhitehall knew best." The system was unsuited to a diverse and changing society, and ill equipped for our modern economy. It allowed divisions between and in the regions to widen.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid=".197.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, To leave out from XThat" to the end of the Question, and to add instead thereof:</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid=".197.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">That this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Bill because it is a centralising measure that will have the effect of undermining local democracy; it places too much power in the hands of the Secretary of State to determine the timing of each referendum in each region; it fails to protect the right of individual communities to determine the local government structure that suits them best; the arrangements for referenda are inadequate and insufficiently defined; it fails to recognise that unitary authorities are not an appropriate solution in all parts of the country; it fails to recognise the needs of rural areas; and it is incapable of protecting long-established county councils.</p>
  
  <p pid=".272.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Question put,</i> That the amendment be made:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid=".272.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 141, Noes 389.</p>