division_name: [S3M-4065.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-4065.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-05-07f.htm">bulletin on 2009-05-07</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-4065.3 Fergus Ewing: Community CourtsâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-4065) in the name of Bill Aitken, leave out from "notes" to end and insert "recognises that community courts based on the New York City model in Midtown can help to address patterns of offending behaviour by providing for swift and effective summary justice coupled with a range of rehabilitation services to break the cycle of reoffending; notes the decision by the project board for the Glasgow Community Justice Centre that in the current economic circumstances they should not proceed with the development of a new court building, and supports the joint work underway between Glasgow City Council and the Scottish Government to identify how best offenders can pay back for their crimes to the communities most in need of reinvestment and local services can be directed to support offenders out of a life of crime." Supported by: Kenny MacAskill* Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-4065.3&exclude=&from=2009-05-07&to=2009-05-07">search for this motion (S3M-4065.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-4065.3, in the name of Fergus Ewing, which seeks to amend motion S3M-4065, in the name of Bill Aitken, on community courts, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>