division_name: Orders of the Day &#8212; Clause 1 &#8212; Aerodrome charges: noise and emissions
motion: <p class="" pid="d.466.5/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their amendments and proposes Government amendments (a) and (b) in lieu thereof.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="d.466.5/2" pwmotiontext="yes">Commencing with amendment No. 1, we simply do not believe that it would be appropriate to impose a legal duty on all 140-odd licensed aerodromes to impose noise-related and emissions charges. Such a move would be disproportionate and would represent gross over-regulation. Many of the aerodromes are relatively small in size and will cause little or no significant disturbance or local air quality problems. Such a move would be at odds with the Government's policy of not imposing unnecessary regulation on business. On that we have been, and continue to be, steadfastly clear.</p>
  
  <p pid="d.478.4/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i> Question put, </i>That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their amendments and proposes Government amendments (a) and (b) in lieu thereof.</p>
  
  <p pid="d.478.4/2" pwmotiontext="yes"><i> The House divided:</i> Ayes 242, Noes 131.</p>