division_name: Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill
motion: <p pid="a.1516.5/1" pwmotiontext="moved">moved Amendments Nos. 88A to 88D:</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1516.5/2" pwmotiontext="moved">Clause 75, page 54, line 1, leave out "(4) and (5)" insert "(3A) to (6)"</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1516.5/3" pwmotiontext="moved">Clause 75, page 54, line 2, at end insert&#8212;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1516.5/4" pwmotiontext="moved">"(3A) If D claims to have held a particular belief as regards the existence of any circumstances&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1516.5/5" pwmotiontext="moved">(a) the reasonableness or otherwise of that belief is relevant to the question whether D genuinely held it; but(b) if it is determined that D did genuinely hold it, D is entitled to rely on it for the purposes of subsection (3), whether or not&#8212;(i) it was mistaken, or(ii) (if it was mistaken) the mistake was a reasonable one to have made.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1516.5/6" pwmotiontext="moved">(3B) But subsection (3A)(b) does not enable D to rely on any mistaken belief attributable to intoxication that was voluntarily induced."</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1516.5/7" pwmotiontext="moved">Clause 75, page 54, line 4, leave out first "those circumstances" and insert "the circumstances as D believed them to be"</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1516.5/8" pwmotiontext="moved">Clause 75, page 54, line 5, after "question" insert "mentioned in subsection (3)"</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1516.5/9" pwmotiontext="moved">On Question, amendments agreed to.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1517.1/1" pwmotiontext="moved">moved Amendment No. 88E:</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1517.1/2" pwmotiontext="moved">Clause 75, page 54, line 18, leave out subsections (8) and (9)</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1517.1/3" pwmotiontext="moved">On Question, amendment agreed to.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1517.1/4" pwmotiontext="moved">[<I>Amendments Nos. 89 to 91 not moved.</I>]</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1517.2/1" pwmotiontext="moved">moved Amendment No. 91A:</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1517.2/2" pwmotiontext="moved">Clause 75, leave out Clause 75 and insert the following new Clause&#8212;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1517.2/3" pwmotiontext="moved">"Self-defence etc.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1517.2/4" pwmotiontext="moved">(1) The Criminal Law Act 1967 (c. 58) is amended as follows.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1517.2/5" pwmotiontext="moved">(2) In section 3 (use of force in making arrest, etc.) after subsection (1), insert&#8212;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1517.2/6" pwmotiontext="moved">"(1A) Where a person uses force in the prevention of crime, or in the defence of persons or property, on another who is in any building or part of a building having entered as a trespasser or is attemping so to enter, that person shall not be guilty of any offence in respect of the use of that force unless&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1517.2/7" pwmotiontext="moved">(a) the degree of force used was grossly disportionate, and(b) this was, or ought to have been, apparent to the person using such force.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1517.2/8" pwmotiontext="moved">(1B) No prosecution shall be brought against a person subject to subsection (1A) without the leave of the Attorney General.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a.1517.2/9" pwmotiontext="moved">(1C) In this section "building or part of a building" shall have the same meaning as in section 9 of the Theft Act 1968 (c. 60) (burglary).""</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1522.3/1" pwmotiontext="considered">On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 91A) shall be agreed to?</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1522.3/2" pwmotiontext="divided">Their Lordships divided: Contents, 87; Not-Contents, 217.</p>