division_name: [S2M-3628] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-3628</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-11-25f.htm">bulletin on 2005-11-25</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-3628 Cathy Jamieson: Family Law (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Family Law (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-11-28f.htm">bulletin on 2005-11-28</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-3628 Cathy Jamieson: Family Law (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Family Law (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-12-12f.htm">bulletin on 2005-12-12</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S2M-3628 Cathy Jamieson: Family Law (Scotland) BillâThat the Parliament agrees that the Family Law (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-3628&exclude=&from=2005-12-15&to=2005-12-15">search for this motion (S2M-3628) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are three questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that motion S2M-3628, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, that the Family Law (Scotland) Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>