division_name: [S3M-4004.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-4004.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-04-30f.htm">bulletin on 2009-04-30</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-4004.2 Jeremy Purvis: Budget Implications for ScotlandâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-4004) in the name of John Swinney, insert at end "; agrees that the temporary cut in VAT has proved costly and ineffective, and regrets the decision of the Scottish MPs who voted to support the cut when the money could have been used to create thousands of jobs in green energy and public transport." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-4004.2&exclude=&from=2009-04-30&to=2009-04-30">search for this motion (S3M-4004.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-4004.2, in the name of Jeremy Purvis, which seeks to amend motion S3M-4004, in the name of John Swinney, on budget implications for Scotland, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>