division_name: [S2M-985.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-985.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-03-11f.htm">bulletin on 2004-03-11</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-985.1 Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Nursery Nurses, A Just ClaimâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-985) in the name of Carolyn Leckie, leave out from "agrees" to end and insert "supports local pay bargaining; welcomes the settlement by nine local authorities, but calls on UNISON to make a special dispensation for children who have special educational needs due to the severe impact that the strike has on them and their families." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-985.1&exclude=&from=2004-03-11&to=2004-03-11">search for this motion (S2M-985.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The question is, that amendment S2M-985.1, in <place-holder colnum="6656"/> the name of Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, which seeks to amend motion S2M-985, in the name of Carolyn Leckie, on nursery nurses, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>