division_name: [S2M-828.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-828.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-01-29f.htm">bulletin on 2004-01-29</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-828.1 Nicola Sturgeon: Modernising the Court System - A New Supreme Court-As an amendment to motion (S2M-828) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from "believing" to end and insert "for England and Wales; considers, however, that its creation affords an opportunity for the modernisation and repatriation of Scotland's justice system, including an end to the historic anomaly that allows civil, but not criminal, cases to be appealed to a UK court and, having established that principle, calls on the Scottish Executive to consult on whether the Inner House of the Court of Session or a higher appellate authority within Scotland should be the final court of appeal in Scottish civil cases." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-828.1&exclude=&from=2004-01-29&to=2004-01-29">search for this motion (S2M-828.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are five questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-828.1, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, which seeks to amend motion S2M-828, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on modernising the court system and a new supreme court, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>