division_name: [S3M-5619.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-5619.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-10/bb-01-28f.htm">bulletin on 2010-01-28</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-5619.3 Margaret Smith: Skills StrategyâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-5619) in the name of Keith Brown, leave out from "believes" to end and insert "regrets the Scottish Governmentâs failure to bring forward a revised Skills Strategy for debate, as was called for by the Parliament in September 2007; further regrets the ongoing confusion, bureaucracy and expense that has been caused by the establishment of the multi-million pound quango, Skills Development Scotland; notes the Scottish Governmentâs removal of specific funding for Skills for Work courses and school-college partnerships and the uncertainty over the future funding of the Determined to Succeed programme; recognises the valuable role of colleges in boosting skills and supporting lifelong learning, education and training, and notes the pressures facing colleges across Scotland due to an increased demand for places." Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-5619.3&exclude=&from=2010-01-28&to=2010-01-28">search for this motion (S3M-5619.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-5619.3, in the name of Margaret Smith, which seeks to amend motion S3M-5619, in the name of Keith Brown, on the skills strategy, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>