division_name: [S3M-1017] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-1017</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-12-12f.htm">bulletin on 2007-12-12</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-1017 Margaret Smith: Civil LibertiesâThat the Parliament believes that the fundamental liberties enjoyed by generations of our citizens must not be eroded; welcomes the commitment by the previous Scottish Executive that ID cards would not be needed to access devolved services and its proportionate position on DNA retention; is concerned at the threat to civil liberties from the UK Governmentâs expensive and unworkable proposal to introduce compulsory ID cards; believes that the Scottish Government should not put citizensâ privacy at risk by allowing the UK ID database to access personal information held by the Scottish Government, local authorities or other devolved public agencies; therefore calls on the Scottish Government to ensure that all data protection procedures are secure and that audit of data under its jurisdiction is independent of government and accountable to the Parliament, and takes the view that there should be no blanket retention of DNA samples and that the Assistant Information Commissioner for Scotland should have specific powers to carry out spot checks on the compliance by Scottish government agencies and bodies with the Data Protection Act 1998. 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-1017&exclude=&from=2007-12-13&to=2007-12-13">search for this motion (S3M-1017) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that motion S3M-1017, in the name of Margaret Smith, on civil liberties, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>