division_name: Housing and Planning Bill &#8212; [2nd Allocated Day] &#8212; Schedule 6 &#8212; Financial penalty as alternative to prosecution under Housing Act 2004
motion: <p class="" pid="b.794.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move,</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.794.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">That the Committee consents to the following certified clauses and schedules of the Housing and Planning Bill and certified amendments made by the House to the Bill:</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.807.0/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That the Bill be now read the Third time.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.807.0/2" pwmotiontext="yes">It is customary on these occasions to thank all those involved in the consideration and scrutiny of the Bill in question. On this occasion, I would like to pay particular tribute to the Minister for Housing and Planning for having moved so elegantly that historic motion for the first time in this House. I also commend the Leader of the House of Commons for giving us the opportunity to carry out our consideration of the Bill in this way. Throughout our proceedings, the debate has been rich and vigorous from beginning to end. Those of us who were here last week for the first day of its Report stage will know that there was no let-up in the passion&#8212;or indeed the number&#8212;of the contributions, despite the lateness of the hour.</p>
  
  <p pid="b.822.3/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Question put, </i>That the Bill be now read the Third time.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="b.822.3/2" pwmotiontext="yes">The House divided:</p>
  
  <p pid="b.822.3/3" pwmotiontext="yes">Ayes 309, Noes 216.</p>