division_name: [S2M-5109.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-5109.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-11-09f.htm">bulletin on 2006-11-09</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-5109.1 Carolyn Leckie: Violence Against WomenâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-5109) in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, insert at end "and, in so doing, expresses continuing concern at the despairingly low conviction rates for rape and sexual offences and the continuing humiliation that the majority of women complainants face through the courts allowing examination of victimsâ sexual history and character, and believes that the efforts of the Executive to address male violence against women must be supported by effective change in the criminal justice system." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-5109.1&exclude=&from=2006-11-09&to=2006-11-09">search for this motion (S2M-5109.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S2M-5109.1, in the name of Carolyn Leckie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-5109, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on violence against women, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>