division_name: [S3M-2204.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-2204.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-08/bb-06-19f.htm">bulletin on 2008-06-19</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S3M-2204.1 Bill Aitken: Youth JusticeâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-2204) in the name of Fergus Ewing, after "around" insert "notes with concern the failure of the previous administration to reduce persistent young offending by 10% and recognises the increasing drain on time and resources that offence referrals are having on the Scottish Childrenâs Reporter Administration (SCRA); recommends that an increase in disposals available to SCRA, such as an extension of drug treatment and testing orders, would enable it to intervene more effectively; recognises that the sending of 14 and 15-year-old persistent young offenders to youth courts would allow childrenâs panels to concentrate more on referrals for non-offence grounds." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-2204.1&exclude=&from=2008-06-19&to=2008-06-19">search for this motion (S3M-2204.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that amendment S3M-2204.1, in the name of Bill Aitken, which seeks to amend motion S3M-2204, in the name of Fergus Ewing, on youth justice, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>