division_name: Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill
motion: <p class="indent" pid="c387.4/2" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;The UK has a clear position on Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories: they are illegal under international law&#8221;.&#8212;[Official Report, <phrase class="date" code="">23 March 2023</phrase>; Vol. 730, c. 412.]</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="c388.1/4" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;has a chilling impact on Jews, a modern reminder of anti-Jewish boycotts. It also serves to legitimise the shunning of Jews from &#8216;decent&#8217; society. And having been shunned&#8230;that&#8217;s a half way house to all manner of more abusive and physical outcomes.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="c389.4/2" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;this House, while opposing any discrimination or prejudice in the economic activities of public bodies, believing that all such bodies must act without bias or selectivity when making ethical decisions on procurement and investment and recognising the impact selective and biased campaigns have had on the Jewish community in particular, declines to give a Third Reading to the Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill because it does not effectively address the problem it rightly seeks to solve, is incompatible with international law and UN Security Council Resolutions, risks undermining support for groups around the world facing persecution, includes needlessly broad and sweeping draconian powers while placing unprecedented restrictions on public bodies to express a view on current and proposed policy and represents a major departure from the UK Government&#8217;s long-established diplomatic position on the Occupied Palestinian Territories and Golan Heights, in a way that undermines the UK&#8217;s future credibility and capacity to support diplomatic negotiations towards a just and lasting peace in Israel and Palestine based on a two-state solution, at a time when consistent support for that objective is more important than ever.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="c392.1/3" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;The UK has a clear position on Israeli settlements: The West Bank, including East Jerusalem, Gaza and the Golan Heights have been occupied by Israel since 1967. Settlements are illegal under international law, constitute an obstacle to peace and threaten a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="c393.1/4" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;prevent public bodies from divesting from fossil fuel, as well as diverting their money away from inadvertently funding human rights abuses abroad, such as modern slavery in corporate supply chains.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="c395.2/3" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;I do not think we should bandy around terms like genocide&#8221;.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="c401.0/4" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;In practice, a public body seeking to comply with the Bill is likely to take steps to distance itself from anything which suggests that it holds any political or moral views as to the conduct of foreign states, for fear that it could be found to be in breach of the ban or the related prohibition on statements.&#8221;</p>