division_name: [S2M-1727.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-1727.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-09-22f.htm">bulletin on 2004-09-22</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-1727.1 David McLetchie: Holyrood Inquiry ReportâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-1727) in the name of Robert Brown, insert at end "and, in so doing, welcomes its findings and recommendations but regrets that, in its conclusions, it fails to place due emphasis on the principle of ministerial responsibility and accountability." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-1727.1&exclude=&from=2004-09-22&to=2004-09-22">search for this motion (S2M-1727.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that amendment S2M-1727.1, in the name of David McLetchie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1727, in the name of Rob Brown, on the Holyrood inquiry report, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>