division_name: [S2M-4477.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-4477.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-06-01f.htm">bulletin on 2006-06-01</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-4477.2 Michael Matheson: ArchitectureâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-4477) in the name of Patricia Ferguson, leave out from "both" to end and insert "our buildings have a critical role to play in maintaining and enhancing the quality of Scotlandâs urban and rural communities; notes the progress made to date on the Scottish Executiveâs policy on architecture; acknowledges the important role that local authorities have in promoting good architectural design, and believes that future national architectural policy should place greater emphasis on local authorities developing their own local architectural policy." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-4477.2&exclude=&from=2006-06-01&to=2006-06-01">search for this motion (S2M-4477.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S2M-4477.2, in the name of Michael Matheson, which seeks to amend motion S2M-4477, in the name of Patricia Ferguson, on architecture, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>