division_name: Prime Minister &#8212; Clause 112 &#8212; Bank levy: rates from 1 January 2014
motion: <p pid="d.354.1/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Amendment proposed</i>: 1, in clause&#160;112,&#160;page&#160;94,&#160;line&#160;1,&#160;at beginning insert&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="d.354.1/2" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8216;(1) Before bringing forward any further reform of the bank levy rates system, the Chancellor shall lay before Parliament a report considering the impact on the total receipts paid to the Exchequer since 2010 by&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="d.354.1/3" pwmotiontext="yes">(a) UK banking groups;</p>
  
  <p pid="d.354.1/4" pwmotiontext="yes">(b) building society groups;</p>
  
  <p pid="d.354.1/5" pwmotiontext="yes">(c) foreign banking groups; and</p>
  
  <p pid="d.354.1/6" pwmotiontext="yes">(d) relevant non-banking groups.</p>
  
  <p pid="d.354.1/7" pwmotiontext="yes">(2) The report will pay particular attention to receipts from&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="d.354.1/8" pwmotiontext="yes">(a) corporation tax;</p>
  
  <p pid="d.354.1/9" pwmotiontext="yes">(b) the bank levy; and</p>
  
  <p pid="d.354.1/10" pwmotiontext="yes">(c) bank payroll tax.</p>
  
  <p pid="d.354.1/11" pwmotiontext="yes">(3) A copy of the report in subsections (1) and (2) shall be laid before Parliament.&#8217;.&#8212;<i>(Cathy Jamieson.)</i></p>
  
  <p pid="d.354.1/12" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Question put, </i>That the amendment be made.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="d.354.1/13" pwmotiontext="yes">The Committee divided:</p>
  
  <p pid="d.354.1/14" pwmotiontext="yes">Ayes 217, Noes 286.</p>