division_name: [S1M-430.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-430.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-00/ab-01-19f.htm">bulletin on 2000-01-19</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-430.1 Phil Gallie: Sexual Offences (Amendment) BillâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-430) in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, leave out from "endorses" to end and insert "considers that the principles of equalising the age of consent for homosexual and heterosexual activity and creating a new criminal offence of breach of trust as set out in the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Bill considered by the UK Parliament in the 1998-99 parliamentary session fall entirely within the remit of the Scottish Parliament and on that basis agrees that these matters be judged only after full consultation with the Scottish people." Â  
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-430.1&exclude=&from=2000-01-19&to=2000-01-19">search for this motion (S1M-430.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The first question is, that amendment S1M-430.1, in the name of Phil Gallie, which seeks to amend motion S1M-430, in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, on the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Bill, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division. Those who wish to support Phil Gallie's amendment should press the yes button now.</p></p>