division_name: [S3M-4988] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-4988</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-10-07f.htm">bulletin on 2009-10-07</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-4988 Rhona Brankin: School BuildingsâThat the Parliament notes with concern that the Scottish Futures Trust has yet to fund a single new school building in Scotland despite the 2009 Scottish Estates Statistics revealing that around 150,000 pupils remain in schools classified as being in poor or bad condition; is dismayed that, after more than two years, the SNP government has identified only 14 schools to be built under its first school building programme, that none of these 14 schools will be open to pupils in this parliamentary term and only 55 will be built in total by 2018; further believes that the SNP governmentâs claims on the number of schools that it has commissioned are unsustainable given that its own School Estates Statistics reveal that a majority of schools built or substantially refurbished in the last two financial years were legacy PPP projects, and further believes that it is hypocritical for ministers to criticise PPP schools while praising them at their official opening and that the SNPâs record in government is falling far short of its 2007 election manifesto pledge to "match the current school building programme brick for brick, and offer an alternative funding mechanism through the Scottish Futures Trust". 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-4988&exclude=&from=2009-10-08&to=2009-10-08">search for this motion (S3M-4988) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that motion S3M-4988, in the name of Rhona Brankin, on school buildings, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>