division_name: Leaving the Eu: Business of the House
motion: <p class="indent" pid="e702.3/3" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;one of the most fundamental shifts in the relationship between the government and parliament.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="e703.4/3" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;the restrictions on the Prime Minister&#8217;s powers...may cause a no-deal exit&#8221;&#8212;[Official Report, House of Lords, <phrase class="date" code="2019-04-08">8 April</phrase> 2019; Vol. 797, c. 405.]</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="e704.0/2" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;We have been driven to this only in an extreme emergency&#8221;.&#8212;[Official Report, <phrase class="date" code="2019-03-27">27 March</phrase> 2019; Vol. 657, c. 342.]</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="e704.4/2" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;If we as a House are going to be asked to hand over day after day, we should know what we will be asked to vote on during those days.&#8221;&#8212;[Official Report, <phrase class="date" code="2019-04-01">1 April</phrase> 2019; Vol. 657, c. 809.]</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="e706.4/3" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;For the automotive sector, no deal is simply not an option. Hearing politicians promote a no deal does not fill any of our companies with confidence nor does it fill international investors with confidence. Our strong desire is that no deal be taken off the table.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="e706.4/5" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;Our members are quite blunt, they say that a no deal scenario would be nothing short of an act of economic vandalism&#8221;.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="e706.4/7" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;No deal is something our members are most unanimous about. 45 % say no deal would lead to redundancies.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="e706.4/9" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;No Deal would be disastrous for some sectors&#8230;It is frankly worrying that that we see it being put forward as a plausible scenario to leave without a deal in October.&#8221;</p>