division_name: [S1M-1404.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-1404.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-00/bb-11-30f.htm">bulletin on 2000-11-30</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-1404.1 Michael Matheson: District Courts-As an amendment to motion (S1M-1404) in the name of Phil Gallie, leave out from "detrimental" to end and insert "effect of the current industrial action on the operation of the Glasgow District Court; calls upon the Scottish Executive to ensure a speedy resolution of the dispute and, in the light of the current situation, further calls upon the Scottish Executive to publish an interim report from the current review of district courts in order that public confidence in the administration and operation of our judicial system is restored and to ensure that this report is made available to the Parliament." Supported by: Andrew Wilson*, Mrs Margaret Ewing*, Nicola Sturgeon*, Mr Andrew Welsh*, Brian Adam* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-1404.1&exclude=&from=2000-11-30&to=2000-11-30">search for this motion (S1M-1404.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that amendment S1M-1404.1, in the name of Michael Matheson, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1404, in the name of Phil Gallie, on district courts, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>