division_name: [S2M-695.4 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-695.4</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-03/bb-12-04f.htm">bulletin on 2003-12-04</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-695.4 Mr Mark Ruskell: Protecting Bathing Water Quality-As an amendment to motion (S2M-695) in the name of Allan Wilson, leave out from "commends" to end and insert "notes that while 2003 represents a record year for compliance with the Bathing Water Directive, some of Scotland's best bathing locations still fail to meet minimum standards; notes that compliance with the higher standards required by a revised European Directive will place further demands upon Scottish Water, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency and other bodies with responsibilities for water quality; further notes that other legislation also impacts on Scotland's bathing water quality, and urges the Scottish Executive to be mindful of these considerations and of the importance of integrated coastal zone management when it consults on the best strategy for protecting and enhancing Scotland's coastline." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-695.4&exclude=&from=2003-12-04&to=2003-12-04">search for this motion (S2M-695.4) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The eighth question is, that amendment S2M-695.4, in the name of Mark Ruskell, which seeks to amend motion S2M-695, in the name of Allan Wilson, on protecting bathing water quality, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>