division_name: [S3M-3726.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-3726.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-03-19f.htm">bulletin on 2009-03-19</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-3726.1 Kenny MacAskill: Police NumbersâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-3726) in the name of Richard Baker, leave out from "believes" to end and insert "notes that police officer numbers are at a record high; welcomes the findings of the Police Force Projection Study that show that by March 2011 police officer numbers will have increased by more than 1,000 over the March 2007 level and will reach between 17,275 and 17,484 officers; commends the Scottish Government for its investment in funding 1,000 additional recruits; further commends the eight Scottish police forces for delivering additional police officers, and calls on the Scottish Government to continue to maximise the total number of police officers through a combination of recruitment, retention and redeployment." Supported by: Fergus Ewing* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-3726.1&exclude=&from=2009-03-19&to=2009-03-19">search for this motion (S3M-3726.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The sixth question is, that amendment S3M-3726.1, in the name of Kenny MacAskill, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3726, in the name of Richard Baker, on police numbers, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>