division_name: [S2M-2776.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-2776.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-06-22f.htm">bulletin on 2005-06-22</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-2776.1 Bruce Crawford: Licensing (Scotland) BillâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-2776) in the name of Mr Tom McCabe, insert at end "but, in so doing, notes the concerns expressed by the Local Government and Transport Committee in its Stage 1 Report on the Bill that, in respect of the Financial Memorandum, it considered that more robust financial details were required and as a result the committee was not in a position to determine whether the Financial Memorandum was adequate." Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-2776.1&exclude=&from=2005-06-22&to=2005-06-22">search for this motion (S2M-2776.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are five questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-2776.1, in the name of Bruce Crawford, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2776, in the name of Tom McCabe, on the general principles of the Licensing (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>