division_name: [S1M-3375.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3375.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-09-12f.htm">bulletin on 2002-09-12</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-3375.1 Malcolm Chisholm: Acute Services ReviewâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-3375) in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, leave out from "considers" to end and insert "accepts that the status quo is not an option and that improvements and modernisation must be progressed as soon as possible in order to enhance the quality of care; recognises that this is a long-term plan which must be flexible enough to take account of changing service demands and developing medical practice; supports an on-going monitoring and review process that includes external independent audit by Audit Scotland on an annual basis; endorses a commitment to keep named services at Stobhill and Victoria over the next five years and to have this locally monitored; gives high priority to the acceleration of ambulatory care and diagnostics developments in consultation with local communities; recognises the particular concern over the number of accident and emergency departments and supports a review of this in two years time that involves staff, patient and community groups, Glasgow Health Council and the Scottish Royal Colleges, and welcomes current developments in the Scottish Ambulance Service which will include the near doubling of paramedics in Glasgow by 2005 and one paramedic in the crew of each front-line ambulance." Supported by: Mr Frank McAveety*, Mrs Mary Mulligan*
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3375.1&exclude=&from=2002-09-12&to=2002-09-12">search for this motion (S1M-3375.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S1M-3375.1, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3375, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, on the acute services review, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>