division_name: [S3M-788] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-788</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-11-07f.htm">bulletin on 2007-11-07</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-788 Jackie Baillie: Holding the SNP Government to AccountâThat the Parliament recognises the critical importance of the forthcoming three-year spending review to meeting the hopes and aspirations of the people of Scotland; welcomes the detailed scrutiny of the SNP Governmentâs spending plans by parliamentary committees as a central part of the budget process; believes that there should be the widest possible debate about the spending priorities for the next three years, and therefore resolves to set aside chamber time for individual debates on the budget priorities for each Cabinet Secretaryâs portfolio: Finance and Sustainable Growth, Health and Wellbeing, Education and Lifelong Learning, Justice and Rural Affairs and the Environment not later than the conclusion of Stage 2 of the budget process. 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-11-08f.htm">bulletin on 2007-11-08</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S3M-788 Holding the SNP Government to Account (lodged on 6 November 2007) Ms Wendy Alexander* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-788&exclude=&from=2007-11-08&to=2007-11-08">search for this motion (S3M-788) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The third question is, that motion S3M-788, in the name of Jackie Baillie, on holding the SNP Government to account, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>