division_name: Localism Bill
motion: <p class="" pid="b.558.3/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.558.3/2" pwmotiontext="yes">I am glad to see <phrase class="honfriend" id="uk.org.publicwhip/member/40206" name="Caroline Flint">the right hon. Member for Don Valley (Caroline Flint)</phrase> in her place. Had she not arrived, I might have raised a point of order myself to allow her to get here.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.565.0/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move an amendment, to leave out from "That" to the end of the Question and add:</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b.565.0/2" pwmotiontext="yes">"this House, whilst affirming its belief in the important principle of devolving power to local people and their elected representatives, declines to give a Second Reading to the Localism Bill because the proposed devolution of power to local authorities is undermined both by the extent to which the Bill hands powers to the Secretary of State to over-ride those devolved powers and by the extent of powers of the Secretary of State to direct local authorities in their governance arrangements, and because the community empowerment and neighbourhood planning sections of the Bill, which have been put together hastily and without adequate consultation with important stakeholders, would cause the planning functions of local authorities to become incoherent and ineffective and create new costly and complex systems of service procurement and would reduce the effectiveness of local authorities; and is strongly of the opinion that the publication of such a Bill should have been preceded by both fuller consultation and pre-legislative scrutiny of a draft Bill."</p>
  
  <p pid="b.655.4/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i> Question put, </i>That the amendment be made.</p>
  
  <p pid="b.655.4/2" pwmotiontext="yes"><i> The House divided:</i> Ayes 228, Noes 332.</p>