division_name: [S3M-3584.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-3584.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-03-05f.htm">bulletin on 2009-03-05</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S3M-3584.1 David McLetchie: National Planning Framework for Scotland 2 - Proposed FrameworkâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-3584) in the name of Duncan McNeil, insert at end "and endorses the recommendation of the Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee that the Scottish Government removes any technology-specific references from candidate national developments 8 and 9, and calls on the Scottish Government to amend the descriptions of these national developments to reflect this in the final version of the National Planning Framework for Scotland 2." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-3584.1&exclude=&from=2009-03-05&to=2009-03-05">search for this motion (S3M-3584.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The next question is, that amendment S3M-3584.1, as amended, in the name of David McLetchie, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3584, in the name of Duncan McNeil, on "National Planning Framework for Scotland 2: Proposed Framework", be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>