division_name: Financial Services (Regulation of Derivatives) &#8212; New Clause 9 &#8212; Rail passenger services
motion: <p class="" pid="b.221.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.221.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">I am obviously delighted to see that so many Members on both sides of the House take such a passionate and keen interest in Scotland&#8217;s railway services. We have had a great deal of support for the measure from the trade unions in Scotland. This is a simple, technical new clause. Most people think that the Scottish Parliament already has the ability to decide what the model of the franchise will be, and I am keen that the situation should be resolved&#8212;<i>[</i> <i>Interruption.</i> <i>]</i></p>
  
  <p pid="b.229.4/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Question put, </i>That the clause be read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="b.229.4/2" pwmotiontext="yes">The Committee divided:</p>
  
  <p pid="b.229.4/3" pwmotiontext="yes">Ayes 172, Noes 293.</p>