division_name: [S1M-3678] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3678</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-12-04f.htm">bulletin on 2002-12-04</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-3678 Mr Jim Wallace: The Future of Europe Convention - The Scottish Dimension-That the Parliament acknowledges the many benefits that the European Union has delivered for Europe and for Scotland, welcomes the establishment of the Convention on the Future of Europe as an open and innovative means of addressing the issues now facing the European Union; believes that, in light of experience, the European Union needs to become more effective, efficient, easier to understand, democratic, transparent and accountable; recognises the role that Sub-Member State Administrations can play in realising these objectives; welcomes the Scottish Executive's engagement with Scottish civil society to stimulate discussion and to seek views on the Future of Europe; welcomes the contribution that the Executive has made to the debate so far, and calls on the Executive to press the Convention to bring forward proposals for strengthening the profile of the Subsidiarity Principle in the EU treaties, adopting a new mechanism for enforcing it which allows for full Sub-Member State Administration involvement, making greater use of framework legislation, consulting Sub-Member State Administrations at an early stage of policy development, generating greater transparency in European decision-making and introducing financial impact assessments for legislative proposals. Supported by: Peter Peacock* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3678&exclude=&from=2002-12-05&to=2002-12-05">search for this motion (S1M-3678) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that motion S1M-3678, in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, on the future of Europe convention&#8212;the Scottish dimension, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>