division_name: [S1M-67.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-67.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-99/bb-23-06f.htm">bulletin on 1999-06-23</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-67.1 Mr Jack McConnell: As an amendment to the motion (S1M-67) in the name of Mr Alex Salmond leave out from "Parliament" to end and insert "supports the provision of high quality health, education, transport and other public services; agrees that public/private partnerships will continue to be one of the ways used to increase innovation and investment in public services where this approach represents best value; calls on the Executive to continue to work to improve the operation of public/private partnerships and seek opportunities for new types of partnership and flexible contracts which will allow assets, when appropriate, to revert to public ownership, and recognises its use in delivering high quality public services while protecting the interests of the community as indicated in the Partnership for Scotland." Â  
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-67.1&exclude=&from=1999-06-24&to=1999-06-24">search for this motion (S1M-67.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are five questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S1M-67.1, in the name of Mr Jack McConnell, which proposes an amendment to motion S1M-67, in the name of Mr Alex Salmond, on the privatisation of public services, be agreed to. Are we all agreed? </p>
  
  <p>No. </p>
  
  <p>There will be a division. Those who support Jack McConnell's amendment should press the yes button, or the others accordingly. </p></p>