division_name: [S3M-1017.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-1017.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-12-13f.htm">bulletin on 2007-12-13</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-1017.2 Patrick Harvie: Civil LibertiesâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-1017) in the name of Margaret Smith, leave out from "are secure" to "accountable to the Parliament" and insert "comply with the principles of data protection, namely that personal information must be fairly and lawfully processed, processed for limited purposes, adequate, relevant and not excessive, accurate and up to date, not kept for longer than necessary, processed in line with individualsâ rights, secure and not transmitted to other countries without adequate protection, and that audit of data under its jurisdiction is independent of government and accountable to the Parliament; further calls on the Scottish Government to review plans for Scottish Citizens Accounts on the basis of these principles". Supported by: Robin Harper* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-1017.2&exclude=&from=2007-12-13&to=2007-12-13">search for this motion (S3M-1017.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-1017.2, in the name of Patrick Harvie, which seeks to amend motion S3M-1017, in the name of Margaret Smith, on civil liberties, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>