division_name: Identity Cards Bill
motion: <p class="" pid="b.875.6/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their amendments 22J and 22K.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.875.6/2" pwmotiontext="yes">This is the fourth time that amendments to remove the automatic linkage between designated documents and identity cards have come back to us from the other place and I very much hope that it will be the last time. The amendments were tabled by Lord Armstrong of Ilminster, who sits on the Cross Benches. I have high regard for Lord Armstrong, his commitment to the constitution of this country and his knowledge of history relating to it. I know that he was trying to help to reach a constructive conclusion by tabling the amendments. However, as I have said before, the moment has passed for discussing the principle of linking designated documents and ID cards, and it simply would not be possible for the Government to accept a complete opt-out for people who apply for documents designated under the Bill from the requirement to be entered on the national identity register and issued with an identity card.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="b.890.4/1" pwmotiontext="yes">It being one hour after commencement of proceedings, Madam Deputy Speaker put the Question, pursuant to Order [<phrase class="date" code="2006-02-13" pwmotiontext="yes">13 February</phrase>].</p>
  
  <p pid="b.890.4/2" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 305, Noes 251.</p>