division_name: [S2M-4329.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-4329.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-05-04f.htm">bulletin on 2006-05-04</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-4329.3 Ross Finnie: Pledge Against New Nuclear Power Stations in ScotlandâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-4329) in the name of Shiona Baird, leave out from first "notes" to end and insert "appreciates the work of the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management; welcomes the position statement on its draft recommendations published by the committee on 27 April 2006; agrees that the review of options for the long-term management of radioactive waste, currently being undertaken by the committee, is the correct means of engaging Scotland on the crucial issue of finding a long-term management option for higher activity radioactive waste, and notes the Executiveâs position, as outlined in the Partnership Agreement, that it will not support the further development of nuclear power stations while waste management issues remain unresolved." Supported by: Rhona Brankin* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-4329.3&exclude=&from=2006-05-04&to=2006-05-04">search for this motion (S2M-4329.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S2M-4329.3, in the name of Ross Finnie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-4329, in the name of Shiona Baird, on a pledge against new nuclear power stations in Scotland, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>