division_name: [S1M-2163.1 (Amendment)] Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill: Stage 1
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-2163.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-09-06f.htm">bulletin on 2001-09-06</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-2163.1 Mr Adam Ingram: Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill-As an amendment to motion (S1M-2163) in the name of Sarah Boyack, leave out from "agrees" to end and insert "does not agree to the general principles of the Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill because it wishes first to examine the whole issue of bridge tolling and requests that the Transport and the Environment Committee stages an inquiry into the economic and legal impact of bridge tolls in Scotland and makes recommendations on what legislation, if any, is required." Supported by: Fiona Hyslop* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-2163.1&exclude=&from=2001-09-06&to=2001-09-06">search for this motion (S1M-2163.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The question is, that amendment S1M-2163.1, in the name of Adam Ingram, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2163, in the name of Sarah Boyack, on the general principles of the Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>