division_name: [S1M-2941.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-2941.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-03-27f.htm">bulletin on 2002-03-27</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-2941.2 Mr Kenny MacAskill: TourismâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-2941) in the name of Mike Watson, leave out from "welcomes" to end and insert "notes the damage caused to the tourism industry by the outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease and the events of 11 September 2001; further notes that the underlying problems of the high pound and high fuel costs remain; notes with concern that the Scottish Executiveâs Tourism Framework for Action 2002-05 contains no additional funding; calls on the Executive to promote marketing and accessibility for the sector, and further calls for action to open new air routes to Scotland and to make VisitScotland, not the British Tourist Authority, responsible for marketing Scotland abroad." 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-03-28f.htm">bulletin on 2002-03-28</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S1M-2941.2 Tourism (lodged on 26 March 2002) Michael Russell* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-2941.2&exclude=&from=2002-03-27&to=2002-03-27">search for this motion (S1M-2941.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The first question is, that amendment S1M-2941.2, in the name of Mr Kenny McAskill, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2941, in the name of Mike Watson, on tourism, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>