division_name: [S2M-3411.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-3411.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-10-26f.htm">bulletin on 2005-10-26</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-3411.2 Mr Brian Monteith: Report on Prioritisation of the Non-Executive Bills Unitâs WorkloadâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-3411) in the name of Mr Duncan McNeil, insert at end âwith the addition, subject to committee approval of the statement of reasons that further consultation is not necessary and once a successful proposal is lodged, of the Local Government Elections (Scotland) Bill, given that it received 26 signatures of support when previously lodged, is time-sensitive and would be a small piece of legislation requiring only three sections and one member of staff to assist with its progress.â Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-3411.2&exclude=&from=2005-10-26&to=2005-10-26">search for this motion (S2M-3411.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> In that case, I have to put the question. The first question is, that amendment S2M-3411.2, in the name of Brian Monteith, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3411, in the name of Duncan McNeil, on a report on the prioritisation of the non-Executive bills unit's workload, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>