division_name: [S1M-2344.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-2344.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-10-25f.htm">bulletin on 2001-10-25</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-2344.1 Sarah Boyack: Rail Investment-As an amendment to motion (S1M-2344) in the name of Andrew Wilson, leave out from "with the collapse" to end and insert "it has been a difficult time for the railway industry since the tragedy at Hatfield a year ago and welcomes the steps that the Executive is taking to meet the needs of Scotland's rail users; calls upon the Executive to continue its programme of record investment in the railways and its work to make sure that projects for enhancements to the rail network go ahead, building on the good partnership that exist across the railway industry in Scotland; also notes the recent placing into administration of Railtrack plc and the opportunity that this presents to re-examine the organisation of rail services across the UK; welcomes the Executive's commitment to work closely with Her Majesty's Government to ensure that Scotland has a full and proper input into the restructuring of the UK rail industry, and calls upon all concerned to develop an ownership and investment framework for Railtrack assets that maximises both public and national interest." Supported by: Lewis Macdonald* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-2344.1&exclude=&from=2001-10-25&to=2001-10-25">search for this motion (S1M-2344.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The first question is, that amendment S1M-2344.1, in the name of Sarah Boyack, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2344, in the name of Andrew Wilson, on railway investment, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>