division_name: [S1M-2674] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-2674</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-02-01f.htm">bulletin on 2002-02-01</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-2674 Mr Andy Kerr: Budget (Scotland) (No.3) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the Budget (Scotland) (No.3) Bill be passed. Supported by: Mr Jack McConnell*, Mr Jim Wallace*, Patricia Ferguson*, Peter Peacock* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-02-04f.htm">bulletin on 2002-02-04</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  S1M-2674 Mr Andy Kerr: Budget (Scotland) (No.3) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the Budget (Scotland) (No.3) Bill be passed. Supported by: Mr Jack McConnell, Mr Jim Wallace, Patricia Ferguson, Peter Peacock 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-2674&exclude=&from=2002-02-14&to=2002-02-14">search for this motion (S1M-2674) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The second question is, that motion S1M-2674, in the name of Andy Kerr, which seeks agreement that the Budget (Scotland) (No 3) Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>