division_name: [S1M-720.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-720.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-00/bb-04-05f.htm">bulletin on 2000-04-05</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-720.2 Gordon Jackson: Holyrood ProjectâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-720) in the name of Sir David Steel, leave out from "(a)" to end and insert "the report of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body on the Holyrood Project; approves its terms, and directs the Corporate Body to establish a progress group comprising representatives of the Parliament and relevant professionals to work with the Corporate Body to (a) finalise the design; (b) complete the project by the end of 2002 within a total budget of Â£195 million, and (c) report regularly, or as from time to time may be required, on progress including on expenditure to date and estimated completion costs to the SCPB and to members." Supported by: Tavish Scott*, Pauline McNeill*, Nora Radcliffe*, Marilyn Livingstone*, George Lyon*, Mr Jamie Stone*, Scott Barrie*, Mr Duncan McNeil*, Karen Gillon*, Lewis Macdonald*, Maureen Macmillan*, Paul Martin*, Rhoda Grant*, Bristow Muldoon*, Helen Eadie*, Elaine Thomson* Â  
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-720.2&exclude=&from=2000-04-05&to=2000-04-05">search for this motion (S1M-720.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that amendment S1M-720.2, in the name of Gordon Jackson, which also seeks to amend motion S1M-720, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>