division_name: Orders of the Day &#8212; New Clause 14 &#8212; Assessment of effects of taxation changes on different earnings groups
motion: <p class="" pid="b.108.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.108.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">I was a few minutes late because I went to check the letter board, hoping that I would have an answer to the question that I first tabled on <phrase class="date" code="2007-04-16">16 April</phrase> and retabled on <phrase class="date" code="2007-04-30">30 April</phrase>. On three occasions on the Floor of the House, I have asked why I had not received a reply. Perhaps, by leave of the House, I may be able to respond at the end of the debate, by which time I may be able to read the parliamentary answer giving us the information that we require. That information is by what amount our constituents will lose out by the abolition of the 10p standard rate of tax, and how many of them and which groups will be affected.</p>
  
  <p pid="b.122.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i> Question put, </i>That the clause be read a Second time:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="b.122.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes"><i> The House divided:</i> Ayes 67, Noes 269.</p>