division_name: [S2M-1117.4 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-1117.4</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-03-31f.htm">bulletin on 2004-03-31</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-1117.4 Robert Brown: The Failure of the BBC to Hand Over Tapes to the Fraser Inquiry-As an amendment to motion (S2M-1117) in the name of David McLetchie, leave out from "agrees" to end and insert "notes the current Holyrood Inquiry being conducted by The Rt Hon The Lord Fraser of Carmyllie QC as instigated by the First Minister and the Presiding Officer; encourages all those with an interest in the Inquiry to provide Lord Fraser with all required documentation and material and strongly encourages both the Inquiry and the BBC to arrive at a mutually acceptable resolution to the ongoing issue surrounding the availability of information from tapes of the Wark Clements Productions' programme entitled "The Gathering Place"; supports the independence of the BBC against political interference as a fundamental bulwark of our civil liberties, and believes that the Parliament would undermine the independence of the BBC by seeking to compel it to take any particular course of action but would nevertheless welcome a decision by the BBC to allow Lord Fraser appropriate access to the tapes." Supported by: Pauline McNeill*, Scott Barrie* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-1117.4&exclude=&from=2004-03-31&to=2004-03-31">search for this motion (S2M-1117.4) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The fifth question is, that amendment S2M-1117.4, in the name of Robert Brown, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1117, in the name of David McLetchie, on the failure of the BBC to hand over tapes to the Fraser inquiry, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>