division_name: Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill &#8212; <i>Commons Reasons and Amendments</i>
motion: <p class="italic" pid="a.1098.0/1" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">Motion B agreed.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="a.1098.0/2" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">Motion C</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="a.1098.0/3" pwmotiontext="unrecognized"> Moved by Lord Wallace of Tankerness</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1098.0/4" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">That this House do not insist on its Amendment 108 to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 108A.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1098.0/5" pwmotiontext="unrecognized"><b>Lords Amendment 108:</b> Schedule 3, page 57, line 14, at end insert&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1098.0/6" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">&#8220;Exclusions of background staff costs</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1098.0/7" pwmotiontext="lines">1A Nothing in sub-paragraphs (3) to (5) of paragraph 1 shall be taken as extending to any expenses incurred in respect of remuneration or allowances payable to any member of staff (whether permanent or otherwise) of the third party.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1098.0/8" pwmotiontext="unrecognized">COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="a.1098.0/9" pwmotiontext="bill">The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No 108 for the following reason&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.1098.0/10" pwmotiontext="unrecognized"><b>108A:</b><i>Because a third party&#8217;s expenditure on staff should not be excluded from the definition of &#8220;controlled expenditure&#8221; for the purposes of Part 6 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.</i></p>