division_name: [S2M-529.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-529.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-01-28f.htm">bulletin on 2004-01-28</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-529.1 Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill-As an amendment to motion (S2M-529) in the name of Peter Peacock, insert at end "but, in so doing, endorses the qualifications and recommendations referred to in paragraph 38 of the Education Committee's 2nd Report 2004 (Session 2), Stage 1 Report on Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill and calls on the Scottish Executive to address these during Stage 2 of the Bill." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-529.1&exclude=&from=2004-01-28&to=2004-01-28">search for this motion (S2M-529.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>Amendment S2M-529.1, in the name of Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, was not moved, so we go straight to the question on motion S2M-529. The question is, that motion S2M-529, in the name of Peter Peacock, on the general principles of the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>