division_name: [S1M-1008.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-1008.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-00/bb-06-15f.htm">bulletin on 2000-06-15</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-1008.1 Angus MacKay: Crime and PunishmentâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-1008) in the name of Phil Gallie, leave out from first "notes" to end and insert "continues to support the Executiveâs policies on law and order and commends the priorities identified in the Programme for Government being taken forward by the Executive, including combating drug misuse as set out in the Drugs Action Plan Protecting our Future and through the creation of the Scottish Drugs Enforcement Agency which will fund an additional 100 officers in local forces, tackling youth crime, particularly persistent offenders, as set out in the report Itâs a Criminal Waste: Stop Youth Crime Now and the Executiveâs response, helping witnesses by extending a volunteer Witness Service to all Sheriff Courts, and the injection of an additional Â£8.9 million for the police which is sufficient for forces to recruit a further 300 extra officers". Supported by: Mr Jim Wallace* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-1008.1&exclude=&from=2000-06-15&to=2000-06-15">search for this motion (S1M-1008.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The question is, that amendment S1M-1008.1, in the name of Angus MacKay, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1008, in the name of Phil Gallie, on crime and punishment, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>