division_name: [S1M-1918.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-1918.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-05-10f.htm">bulletin on 2001-05-10</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-1918.1 Mr John Home Robertson: HolyroodâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-1918) in the name of David McLetchie, leave out from "and now" to end and insert "and notes the good progress of the construction of the Holyrood Parliament Building; welcomes the fact that most of the tender packages have come in at prices in line with the cost estimates but recognises the effect of an above-average inflation rate in the construction industry in the Edinburgh area; further notes the identification of possible savings by the Holyrood Progress Group, which has led to unanimous decisions by both the Progress Group and the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body to authorise savings of Â£2.5 million, but endorses their firm commitment not to compromise the quality of Scotlandâs new Parliament Building; acknowledges the rigorous work of the Project Team and the Holyrood Progress Group to achieve good value for money, and directs them to continue to work towards the completion of the construction of the building in December 2002 as an internationally recognised home for our new democracy which will be a source of pride for people throughout Scotland." Supported by: Mr Jamie Stone* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-1918.1&exclude=&from=2001-05-10&to=2001-05-10">search for this motion (S1M-1918.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The fifth question is, that amendment S1M-1918.1, in the name of Mr John Home Robertson, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1918, in the name of David McLetchie, on Holyrood, be agreed to. Are we <place-holder colnum="670"/> agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>