division_name: [S2M-5355.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-5355.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-12-21f.htm">bulletin on 2006-12-21</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-5355.3 Mr Jim Wallace: TridentâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-5355) in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, leave out from "notes" to end and insert "rejects the case made by the UK Government in its White Paper on the future of the Trident nuclear missile system published on 4 December 2006 that the decision on a replacement for Trident needs to be made in early 2007 and calls on the UK Government not to go ahead with the proposals in the White Paper at this time." Supported by: Mike Rumbles*, Nora Radcliffe*, Euan Robson*, Mr Andrew Arbuckle*, Donald Gorrie*, Jeremy Purvis*, Iain Smith*, Margaret Smith*, Mr Jamie Stone*, Mike Pringle*, John Farquhar Munro* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-5355.3&exclude=&from=2006-12-21&to=2006-12-21">search for this motion (S2M-5355.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The third question is, that amendment S2M-5355.3, in the name of Jim Wallace, which seeks to amend motion S2M-5355, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, on Trident, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>