division_name: [S2M-2129.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-2129.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-12-09f.htm">bulletin on 2004-12-09</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-2129.1 Mr Ted Brocklebank: FisheriesâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-2129) in the name of Ross Finnie, leave out from "an outcome" to end and insert "urges the Minister for Environment and Rural Development to secure higher quotas and more days at sea to secure a future for our fishermen and their coastal communities, accompanied by an end to the discredited haddock permit scheme with no new restrictions for the nephrops sector, and calls on the Executive to support the view of the vast majority of Scottish fishermen that it is time to end the discredited Common Fisheries Policy and to regain national control of UK waters". 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-2129.1&exclude=&from=2004-12-09&to=2004-12-09">search for this motion (S2M-2129.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S2M-2129.1, in the name of Ted Brocklebank, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2129, in the name of Ross Finnie, on fisheries, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>