division_name: Trade Bill
motion: <p class="indent" pid="a611.3/7" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;A new UK/US Free Trade Agreement would provide a significant boost to our trade to this high-value market, create a global-competitive advantage for UK steel producers, and open up valuable new market opportunities.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a611.3/11" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;Protectionism almost always ends up making the protected industry weaker and less able to compete against foreign imports&#8230;Instead of protectionism, we should call it destructionism. It destroys jobs, weakens our industries, harms exports, costs billions of dollars to consumers, and damages our overall economy.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a614.1/2" pwmotiontext="yes">That this House recognises that upon leaving the European Union, the UK will need effective legislation to implement agreements with partner countries corresponding to international trade agreements of the European Union in place before the UK&#8217;s exit, to implement procurement obligations arising from the UK becoming a member of the Government Procurement Agreement in its own right, to set out the basis of a Trade Remedies Authority to deliver the new UK trade remedies framework, and to establish the powers for Her Majesty&#8217;s Revenue and Customs to collect and disclose data on goods and services exporters; but declines to give a Second Reading to the Trade Bill because it fails to set out proper procedures for Parliamentary consultation, scrutiny, debate and approval of future international trade agreements, fails to protect the principle of Parliamentary sovereignty in respect of the implementation of international trade agreements previously negotiated by the European Union and in respect of changes to existing government procurement regulations arising from the UK&#8217;s or other countries&#8217; accession to the Government Procurement Agreement, fails to establish sufficient scrutiny procedures to replace those that have pertained while the UK has been a member of the European Union, fails to guarantee that the UK&#8217;s current high standards and rights will be protected in future trade agreements, and fails to render the Trade Remedies Authority answerable to Parliament or representative of the full range of stakeholders who should be included in its membership.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a619.1/6" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;an international agreement that mainly relates to trade, other than a free trade agreement.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a629.0/4" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;adopt or maintain measures that treat a supplier or user of an interactive computer service as an information content provider in determining liability for harms related to information stored, processed, transmitted, distributed, or made available by the service, except to the extent the supplier or user has, in whole or in part, created, or developed the information.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a633.1/6" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;we will not accept any diminution in food hygiene or animal welfare standards&#8230; We are not leaving the EU to undermine European standards. We will not engage in any kind of dumping, whether commercial, social or environmental.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a645.0/6" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;The current processes are fundamentally undemocratic: Parliament has no guaranteed say on trade deals, and the government is not required to be transparent before or during trade negotiations.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="a645.0/8" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;In all of our trade negotiations, we will not compromise on our high environmental protection, animal welfare and food standards.&#8221;</p>