division_name: [S1M-3396.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3396.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-12-19f.htm">bulletin on 2002-12-19</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-3396.1 Alex Fergusson: Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) BillâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-3396) in the name of Ross Finnie, insert at end "but, in doing so, regrets that the provision in the bill of a right to buy for some tenants has already led to a significant reduction in the amount of land let under medium- and long-term arrangements, and believes that the enactment of such a provision will minimise land available for rent, including holdings under the new tenancies proposed in the bill, confining tenancies to those of a very short-term nature with a resultant negative impact on the management of the tenanted sector." Supported by: Alex Johnstone*, Murdo Fraser*
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3396.1&exclude=&from=2002-12-19&to=2002-12-19">search for this motion (S1M-3396.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S1M-3396.1, in the name of Alex Fergusson, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3396, in the name of Ross Finnie, on the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>