division_name: [S3M-1105.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-1105.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-08/bb-01-10f.htm">bulletin on 2008-01-10</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-1105.2 John Swinney: Spending Review 2007âAs an amendment to motion (S3M-1105) in the name of Iain Gray, leave out from "regrets" to end and insert "looks forward to the replacement of significant amounts of ring-fencing by single outcome agreements with local authorities that will support the achievement of national outcomes set out in the spending review; recognises that the effectiveness of the national outcomes and the removal of ring-fencing will require to be monitored, and looks forward to the continuation of full scrutiny of the Scottish Governmentâs budget in the Finance Committee and the Parliament as part of the budget process." Supported by: Bruce Crawford* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-1105.2&exclude=&from=2008-01-10&to=2008-01-10">search for this motion (S3M-1105.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-1105.2, in the name of John Swinney, as amended, which seeks to amend motion S3M-1105, in the name of Iain Gray, on the spending review 2007, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>