division_name: [S3M-3849.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-3849.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-04-02f.htm">bulletin on 2009-04-02</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-3849.2 Paul Martin: Antisocial Behaviour FrameworkâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-3849) in the name of Fergus Ewing, leave out from first "notes" to end and insert "believes that too many communities in Scotland are still blighted by antisocial behaviour and recognises that the Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Act 2004 was a response to these concerns; further believes that there should not be reduced use of legal remedies, which have been effective in providing individuals and communities with relief from the selfish activities of a minority; recognises that while the Antisocial Behaviour Framework is right to highlight good practice and preventative measures, such initiatives must be properly resourced; acknowledges that, while only a small minority of young people engage in antisocial behaviour, parental responsibility is crucial in addressing this problem, and believes in widening access to legal remedies for communities that wish to tackle problems of antisocial behaviour in their areas." Supported by: Richard Baker* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-3849.2&exclude=&from=2009-04-02&to=2009-04-02">search for this motion (S3M-3849.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-3849.2, in the name of Paul Martin, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3849, in the name of Fergus Ewing, on the antisocial behaviour framework, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>