division_name: [S1M-3067.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3067.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-05-08f.htm">bulletin on 2002-05-08</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-3067.2 John Scott: Sustainable Development - Meeting the Needs... Priorities, Actions and Targets for Sustainable Development in Scotland-As an amendment to motion (S1M-3067) in the name of Ross Finnie, leave out from first "believes" to end and insert "expresses its concern that the statement has not gone far enough, particularly in its indicator list given that, 27 months after first promised, 24 indicators have been selected but less than 50% have set targets; questions whether the indicator list therefore provides an adequate basis to measure progress; further believes that the inclusion of no less than 15 other consultations, strategies, forums and plans may hinder the long-term delivery of the new vision, and supports the development of a more focused action plan for the continuation of sustainable development in Scotland. 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3067.2&exclude=&from=2002-05-08&to=2002-05-08">search for this motion (S1M-3067.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The next question is, that amendment S1M-3067.2, in the name of John Scott, which seeks to amend Ross Finnie's motion S1M-3067, on sustainable development, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>