division_name: [S1M-3248.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-3248.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-02/bb-06-26f.htm">bulletin on 2002-06-26</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-3248.1 Nicola Sturgeon: Action on Waiting and Delayed DischargeâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-3248) in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, leave out from "delivering" to end and insert "the face of increasing in-patient and out-patient waiting times; is extremely concerned at the disturbing findings of the recent Audit Scotland report, Review of the management of waiting lists in Scotland; calls for deferred waiting lists to be abolished and for all patients to be given a maximum waiting time guarantee; supports the work of the National Waiting Times Unit but calls on the Scottish Executive to give a commitment that HCI will be used exclusively for NHS patients in Scotland, and supports more vigorous action on a range of fronts to reduce waiting times and the delays experienced by patients awaiting discharge from hospital." Supported by: Shona Robison* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-3248.1&exclude=&from=2002-06-26&to=2002-06-26">search for this motion (S1M-3248.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The second question is, that amendment S1M-3248.1, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3248, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on action on waiting and delayed discharge, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>