division_name: [S3M-3214.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-3214.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-01-15f.htm">bulletin on 2009-01-15</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-3214.3 Des McNulty: Forth CrossingâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-3214) in the name of John Swinney, leave out from "and welcomes" to end and insert "; expresses concern that the lack of prior consultation with the UK Government raises questions over the delivery of the project on time and on budget, and considers that the new bridge should be capable of operating on a multi-modal basis to ensure continuity of provision for public transport as well as private vehicles." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-3214.3&exclude=&from=2009-01-15&to=2009-01-15">search for this motion (S3M-3214.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-3214.3, in the name of Des McNulty, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3214, in the name of John Swinney, on the Forth crossing, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>