division_name: [S3M-1548.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-1548.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-08/bb-03-13f.htm">bulletin on 2008-03-13</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S3M-1548.3 Jim Hume: National ParksâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-1548) in the name of Michael Russell, insert at end "welcomes the quinquennial review as an opportunity to examine the operation of the park authorities and any proposed boundary changes; believes that the park authoritiesâ national body status and strong directly elected presence provides the parks with the freedom and flexibility to carry out their unique statutory objectives and to meet the needs of very different park areas across Scotland; considers that any attempt to roll up the park authorities with Scottish Natural Heritage would hamper the parksâ capability to achieve these objectives, would damage local accountability and democracy and could have serious conflict of interest ramifications, and therefore calls for the forthcoming strategic review of the national parks to retain the Loch Lomond and The Trossachs National Park Authority and the Cairngorms National Park Authority as national bodies with at least five directly elected board members." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-1548.3&exclude=&from=2008-03-13&to=2008-03-13">search for this motion (S3M-1548.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-1548.3, in the name of Jim Hume, which seeks to amend motion S3M-1548, in the name of Michael Russell, on national parks, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>