division_name: [S2M-4197.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-4197.3</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-06/bb-03-30f.htm">bulletin on 2006-03-30</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-4197.3 Tavish Scott: Bridge TollsâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-4197) in the name of Shona Robison, leave out from "agrees" to end and insert "notes the responses, analysis and conclusions set out in the recent consultation and review of Scotlandâs tolled bridges, including the Tay Road Bridge Joint Boardâs response; notes that the bridges review met all of the Boardâs requests, and recommends an examination of the economic, social and environmental impact and cost of retaining or removing tolls from the Tay and Forth bridges, on Fife and Dundee, the proposals for which will be reported on as soon as possible." Supported by: Ms Margaret Curran* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-4197.3&exclude=&from=2006-03-30&to=2006-03-30">search for this motion (S2M-4197.3) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p> The next question is, that amendment S2M-4197.3, in the name of Tavish Scott, which seeks to amend motion S2M-4197, in the name of Shona Robison, on bridge tolls, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>