division_name: Identity Cards Bill
motion: <p class="" pid="b.1641.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their amendments Nos. 16 and 22, and proposes the Government amendments (a) and (b) in lieu thereof.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.1641.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">The amendments are technical amendments to clause   8, making it clear that an application for an identity card must include or accompany one to be entered on the national identity register. We have already had one debate on the Lords amendments this week, on <phrase class="date" code="2006-03-13">Monday 13 March</phrase>, when the House rejected them for the second time. However, their lordships have again insisted on their amendments to remove the requirement for anyone obtaining a designated document such as a passport to register and be issued with an identity card.</p>
  
  <p pid="b.1659.5/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Question put,</i> That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their amendments Nos. 16 and 22, but does not insist on its amendment No. 22C and proposes amendments (a) and (b) in lieu thereof.</p>
  
  <p pid="b.1659.5/2" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 292, Noes 241.</p>