division_name: Opposition Day &#8212; [Un-Allotted Day] &#8212; Living Standards
motion: <p class="" pid="b.638.1/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move,</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.638.1/2" pwmotiontext="yes">That this House believes that next month&#8217;s Budget should include a real plan for jobs and growth in order to boost the stalled economy, help hard-pressed families, pensioners and small businesses, bring down unemployment, and so ensure that the deficit is brought down and done so in a fair way; notes that while the banks are receiving a tax cut this year, the Institute for Fiscal Studies analysis shows that families with children will lose an average of &#163;580 per year from tax and benefit changes coming into effect in 2012-13; further notes that up to 200,000 couples with children who work part-time face losing all their working tax credit of up to &#163;3,870 per year from April 2012 if they cannot increase their working hours to 24 hours per week, further squeezing family living standards; further recognises that, in addition to ending the principle of universal child benefit, the Government&#8217;s unfair and ill-thought-through changes to child benefit will mean that a family with two earners each earning &#163;40,000 would keep all its child benefit, but a single-earner family on &#163;43,000 would lose it all, at a cost of &#163;2,450 per year for a family with three children; and calls on the Chancellor to use extra revenue from tackling tax avoidance to cancel his changes to eligibility rules for working tax credits and announce in the Budget an immediate and urgent review of his changes to child benefit, to report before they come into effect in January 2013.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="b.679.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes">Question put.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="b.679.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">The House divided:</p>
  
  <p pid="b.679.2/3" pwmotiontext="yes">Ayes 220, Noes 284.</p>