division_name: [S3M-1018.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-1018.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-07/bb-12-13f.htm">bulletin on 2007-12-13</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-1018.2 Stewart Maxwell: Sport and Young PeopleâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-1018) in the name of Ross Finnie, leave out from "rejects" to end and insert "notes that sportscotland is under review as part of a wider review of the public sector delivery landscape; welcomes the intention to remove any duplication or unnecessary bureaucracy; believes that there should be a parliamentary debate on this matter following the outcome of the review; recognises the important role that sportscotland has played as an effective arms-length body for distributing both Treasury and lottery funding, as well as successfully performing important co-ordinating and strategic functions in the development of integrated sporting performance pathways; further notes the importance of grassroots sport and the opportunities that currently exist to increase participation and enhance sporting performance, in particular those presented by the London Olympics in 2012 and the Glasgow Commonwealth Games in 2014, and in this context believes that it is opportune to consider the effectiveness of current structures to ensure that they best meet the needs of Scottish sport." Supported by: Nicola Sturgeon* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-1018.2&exclude=&from=2007-12-13&to=2007-12-13">search for this motion (S3M-1018.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are six questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S3M-1018.2, in the name of Stewart Maxwell, which seeks to amend motion S3M-1018, in the name of Ross Finnie, on sport and young people be agreed to. I point out that, if the amendment is agreed to, Jamie McGrigor's amendment will be pre-empted. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>