division_name: [S2M-3657.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-3657.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-05/bb-12-01f.htm">bulletin on 2005-12-01</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-3657.1 Mr Ted Brocklebank: Sea FisheriesâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-3657) in the name of Ross Finnie, leave out from "an outcome" to end and insert "urges the Minister for Environment and Rural Development to press for significantly increased quotas for nephrops and monkfish, coupled with no reduction in haddock total allowable catch and the confirmation of the proposed pelagic quotas to secure a sustainable future for our remaining fishermen and processors, as well as for our beleaguered coastal communities, but ultimately believes that the only solution for the Scottish fishing industry is to leave the discredited Common Fisheries Policy and to regain national and local control of UK waters." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-3657.1&exclude=&from=2005-12-01&to=2005-12-01">search for this motion (S2M-3657.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The fifth question is, that amendment S2M-3657.1, in the name of Ted Brocklebank, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3657, in the name of Ross Finnie, on sea fisheries, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p> There will be a division.</p></p>