division_name: [S1M-569.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-569.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-00/ab-02-23f.htm">bulletin on 2000-02-23</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-569.1 Mr John Swinney: Modernising GovernmentâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-569) in the name of Mr Jack McConnell, insert at end "and agrees that the Scottish Executive should pursue a programme to obtain greater value from existing public expenditure in Scotland, that targets for modernisation should be set against which the Executive should be monitored to assess its performance and that the Executive should take all necessary steps to ensure open, accessible and accountable government. Supported by: Dorothy-Grace Elder*, Mr Kenny MacAskill*, Michael Matheson*, Mr Andrew Welsh* Â  
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-569.1&exclude=&from=2000-02-23&to=2000-02-23">search for this motion (S1M-569.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The first question is, that amendment S1M-569.1, in the name of Mr Swinney, which seeks to amend motion S1M-569, in the name of Mr McConnell, on modernising government, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>