division_name: [S1M-2545.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-2545.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-01/bb-12-13f.htm">bulletin on 2001-12-13</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S1M-2545.2 Mr Jim Wallace: Scottish Prison ServiceâAs an amendment to motion (S1M-2545) in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, leave out from first "notes" to end and insert "congratulates the staff and management of the Scottish Prison Service on their good work in maintaining secure custody and good order in Scotlandâs penal establishments; welcomes the partnership between management and staff to improve industrial relations through the voluntary industrial relations agreement; welcomes the prison serviceâs commitment to collaborating on an increasingly transparent basis with statutory and voluntary agencies to provide effective rehabilitation and through care, aimed at reducing re-offending; notes that investment has been made in upgrading the prison estate, but that more must be done; to that end, welcomes the Executiveâs open approach in planning to consult on the Prison Estates Review early in the new year, and agrees that work to upgrade the estate must deliver prisons capable of providing sufficient humane and secure accommodation while delivering value for money." Supported by: Dr Richard Simpson* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-2545.2&exclude=&from=2001-12-13&to=2001-12-13">search for this motion (S1M-2545.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The third question is, that amendment S1M-2545.2, in the name of Jim Wallace, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2545, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, on the Scottish Prison Service, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>