division_name: [S3M-3174.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S3M-3174.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-09/bb-01-08f.htm">bulletin on 2009-01-08</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S3M-3174.1 Richard Baker: Protecting Scotlandâs Communities - The Scottish Government Offender Management PlanâAs an amendment to motion (S3M-3174) in the name of Kenny MacAskill, leave out from "supports" to end and insert "expresses concern that the Scottish Governmentâs proposals for the abolition of six-month sentences are unworkable and will not improve community safety; agrees that it is right to seek to expand the provision of tough effective community sentences and payback but that to be effective such measures must be properly resourced and that this is not the case under current national and local funding settlements, and believes that any changes to the sentencing system must put first the delivery of justice and protecting the public." 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S3M-3174.1&exclude=&from=2009-01-08&to=2009-01-08">search for this motion (S3M-3174.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The next question is, that amendment S3M-3174.1, in the name of Richard Baker, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3174, in the name of Kenny MacAskill, on protecting Scotland's communities&#8212;the Scottish Government offender management plan, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>