division_name: Infrastructure Bill [Lords] &#8212; Clause 29 &#8212; Easements etc affecting land
motion: <p pid="d.654.1/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Amendment made: </i>85,&#160;page&#160;33,&#160;line&#160;35, leave out &#8220;which is&#8221; and insert</p>
  
  <p pid="d.654.1/2" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;the freehold interest in which was&#8221; &#8212;</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="d.654.1/3" pwmotiontext="yes">(Stephen </p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="d.654.1/4" pwmotiontext="yes">Williams</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="d.654.1/5" pwmotiontext="yes">.)</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="d.654.1/6" pwmotiontext="yes">This amends clause 29(11) with the effect that the amendments made by the clause do not apply to any freehold disposals of land made before commencement by the bodies to which the clause applies. Those amendments will apply to land in respect of which a lease was granted by those bodies before commencement.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="d.654.1/7" pwmotiontext="yes">Amendment proposed: 52,&#160;page&#160;34,&#160;line&#160;2, leave out clauses 30 to 32.&#8212;<i>(Roberta Blackman-</i><i>Woods</i>.)</p>
  
  <p pid="d.654.1/8" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Question put,</i> That the amendment be made.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="d.654.1/9" pwmotiontext="yes">The House divided:</p>
  
  <p pid="d.654.1/10" pwmotiontext="yes">Ayes 209, Noes 330.</p>