division_name: Restoration and Renewal (Report of the Joint Committee)
motion: <p class="indent" pid="b878.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">That this House has considered the report of the Joint Committee on Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster (HL Paper 41, HC 659 of Session 2016-17).</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/3" pwmotiontext="yes">That this House&#8211;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/4" pwmotiontext="yes">(1) affirms its commitment to the historic Palace of Westminster and its unique status as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, Royal Palace and home of our Houses of Parliament;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/5" pwmotiontext="yes">(2) takes note of the report of the Joint Committee on the Palace of Westminster 'Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster', HL Paper 41, HC 659;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/6" pwmotiontext="yes">(3) accepts that there is a clear and pressing need to repair the services in the Palace of Westminster in a comprehensive and strategic manner to prevent catastrophic failure in this Parliament, whilst acknowledging the demand and burden on public expenditure and fiscal constraints at a time of prudence and restraint;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/7" pwmotiontext="yes">(4) accepts in principle that action should be taken and funding should be limited to facilitate essential work to the services in this Parliament;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/8" pwmotiontext="yes">(5) agrees to review before the end of the Parliament the need for comprehensive works to take place.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/10" pwmotiontext="yes">That this House&#8211;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/11" pwmotiontext="yes">(1) affirms its commitment to the historic Palace of Westminster as the permanent home of both Houses of Parliament;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/12" pwmotiontext="yes">(2) takes note of the report of the Joint Committee on the Palace of Westminster 'Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster', HL Paper 41, HC 659;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/13" pwmotiontext="yes">(3) agrees that there is a clear and pressing need to repair the services in the Palace of Westminster in a comprehensive and strategic manner to prevent catastrophic failure; including steps to safeguard the safety of visitors, schoolchildren, staff and members;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/14" pwmotiontext="yes">(4) notes that works in the Palace should commence as early as possible in the next decade;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/15" pwmotiontext="yes">(5) authorises necessary preliminary work required to avoid unnecessary delay, without prejudice to a parliamentary decision on the preferred option;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/16" pwmotiontext="yes">(6) endorses the Joint Committee&#8217;s recommendation that a Sponsor Board and Delivery Authority be established by legislation to commission and oversee the work required, and the establishment of a joint Commission to lay estimates;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/17" pwmotiontext="yes">(7) agrees that steps be taken now to establish a shadow Sponsor Board and shadow Delivery Authority, and to ensure that its members have a range of relevant expertise;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/18" pwmotiontext="yes">(8) instructs the shadow Sponsor Board and Delivery Authority to undertake a sufficiently thorough and detailed analysis of the three options of full decant, partial decant and retaining a parliamentary foothold in the Palace during a full decant; to decide whether each option properly balances costs and benefits, and whether or not the identified risks can be satisfactorily mitigated; to prepare a business case for the preferred option for the approval of both Houses of Parliament; and thereafter to proceed to the design phase;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/19" pwmotiontext="yes">(9) instructs the shadow Sponsor Board and Delivery Authority to apply high standards of cost-effectiveness and demonstrate value for money, and to include measures to ensure: the repair and replacement of mechanical and electrical services, fire safety improvement works, the removal of asbestos, repairs to the external and internal fabric of the Palace, the removal of unnecessary and unsightly accretions to the Palace, the improvement of visitor access including the provision of new educational and other facilities for visitors and full access for people with disabilities;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/20" pwmotiontext="yes">(10) instructs the shadow Sponsor Board and Delivery Authority to ensure the security of Members, Peers, staff, and visitors both during and after the work;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b878.3/21" pwmotiontext="yes">(11) affirms that in any event the delivery option must ensure that both Houses will return to their historic Chambers after any essential period of temporary absence.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b879.0/5" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;beautifully built and structurally sound.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b884.0/2" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;We recognise that there is still work to be completed in order to validate our conclusions.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b895.0/3" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;You must be joking&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b895.0/5" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;In these days of food banks and austerity I am sickened that they are even thinking about this&#8221;.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b895.0/7" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;why are you even still in that place, it&#8217;s time to come home to your own Parliament here&#8221;,</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b901.1/2" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;There could be a major fire, there could be loss of life.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b913.0/5" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;If it were done when &#8217;tis done, then &#8217;twere well it were done quickly&#8221;.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b915.2/7" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;the idea that the debates&#8230;will not be a Decision in Principle but instead would give approval to a shadow Sponsor Board and shadow Delivery Authority and commission them to study further options before bringing the matter back to Parliament&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b915.2/9" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;envisages only essential work doing this Parliament followed by a further review before 2022 to consider the need for comprehensive works&#8230;We are dismayed by these developments and seriously concerned about the level of risk that is being tolerated.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b918.2/5" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;Nearly &#163;60 million was spent on essential work to the Palace during 2015/16, &#163;49 million was spent the year before that, and the backlog of essential repairs&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b918.2/7" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;estimated at more than &#163;1 billion in 2012&#8221;.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b918.2/9" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;in turn, the risk of system failure, is growing significantly over time. By 2020, some 40% of the mechanical and electrical plant&#8230;will be at an unacceptably high risk of failure. By 2025, it will be more than 50%.&#8221;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b925.4/4" pwmotiontext="yes">&#8220;funding should be limited to facilitate essential work&#8221;.</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b928.1/3" pwmotiontext="yes">That this House&#8212;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b928.1/4" pwmotiontext="yes">(1) affirms its commitment to the historic Palace of Westminster and its unique status as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, Royal Palace and home of our Houses of Parliament;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b928.1/5" pwmotiontext="yes">(2) takes note of the report of the Joint Committee on the Palace of Westminster &#8216;Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster&#8217;, HL Paper 41, HC 659;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b928.1/6" pwmotiontext="yes">(3) accepts that there is a clear and pressing need to repair the services in the Palace of Westminster in a comprehensive and strategic manner to prevent catastrophic failure in this Parliament, whilst acknowledging the demand and burden on public expenditure and fiscal constraints at a time of prudence and restraint;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b928.1/7" pwmotiontext="yes">(4) accepts in principle that action should be taken and funding should be limited to facilitate essential work to the services in this Parliament;</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b928.1/8" pwmotiontext="yes">(5) agrees to review before the end of the Parliament the need for comprehensive works to take place.&#8212;(Andrea Leadsom.)</p>
  
  <p class="indent" pid="b928.2/3" pwmotiontext="yes">'(2A) regrets that no detailed assessment has been carried out of the cost-effectiveness of relocating Parliament away from the Palace of Westminster, and calls for any future review to include such an assessment.'&#8212;(Pete Wishart.)</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="b928.2/5" pwmotiontext="yes">The House divided:</p>
  
  <p pid="b928.2/6" pwmotiontext="yes">Ayes 47, Noes 410.</p>