division_name: Justice and Security Bill [Lords]
motion: <p class="" pid="b.713.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes">I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p class="" pid="b.713.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">Since we first consulted on the Bill and during its passage through the House of Lords, it has aroused quite a bit of passion and debate among those interested in the subject. The first aim of my speech will be to try to satisfy the House that most of the passion and debate turns on the very important detail of the way in which the Bill&#8217;s processes will work. No doubt, the detail will be considered at great length in Committee rather than today. I believe that I can demonstrate that there is no real division on principle between the Government and most of the people who have debated this matter. The Government are just as committed as any other Member of either House of Parliament to the principles of justice being done in civil cases, the rule of law and the accountability of our intelligence agencies both to the courts and to Parliament. I believe that accountability will be improved by the Bill.</p>
  
  <p pid="b.801.2/1" pwmotiontext="yes"><i>Question put, </i>That the Bill be now read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="b.801.2/2" pwmotiontext="yes">The House divided:</p>
  
  <p pid="b.801.2/3" pwmotiontext="yes">Ayes 262, Noes 18.</p>