division_name: [S2M-1100] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-1100</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-03-26f.htm">bulletin on 2004-03-26</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S2M-1100 Cathy Jamieson: Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry* 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-03-29f.htm">bulletin on 2004-03-29</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S2M-1100 Cathy Jamieson: Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry 
  </p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-04/bb-04-26f.htm">bulletin on 2004-04-26</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   S2M-1100 Cathy Jamieson: Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-1100&exclude=&from=2004-04-28&to=2004-04-28">search for this motion (S2M-1100) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>There are five questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that motion S2M-1100, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, that the Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Scotland Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>