division_name: [S2M-126.1 (Amendment)] Parliamentary Bureau Motions
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S2M-126.1</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-03/bb-06-11f.htm">bulletin on 2003-06-11</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
  *S2M-126.1 Bill Aitken: Business MotionâAs an amendment to motion (S2M-126) in the name of Patricia Ferguson, afterâ "followed by 	Final Stage of the Robin Rigg Offshore Wind Farm (Navigation and Fishing) (Scotland) Bill" insertâ "Thursday 12 June 2003 deleteâ "3:30 pm	Executive Debate on Investing in Public Transport" and insertâ "3:30 pm	Statement by the Presiding Officer on Increased Costs of the Holyrood Building Project 4:00 pm	Statement by the First Minister on Inquiry into the Holyrood Building Project."" Supported by: David McLetchie*, Mr David Davidson*, Margaret Mitchell*, Mr Ted Brocklebank*, Lord James Douglas-Hamilton*, Alex Fergusson*, David Mundell*, Mrs Nanette Milne*, Alex Johnstone*, Mr Jamie McGrigor* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S2M-126.1&exclude=&from=2003-06-11&to=2003-06-11">search for this motion (S2M-126.1) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The question is, that amendment S2M-126.1, in the name of Bill Aitken, which seeks to amend motion S2M-126, in the name of Patricia Ferguson, on Parliamentary business, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p> No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>