division_name: [S1M-1404.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time
motion: <p>This looks like the vote on S1M-1404.2</p><p>The description in the <a href="http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/businessBulletin/bb-00/bb-11-30f.htm">bulletin on 2000-11-30</a> is:</p><p class="bulletin-quote">
   *S1M-1404.2 Iain Gray: District Courts-As an amendment to motion (S1M-1404) in the name of Phil Gallie, leave out from "and calls" to end and insert "; recognises that the Crown has worked to protect business in District Courts and that this has proved successful except in the case of Glasgow, and urges the suspension of further action affecting the courts." Supported by: Ben Wallace* 
  </p><p>You can <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=&phrase=S1M-1404.2&exclude=&from=2000-11-30&to=2000-11-30">search for this motion (S1M-1404.2) on TheyWorkForYou</a></p><p><b>Text Introducing Division:</b></p><p><p>The first question is, that amendment S1M-1404.2, in the name of Iain Gray, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1404, in the name of Phil Gallie, on district courts, be agreed to. Are we agreed?</p>
  
  <p>No.</p>
  
  <p>There will be a division.</p></p>