text_body: --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The No-voters changed the motion for debate from:</p>
  
  <p class="indent">This House notes that development of the Green Belt continues unabated under this Government; believes the Government's Communities Plan will be unsustainable and will damage the quality of life of millions of people in this country by concreting over green fields and destroying rural communities; further notes that the Government's targets for brown field development have actually led to the loss of green spaces in suburban areas through infill development; and further believes that communities through their local authorities, not remote regional bodies, should be able to decide the priorities for local development.</p>
  
  <p>to:</p>
  
  <p class="indent">This House applauds the Government for maintaining the amount of Green Belt in England and its pledge to maintain or increase the amount of Green Belt; notes that development of previously developed sites for housing has a crucial role in meeting local needs for housing in the Green Belt and welcomes the Government's crackdown on urban sprawl, by adopting a sequential approach to the release of land and planning growth where it is needed; supports its proactive approach in improving the sustainability of rural communities; applauds the Government's success in achieving its previously developed land target early and increasing average densities of new development, which have helped to take the pressure off green fields; applauds the Government for introducing new planning policies in <a href="http://www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/groups/odpm_control/documents/contentservertemplate/odpm_index.hcst?n=2562&l=2"> PPG17</a> to protect open spaces of value to the local community; and praises the Government for introducing the <a href="http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/20040005.htm"> Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004</a> to improve the speed and quality of decision making and place sustainability at the heart of the planning system, and for its new emphasis on community involvement, ensuring local people's views are an integral part of the plan making process.</p>
  
  <p>There was then a further vote to affirm this new motion.</p>
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  
  <p><i>Question put,</i> That the original words stand part of the Question:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 175, Noes 321.</p>
  
  