text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  London Local Authorities Bill - Clause 4 - Power to Require Name and Address for Council Officers, PCSOs and Accredited Individuals When Issuing FPNs
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  @ MP voted aye against giving authorised council officers, PCSOs and accredited civilians the power to require an individual's name and address when issuing fixed penalty notices.
  
  The majority of MPs voted to approve giving authorised council officers, Police Community Support Officers and people designated by a Chief Officer of Police under the  community safety accreditation scheme the power to require an individual's name and address when they are proposing to issue a council penalty charge notice. 
  
  The penalty charge notices in question are those provided for under [http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2007/2/part/4/crossheading/penalty-charges/enacted section 61 of the London Local Authorities Act 2007]
  
  MPs were considering the London Local Authorities Bill[1]. The amendment rejected in this vote was:
  
  :Amendment 9, leave out clause 4
  
  Clause 4, titled ''Power to require name and address '' had the effect described above. 
  
  * [1] [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2010-11/londonlocalauthoritieshl.html Parliament's webpage on the London Local Authorities Bill]
  * [2] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmprbill/lla/210411/10001--a.htm#4 Clause 4 of the London Local Authorities Bill as at the time of the vote]
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  