text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Digital Economy Bill - ISP obligations to take account of injunctions
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  The majority of Lords voted in favour of add to the list of obligations of internet service providers[1] the fact that it that it may also account of circumstances whereby injunctions  for preventing access to specified online locations for the prevention of online copyright infringement may be brought.[2]
  
  After introducing this amendment, he [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2010-03-03a.1453.7#g1455.1 explained] 
  
  :I apologise for the slightly artificial introduction of this amendment at this point in the proceedings. The use of a paving amendment, Amendment 120A, at this juncture is simply a result of the desire of the signatories to the amendment to ensure a proper debate in prime time in this House of the merits of Clause 17 and our proposed substitute for it.
  
  Clause 17 is entitled [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200910/ldbills/001/10001.13-19.html#j164 Power to amend copyright provisions].
  
  * [1] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200910/ldbills/001/10001.6-12.html#j151 Approval of code about the initial obligations], Digital Economy Bill, Clause 6
  * [2] [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2010-03-03a.1453.7#g1455.0 Lord Clement-Jones], House of Lords, 3 March 2010
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  