text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Subsidy Control Bill - Second Reading
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  @ MP voted aye for state subsidies for businesses subject to them being a proportionate and effective means of pursuing a policy, a last resort, and implemented in a way to minimise impacts on competition and investment.  
  
  @ MP voted no against state subsidies for businesses being required to be a proportionate and effective means of pursuing a policy, a last resort, and implemented in a way to minimise impacts on competition and investment.  
  
  The majority of MPs voted for state subsidies for businesses subject to them being a proportionate and effective means of pursuing a policy, a last resort, and implemented in a way to minimise impacts on competition and investment.  
  
  MPs were considering the Subsidy Control Bill.[1][2][3]
  
  The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:
  
  :That the Bill be now read a Second time.
  
  The Bill provided for state subsidies for businesses to be a proportionate and effective means of pursuing a policy, a last resort, and implemented in a way to minimise impacts on competition and investment.  
  
  
  --
  
  * [1] [https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3015/publications Parliament's webpage on the Subsidy Control Bill], Parliament.uk
  * [2] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-02/0135/210135.pdf Subsidy Control Billas introduced on 30 June 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [3] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-02/0135/en/210135en.pdf Explanatory notes to the Subsidy Control Billas introduced on 30 June 2021], Parliament.uk
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  