text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Counter-Terrorism Bill - Control orders only without prospect of prosecution - rejected
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  The majority of MPs voted against adding a new condition into the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005[1] which said that a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_orders control order] could only be made by the Secretary of State against an individual only when the Director of Public Prosecutions -- 
  
  :"has certified that certified that there is no reasonable prospect of successfully prosecuting the subject of the order for a terrorism-related offence"[2] 
  
  or the urgency of the case requires the order to be made without court permission.[3]
  
  * [1] [http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/ukpga_20050002_en_1#pb1-l1g2 Making of non-derogating control orders], Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005, Clause 2
  * [2] [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2008-06-10a.198.4#g200.0 Andrew Dismore MP], House of Commons, 10 June 2008
  * [3] [http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/ukpga_20050002_en_1#pb1-l1g3 Supervision by court of making of non-derogating control orders], Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005, Clause 3(1)(b)
  
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  