text_body: --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters rejected a new Clause that was inserted after Clause 11 of the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldbills/037/05037.13-17.html#j004B"> Prevention of Terrorism Bill</a> that would have required the Act (which this Bill would eventually become) to be reviewed by a committee of five members of the Privy Counsil (senior parliamentarians) within eight months of it becoming law.  </p>  
  
  <p>The text of this rejected Clause can be found under "Amendment No. 31" in the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldbills/041/05041.8-14.html"> list of Lords' amendments.</p> 
  
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p>Question accordingly agreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Lords amendment disagreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Lords amendments Nos. 12 and 13 disagreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Lords amendment No. 15 disagreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Lords amendment No. 17 disagreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Government amendments (a) to (f) to the words so restored to the Bill, agreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Lords amendment No. 22 disagreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Lords amendments Nos. 27 and 28 disagreed to.</p>
  
  <p><i>Lords amendment</i>: No. 31.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Motion made, and Question put, That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment.&#8212;[Mr. Heppell.]</p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 341, Noes 238.</p>
  
  