text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.i-iii.html"> Terrorism Bill</a> - Timetable (No. 2)
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>Those voting Aye were voting for a change to the timetable for debate on the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.i-iii.html"> Terrorism Bill</a>, from what it was set down in <a href="http://publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2005-10-26&number=71"> Division 71</a>.</p>  
  
  <p>[CHECK]The change was to give slightly more time than originally planned for the debate, to take account of divisions that were anticipated.  The most contentious <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.21-27.html#jM001"> Clause 23</a> (extension of period of detention to 90 days) would have a debate lasting three hours, and the debate over the remainder of the Bill would go on for a further three hours.  </p>
  
  <p>Those voting No were not necessarily in favour of keeping the original shorter timetable, many wanted much more time for debate and consideration to take place.</p>
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  