text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Lisbon Treaty - Accept the changes of terminology in the Lisbon Treaty
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  The majority Aye voters successfully carried the motion[1] that clause 3 of the [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2007-08/europeanunionamendment.html European Union (Amendment) Bill] should remain in the Bill.
  
  This Clause was particularly contentious as it was argued by the No-voters that it effectively confirmed the abolition of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Communities European Community] and its replacement by the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union European Union][2]. The effect of this, it was argued, was to increase the powers of the European Union to include common foreign and security policy and parts of criminal justice and policing.
  
  However, Jim Murphy MP argued that:[3]
  
  :'...our negotiated position has ensured the right to opt in or out on any amending measure, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schengen_Area Schengen]-building measures and transitional measures. Whenever there is a transition from former pillar three to the new pillar one Community method[4], in the new democratic architecture, we have a chance to opt in on each proposal. At the end of the five-year transitionary period,[5] we have the right to opt out en bloc, en masse, and can then apply to opt back in to each and every new measure.' 
  
  The European Union (Amendment) Bill implements the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Lisbon Lisbon Treaty] into UK law. The main aims of the Lisbon Treaty were to[6]:
  
  * Streamline EU institutions
  * Establish a permanent President of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Council European Council] (as of 16 March 2010 held by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Van_Rompuy Herman Van Rompuy])
  * Establish the post of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Representative_of_the_Union_for_Foreign_Affairs_and_Security_Policy High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy] (as of 16 March 2010 held by Catherine Ashton)
  * Give new powers to the EU over justice and home affairs
  * Remove the national veto in some areas such as energy security and emergency aid 
  
  ----
  
  * [1] [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debate/?id=2008-03-03c.1551.1 Motion on Clause 3], House of Commons, 3 March 2008
  * [2] [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debate/?id=2008-03-03c.1472.4 David Heathcoat-Amory MP], House of Commons, 3 March 2008
  * [3] [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debate/?id=2008-03-03c.1548.0 Jim Murphy MP], House of Commons, 3 March 2008
  * [4] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_pillars_of_the_European_Union The Three Pillars of the European Union] - (in this case Jim Murphy is referring to policy areas which come under the jurisdiction of the EU)
  * [5] After five years the UK will have to decide whether it is willing to accept the new powers of the EU in common policy areas, [http://www.alde.eu/fileadmin/files/Download/True-Guide-NEW.pdf The True Guide to the Treaty of Lisbon (p. 10)]
  * [6] [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6901353.stm BBC News Q&A: The Lisbon Treaty], 5 February 2010
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  