text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Prevention of Terrorism Bill - Rejection of Lords' Amendment - Human Rights Obligations
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters rejected the change proposed by the House of Lords to the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldbills/037/2005037.htm"> Prevention of Terrorism Bill</a>, as detailed under <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldbills/041/05041.15-20.html"> Amendment No. 40</a>, which deleted a set of lines across pages 17 and 18 on a version of the Bill I can't find, and replaced them with the paragraph: </p>  
  
  <p class="indent">The rules of court must comply with the United Kingdomâs obligations under <a href="http://www.hri.org/docs/ECHR50.html#C.Art6"> Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights</a>.</p>
  
  <p>This article guarentees right of free trial, right to hear charges brought against you, presumption of innocence until proven guilty, and other fundamental precepts of our Western judicial system.</p>  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p>Question accordingly agreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Lords amendment disagreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Lords amendment No. 39 disagreed to.</p>
  
  <p><i>Lords amendment:</i> No. 40.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Motion made, and Question put, That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment.&#8212;[Mr. Heppell.]</p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 317, Noes 233.</p>
  
  