text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Prevention of Terrorism Bill - Insisted Amendment - Privy Council Review
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters reaffirmed their vote earlier in <a href="http://publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2005-03-10&number=132"> Division 132</a> which reaffirmed their vote the day before in <a href="http://publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2005-03-09&number=125"> Division 125</a> which had evidently been overturned by the House of Lords.</p> 
  
  <p>This rejected proposal would have established a senior panel to review the operation of the <a href="http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/20050002.htm">Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005</a> after eight months and make a report to Parliament.</p>
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  class="italic">Motion made, and Question put,</p>
  
  <p class="indent">That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their amendments Nos. 27, 31 and 32 and on its amendments Nos. 27C and 27D in lieu and proposes amendment (a) in lieu.&#8212;<i>[Ms Blears.]</i></p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 310, Noes 207.</p>
  