text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Prevention of Terrorism Bill - Insisted Amendment - Privy Council Review
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters "insisted on" the result of their vote the day before in <a href="http://publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2005-03-09&number=125">Division 125</a>.</p>
  
  <p>The measures they rejected (for a second time) was a senior review of operation of the <a href="http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/20050002.htm"> Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005</a> after eight months that would make recomendations as the process of future legislation.  Such a review would be limited in that it could not review the <a href="http://publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2005-03-09&number=126">Sunset Clause</a>.  </p>  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  
  <i>The House having divided:</i> Ayes 327, Noes 212.</p>
  
  