text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmbills/018/05018.i-vii.html">Constitutional Reform Bill</a> - <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmbills/018/05018.14-20.html#j010"> Clause 37</a> - Juristiction of the Supreme Court
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>Those who voted Aye wanted to reverse the meaning of <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmbills/018/05018.14-20.html#j010"> Clause 37</a> of the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmbills/018/05018.i-vii.html">Constitutional Reform Bill</a>, which says: 
  
  <p class="indent">(1)The Supreme Court is a superior court of record.</p>
  	
  <p class="indent">(2)  An appeal lies to the Court from any order or judgment of the Court of Appeal in England and Wales in civil proceedings.</p>
  
  <p class="indent">(3) An appeal lies to the Court from any order or judgment of a court in Scotland if <i>an</i> appeal lay from that court to the House of Lords at or immediately before the commencement of this section.</p>
  
  <p>The few who voted Aye wanted to change the word "<i>an</i>" in the third paragraph to "<i>no</i>".  This would have removed the law in Scotland from the power of the new Supreme Court.</p>
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  