text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Higher Education (Basic Amount) (England) Regulations 2010 - amendment to motion
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  <p><i> Moved By Lord Triesman</i></p>
  
  <blockquote>Leave out from "that" to the end and insert: "this House regrets that the Government has failed to consult adequately with parents, students, higher education bodies, employers and local authorities on raising student tuition fees and to convince many people of the fairness and sustainability of its proposals for funding higher education; urges the Government to undertake more public consultation on the issue, including consultation with future graduates and their families who did not contribute to the consultation over the Browne review; further considers that there should be an independent impact assessment on (a) the financial consequences of the proposed fees on students from both lower and middle income families, and (b) the financial consequences of the proposed fees on women, including a full assessment of the impact of the fees on equalities and fairness, and further calls on Her Majesty's Government  to commission new research to analyse the probable impact on demand for university courses of fees being increased to the range of Â£6,000 to Â£9,000 per annum from students from lower and middle income families and women; and further considers that, prior to contemplating any increase to the basic amount specified in section 24 of the Education Act 2004, the Government should publish a White Paper on reform of higher education funding, allowing for consultation and for consideration of alternative proposals".
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  