text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Health and Care Bill - After Clause 148 - Dispute Resolution in Childrenâs Palliative Care
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  @ MP voted aye against requiring inclusive and informed meditation when there is a dispute between a parent of a child with a life-limiting illness and a doctor responsible for the childâs treatment.
  
  @ MP voted no to require inclusive and informed meditation when there is a dispute between a parent of a child with a life-limiting illness and a doctor responsible for the childâs treatment
  
  
  The majority of MPs voted against requiring inclusive and informed meditation when there is a dispute between a parent of a child with a life-limiting illness and a doctor responsible for the childâs treatment in relation to care focused on relieving pain rather than dealing with the cause(s) of the condition. 
  
  
  MPs were considering the Health and Care Bill.[1][2][3]
  
  The motion supported by a majority of MPs in this vote was:
  
  :That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 90.
  
  Lords amendment 90 began:[4]
  
  :Insert the following new Clauseâ
  :â''Dispute resolution in childrenâs palliative care''
  :(1) This section applies where there is a difference of opinion between a parent of a child with a life-limiting illness and a doctor responsible for the childâs treatment aboutâ
  :(a) the nature (or extent) of specialist palliative care that should be made available for the child, or
  :(b) the extent to which palliative care provided to the child should be accompanied by one or more disease-modifying treatments.
  :(2) Where the authorities responsible for a health service hospital become aware of the difference of opinion they must take all reasonable stepsâ
  :(a) to ensure that the views of the parent, and of anyone else concerned with the welfare of the child, are listened to and taken into account;
  :(b) to make available to the parent any medical data relating to the child reasonably required to obtain evidence to inform the parentâs proposals for the childâs treatment (including obtaining an additional medical opinion);
  :(c) to allow the provider of an alternative treatment that is being advocated by the parent to provide evidence, in person or remotely, to the mediation process and subsequently to the court;
  :(d) to demonstrate the reasons that significant harm would be likely to be caused by the proposed treatment; and
  :(e) where the two parties are unable to resolve their difference of opinion, to allow for a mediation process, acceptable to both parties, between the parent and the senior doctor with overall clinical responsibility.
  :(3) Nothing in subsection (2) requires, or may be relied upon so as to require, the provision of any specific treatment by a doctor or institution, and in particular nothing in subsection :(2)â
  :(a) requires the provision of resources for any particular course of treatment; or
  :(b) requires a doctor to provide treatment that the doctor considers likely to be futile or harmful, or otherwise not in the best interests of the child.
  :(4) In this sectionâ 
  :âchildâ means an individual under the age of 18;
  :âhealth service hospitalâ has the meaning given by section 275 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (interpretation);
  :âparentâ means a person with parental responsibility for a child within the meaning of the Children Act 1989.
  :(5) Nothing in this section affectsâ
  :(a) the principle of the best interests of the child,
  :(b) the law about the appropriate clinical practice to be followed as toâ
  :(i) having regard to the childâs own views, where they can be expressed; and
  :(ii) having regard to the views of anyone interested in the welfare of the child, whether or not a person concerned with the welfare of the child within the meaning of this section.â
  
  
  Explanatory notes to the amendment stated:[5]
  
  :Lords Amendment 90 would insert a new clause ('Dispute resolution in children's palliative care') into the Bill, which would aim to ensure that, where there is a difference of opinion between a parent of a child with a life-limiting illness and a doctor responsible for the childâs treatment, disputes will be able to engage effective mediation.
  
  --
  
  
  * [1] [https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3022 Parliament's webpage on the Health and Care Bill], Parliament.uk
  * [2] [https://bills.parliament.uk/publications/44008/documents/1051 Health and Care Bill as brought from the Commons, 24 November 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [3] [https://bills.parliament.uk/publications/44120/documents/1082 Explanatory notes to the Health and Care Bill as brought from the Commons, 24 November 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [4] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-02/0293/210293.pdf Lords amendments to the Health and Care Bill, 24 March 2022], Parliament.uk
  * [5] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-02/0293/en/210293en.pdf Explanatory notes to the Lords amendments to the Health and Care Bill, 24 March 2022], Parliament.uk
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  