text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Education and Inspections Bill  - Code for School Admissions - rejected
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  
  
  
  <p>The majority No voters rejected a <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2006-05-24a.1571.8">change</a> to the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/181/06181.i-vii.html">Education and Inspections Bill</a>, which would have deleted subsection (4) of <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/181/06181.25-31.html#j325a">clause 37</a>.</p>
  
  <p>Subsection (4) changes the terminology of subsection (3) of <a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts1998/ukpga_19980031_en_8#pt3-ch1-pb1-l1g84">section 84 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998</a>.</p>
  
  <p>The Bill, as it stood, would have required local education authorities, governing bodies of state schools, appeal panels and adjudicators <b>"to act in accordance with"</b> a code of practice decided by the Secretary of State on how they discharged their duties.</p>
  
  <p>This Conservative amendment, which was defeated, aimed to prevent this change in terminology so that the actors outlined above would merely be required <b>"to have regard to"</b> the Secretary of State's code of practice.</p>
  
  
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  