text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Armed Forces Bill - Clause 7 - Concurrent jurisdiction - Serious Crimes to be Tried in Civilian Courts
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  @ MP voted aye not to require allegations of murder, manslaughter, domestic violence, child abuse, rape and sexual assault with penetration by members of the armed services to generally be considered by civilian courts. 
  
  @ MP voted no to require allegations of murder, manslaughter, domestic violence, child abuse, rape and sexual assault with penetration by members of the armed services to generally be considered by civilian courts. 
  
  The majority of MPs voted not to require allegations of murder, manslaughter, domestic violence, child abuse, rape and sexual assault with penetration by members of the armed services to generally be considered by civilian courts. 
  
  MPs were considering the Bill Armed Forces Bill.[1][2][3]
  
  The motion rejected in this vote was:
  
  :That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 1.
  
  Lords amendment 1[4] stated:
  
  :Page 4, line 27, at end insertâ
  
  :â(4A) Guidance under subsection (3)(a) must provide that where offences of murder, manslaughter, domestic violence, child abuse, rape or sexual assault with penetration are alleged to have been committed in the United
  Kingdom, any charges brought against a person subject to service law shall normally be tried in a civilian court unless, by reason of specific naval or military complexity involving the service, the Attorney General consents to trial by court martial.
  
  Had it not been rejected this amendment would have impacted Clause 7 of the Bill[2] which provided for a new chapter to the Armed Forces Act 2006. The new chapter set out requirements for The Director of Service Prosecutions and the Director of Public Prosecutions (or Lord Advocate in Scotland, or Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland) to agree a protocol regarding the exercise of concurrent jurisdiction in connection with offences which took place in the United Kingdom and could be pursued under civilian law.  
  
  Those subject to service law are: members of the regular forces, at all times, and members of the reserve forces when they are on duty.[6] 
  
  
  --
  
  
  * [1] [https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/2822 Parliament's webpage on the  Armed Forces Bill 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [2] [https://bills.parliament.uk/publications/42219/documents/544 Armed Forces Bill as introduced to the House of Lords, 14 July 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [3] [https://bills.parliament.uk/publications/42275/documents/565 Explanatory notes to the Armed Forces Bill as introduced to the House of Lords, 14 July 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [4] [https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/2822 Lords amendments to the Armed Forces Bill, 30 November 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [5] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-02/0206/en/210206en.pdf Explanatory notes to the Lords amendments to the Armed Forces Bill, 30 November 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [6] [https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/52/part/19/chapter/1/crossheading/persons-subject-to-service-law Chapter 1 of the Armed Forces Act 2006], Legislation.gov.uk
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  