text_body: <p>The No-voters changed the motion for debate from:</p>
  
  <p class="indent">This House believes that all advice prepared by the Attorney-General on the legality of the war in Iraq should be published in full.</p>
  
  <p>to:</p>
  
  <p class="indent">This House notes the long-standing convention, followed by successive governments, that the advice of the Law Officers is given in confidence and is not disclosed publicly; notes, however, the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200203/ldhansrd/vo030317/text/30317w01.htm#30317w01_sbhd3">Answer given in the House of Lords by the Attorney General on 17th March 2003</a> which set out his view of the legal basis of the use of force against Iraq, and the letter of the same date from the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs to the Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee giving more detail of the legal position; and believes that the priority now for the Government is to help the Iraqi people rebuild Iraq.</p>
  
  <p>which then passed automatically.</p>
  