text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Iraq - Select committee inquiry - rejected
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  @ MP voted aye against a further inquiry into the war in Iraq.
  @ MP voted no for a further inquiry into the war in Iraq.
  The majority of MPs voted against a further inquiry into the war in Iraq.
  
  Those voting Aye put a new motion before the house to replace the one that was rejected in [http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2006-10-31&number=330 Division 330],  The new motion said:
  
  :This House, recognising that there have already been four separate independent committees of inquiry into military action in Iraq and recognising the importance of learning all possible lessons from military action in Iraq and its aftermath, declines at this time, whilst the whole effort of the Government and the armed forces is directed towards improving the condition of Iraq, to make a proposal for a further inquiry which would divert attention from this vital task.
  
  This motion then passed without a further vote.
  
  Of the "four separate independent" inquiries, three of them, [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmfaff/813/81302.htm The Foreign Affairs Committee - The Decision to go to war in Iraq] of July 2003, [http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/publications/reports/isc/iwmdia.pdf Intelligence and Security Committee - Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction  Intelligence and Assessments] of September 2003, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hutton_Inquiry The Hutton Inquiry] of January 2004 were held before it was established that Iraq lacked usable weapons of mass destruction and either avoided the question, or concluded that it was too early to tell. The fourth, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butler_Inquiry The Butler Review] of July 2004, did not have the support of the opposition parties who considered that its terms of reference were too narrow.
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  