text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - Consequential and transitional provision
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  
  
  @ MP voted aye  
  @ MP voted no 
  
  
  The majority of MPs voted 
  
  MPs were considering the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill[1].
  
  The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:
  
  :That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 43.
  
  Amendment 43[2] stated:
  
  :Page 14, line 14, leave out âthe Minister considers appropriateâ and insert âis necessaryâ
  
  Explanatory notes to the Lords amendment[3] stated:
  
  :Lords Amendment 43 would restrict a Minister of the Crown to making only such provisions that are necessary in consequence of the Bill.
  
  Clause 17(1) of the Bill[4] stated:
  
  :(1) A Minister of the Crown may by regulations make such provision as the Minister considers appropriate in consequence of this Act.
  
  
  ==
  
  
  * [1] [https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/europeanunionwithdrawal.html Parliament's webpage on the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill]
  * [2] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2017-2019/0212/hcb212withoutendorsement.15-18.html Page of Lords amendments sheet containing Lords amendment 43. Parliament.uk website, 16 May 2018]
  * [3] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2017-2019/0212/en/18212en14.htm Page of explanatory notes to the Lords amendments covering amendment 43, Parliament.uk website, 22 May 2018]
  * [4] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2017-2019/0079/lbill_2017-20190079_en_2.htm#pb6-l1g17 Clause 17 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill in the version of the Bill referred to in the Lords amendment]
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  