text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Care Bill - New Clause 11 - Human Rights Act to Apply to All Providers of Regulated Social Care
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  @ MP voted no against making it unlawful for any provider of regulated social care to act in a manner incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. 
  @ MP voted aye to make it unlawful for any provider of regulated social care to act in a manner incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.
  
  The majority of MPs voted against making it unlawful for any provider of regulated social care to act in a manner incompatible with the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Convention_on_Human_Rights European Convention on Human Rights]. It was already unlawful for public authorities to act in a manner incompatible with the convention rights.
  
  MPs were considering the Care Bill[1]. The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was:
  
  :(1) A person (âPâ) who provides regulated social care for an individual under arrangements made with P by a public authority, or paid for by a public authority, is to be taken for the purposes of subsection (3)(b) of [http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/section/6 section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998] (acts of public authorities) to be exercising a function of a public nature in doing so.
  :(2) This section applies to persons providing services regulated by the Care Quality Commission.
  :(3) In this section âsocial careâ has the same meaning as in the Health and Social Care Act 2008.â.
  
  
  ==
  * [1] [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2013-14/care.html Parliament's webpage on the Care Bill]
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  