text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill - New Clause 5 - Memorandum of Understanding on Roles of Chief Constables vs Police and Crime Commissioners
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  @ MP voted aye to require The Secretary of State to publish a Memorandum of Understanding on the Operational Responsibility of Chief Constables detailing where their actions shall be independent of the Police and Crime Commissioner.
  @ MP voted no against requiring The Secretary of State to publish a Memorandum of Understanding on the Operational Responsibility of Chief Constables detailing where their actions shall be independent of the Police and Crime Commissioner.
  
  
  The majority of MPs voted against requiring The Secretary of State to publish a Memorandum of Understanding on the Operational Responsibility of Chief Constables detailing where their actions shall be independent of the Police and Crime Commissioner.
  
  MPs were considering the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill[1]. The motion rejected in this vote was:
  :That the clause be read a Second time.
  The clause in question[2] required the publication of the Memorandum of Understanding
  
  
  * [1] [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2010-11/policereformandsocialresponsibility.html Parliament's webpage on the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill (now an Act)]
  * [2] [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2011-03-30b.402.1#g402.2 Official Record, House of Commons, 30 March 2011]
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  