text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Impact of the Spending Round 2013 on tax revenue
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  <p pid="a.807.2/1">I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.807.2/2">The Oppositionâs new clause 10 challenges the Chancellor to publish, within six months of Royal Assent, a review of the impact of last weekâs spending review announcements on tax receipts. Should the Government agree to undertake such a review, as we hope they will, we suspect that its conclusions would be pretty short, given the Chancellorâs comprehensive failure to deliver the economic boost that this country so desperately needs. It was a dead duck of a spending review, and it was even more disappointing, given the context in which it was made. The Chancellor did not want to come to the House to announce a spending review last week, but he was forced to announce a further Â£11.5 billion of spending cuts in 2015-6. Why? Because his economic plan has utterly and categorically failed.</p>
  
  <p pid="a.826.4/1"><i>Question put, </i>That the clause be read a Second time.</p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i></p>
  
  <p pid="a.826.4/3">Ayes 234, Noes 303.</p>
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  