text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Opposition Day - Housing Benefit - Deductions for those deemed to have excess bedrooms
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  @ MP voted aye for a reduction in housing benefit for social tenants deemed to have excess bedrooms. 
  @ MP voted no against a reduction in housing benefit for social tenants deemed to have excess bedrooms. 
  
  The majority of MPs voted to support the Government's action against the inequality of allowing social tenants to receive Housing Benefit for excess bedrooms while private tenants do not receive payments in respect of extra rooms. The action being referred to isn't mentioned in the amendment being voted on but is a reduction in housing benefit for social tenants deemed to have excess bedrooms. 
  
  MPs voted on an amendment proposed in the name of Prime Minister David Cameron MP (Witney, Conservative) and moved by Steve Webb MP (The Minister of State, Department for Work and Pensions; Thornbury and Yate, Liberal Democrat)[1]. The amendment deleted all the operative text from an opposition amendment [http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2013-11-12&number=126&display=policies&dmp=6670 which had previously been rejected], replacing the motion with:
  
  : This House
  :''notes'' the substantial structural deficit which was inherited from the previous Government and the need to get the nationâs finances back into shape; 
  :''further notes'' the need to bring expenditure on housing benefit under control; 
  :"further notes'' that the proposed reversal of this policy would cost the Exchequer around half a billion pounds a year;
  :''regrets'' any exaggeration and misrepresentation of the effects of the policy; 
  :''recognises'' the inequality of allowing social tenants to receive benefit for a spare bedroom whilst denying this opportunity to private tenants; 
  :''supports'' the Governmentâs action to deal with this unfairness whilst protecting vulnerable groups such as pensioners and providing substantial funding through Discretionary Housing Payments to local authorities to support other tenants who would otherwise be adversely affected; 
  :''further notes'' the Governmentâs continuing commitment to monitor the effects of the policy and the use of Discretionary Housing Payments; and 
  :''welcomes'' the potential beneficial impact of this policy on those living in overcrowded accommodation and the 2.1 million families on waiting lists.ââ
  
  
  An assessment of the impact of[2] introducing size criteria for working-age Housing Benefit claimants living in the social rented sector states: "The exchequer and taxpayers benefit as a result of benefit reductions to individuals"; this is balanced by potential higher costs to local authorities, and costs to individual claimants.  
  
  ==
  
  * [1] [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2013-11-12f.823.0#g832.2 Steve Webb (Thornbury and Yate, Liberal Democrat), House of Commons, 12 November 2013]
  * [2] [http://www.parliament.uk/documents/impact-assessments/IA11-022AD.pdf Impact Assessment of introducing size criteria for working-age Housing Benefit claimants living in the social rented sector]
  
  
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  