text_body: --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters failed to delete two lines from the definitions in clause 21 part (4) of the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmbills/049/2002049.htm"> Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill</a> which read: </p>
  
  <p class="indent">"international terrorism" does not include terrorism concerned only with the affairs of a part of the United Kingdom.</p>
  
  <p>This change was called Amendment 98, which appeared among the list of changes proposed by the Home Secretary at the start of the <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2001-11-21.369.0">debate on Clause 21</a>, which were passed without a vote.  This vote followed on the on <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debate/?id=2001-11-21.399.0"> this one amendment</a>.  It's possible that this vote was an opportunity to revert this one chosen change from among the entire list.  Oddly, the phrasing of the vote seems to be negated: the amendment <a href="http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/10024--e.htm#21">was made</a> and the Government MPs had voted against it, according to the record.  So there is a mistake somewhere here. </p>
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p><i>Question put,</i> That the amendment be made:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p><i>The Committee divided:</i> Ayes 177, Noes 361.</p>
  