text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Consumer Rights Bill - Secondary Ticketing Platforms - Require Publication of Seller ID and Full Ticket Details
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  @ MP voted aye against requiring ticket reselling websites to identify ticket sellers and carry full details of tickets including face value, seat numbers and more.
  @ MP voted no to require ticket reselling websites to identify ticket sellers and carry full details of tickets including face value, seat numbers and more.
  
  The majority of MPs voted against requiring ticket reselling websites to identify ticket sellers and carry full details of tickets including face value, seat numbers and more.
  
  MPs were considering the Consumer Rights Bill[1][2]
  
  The motion passed by the majority of MPs in this vote was:
  
  :That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 12.
  
  Lords amendment 12[3] sought to introduce a new clause to the bill titled '''Secondary ticketing platforms''' subclause (1) of which stated:
  
  :Secondary ticketing operators must, on the website on which tickets are offered for sale or transfer, provide information concerning the sellers of tickets so that sellers may be easily identified. 
  
  The clause also required the publication of "all relevant information"  relating to the ticket, including its face value and details of the seat (if any) the ticket relates to.
  
  
  * [1] [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2013-14/consumerrights.html Parliament's webpage on the Consumer Rights Bill]
  * [2] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2014-2015/0029/lbill_2014-20150029_en_1.htm Consumer Rights Bill as brought from the Commons (version to which amendments relate)]
  * [3] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2014-2015/0134/15134.pdf Lords amendments to the Consumer Rights Bill]
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  