text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Immigration Bill - Requirement to Appoint Child Trafficking Guardian to Apply to England and Wales Only
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  @ MP voted aye to require a child trafficking guardian to be appointed to represent the best interests of potential victims of trafficking in human beings everywhere in the UK, not just in England and Wales.  
  @ MP voted aye to require a child trafficking guardian to be appointed to represent the best interests of potential victims of trafficking in human beings just in England and Wales rather than in the whole of the UK.
  
  
  The majority of MPs voted to require a child trafficking guardian to be appointed to represent the best interests of potential victims of trafficking in human beings everywhere in the UK, not just in England and Wales. 
  
  
  MPs were considering the Immigration Bill[1]. The motion accepted in this vote was:
  
  :That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 24.
  
  Amendment 24 stated[2]:
  
  :Page 53, line 7, after â54â insert â, section (Child trafficking guardians for all potential child victims of trafficking in human beings)
  
  Had it not been rejected this would have added the above text to clause 69[4] of the Bill; subsection 3 of clause 69 originally stated:
  
  : (3) Section 54 and Schedule 6 extend to England and Wales only. 
  
  Had the Lords' amendment been accepted it would have added the section on Child trafficking guardians for all potential child victims of trafficking in human beings, that was introduced later[5] to the list of provisions only applying to England and Wales. 
  
  During the debate David Hanson MP suggested a system of appointing child trafficking guardians already existed in Scotland  
  
  :Trafficked children who arrive in Scotland value the care and support that they receive from their appointed guardians.
  
  ==
  
  * [1] [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2013-14/immigration.html Parliament's webpage on the Immigration Bill] 
  * [2] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2013-2014/0206/14206.1-7.html Lords' Amendments to the Immigration Bill - 9 April 2014]
  * [3] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2013-2014/0206/14206.15-18.html Page of Lords' Amendments to the Immigration Bill - 9 April 2014 containing amendment 24]
  * [4] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2013-2014/0084/lbill_2013-20140084_en_7.htm#pt7-l1g69 Clause 69 of the Immigration Bill on which the amendment would have had effect]
  * [5] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2013-2014/0098/lbill_2013-20140098_en_7.htm#pt6-pb1-l1g65 Clause of Immigration Bill on Child trafficking guardians for all potential child victims of trafficking in human beings]
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  