text_body: --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmbills/061/2005061.htm"> Prevention of Terrorism Bill</a>
  
  <p>This Bill was "read a first time" on 22 February (a day earlier).  Reading it a "second time" means it can proceed to the next stage of Parliamentary process where it is reviewed section by section in Committee, after which it can be read a "third time" and voted upon before being sent to the House of Lords.</p>
  
  <p>The relevant document quoted at the <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2005-02-23.333.0">start of the debate</a> (which took place over 6 hours) was <a href="http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/CACSIACEvidence.pdf"> Memorandums laid before the Constitutional Affairs Committee on the Operation of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), HC323-II</a>.  It's unusual for the process to move this quickly.</p>
  
   be read a second time.</p>
  (published the day before)
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p>Question accordingly negatived.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Main Question put forthwith, pursuant to <phrase class="standing-order" code="62">Standing Order No. 62 (Amendment on Second or Third Reading)</phrase>:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 309, Noes 233.</p>
  
  