text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.i-iii.html"> Terrorism Bill</a> - <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.1-7.html#jE002"> Clause 1</a> - Encouragement of Terrorism
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p><b>NOTE: THE CLERKS OF THE HOUSE HAVE CONFIRMED THEIR LIST OF NAMES, THOUGH IT DIFFERS FROM THE OFFICIAL COUNT FOR THE AYES OF 299.</b></p> 
  
  <p>Those voting Aye wished to add a phrase to the end of part (1) of <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.1-7.html#jE002">Clause 1</a> of the <a href="href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.i-iii.html"> Terrorism Bill</a>.  This was a brief but similar change to what was proposed in the <a href="http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2005-11-02&number=73"> last division</a>.</p>  
  
  <p>Clause 1(1) of the Bill says:</p>
  
  <p class="indent">A person commits an offence if (a) he publishes a statement or causes another to publish a statement on his behalf; and (b) ... he knows or... has reasonable grounds for believing that members of the public... are likely to understand it as a[n]... encouragement... of acts of terrorism...</p>
  
  <p>And the question was to append the phrase:</p> 
  
  <p class="indent">and intends that his statement shall have that effect</p>
  
  <p>which would have meant you couldn't break this law unintentionally.</p>
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  