text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Education and Inspections Bill  - Clause 37 - Code for School Admissions
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  <p>Those voting No rejected a <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2006-05-24a.1571.8">change</a> to the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/181/06181.i-vii.html">Education and Inspections Bill</a>, which would have deleted subsection (4) of <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/181/06181.25-31.html#j325a">clause 37</a>.</p>
  
  <p>Subsection (4) changes the terminology of subsection (3) of <a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts1998/ukpga_19980031_en_8#pt3-ch1-pb1-l1g84">section 84 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998</a>.</p>
  
  <p>The Bill, as it stood, would have required local education authorities, governing bodies of state schools, appeal panels and adjudicators "to act in accordance with" a code of practice decided by the Secretary of State on how they discharged their duties.</p>
  
  <p>This Conservative amendment aimed to prevent this change in terminology so that the actors outlined above would merely be required "to have regard to" the Secretary of State's code of practice.</p>
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  