text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Prevention of Terrorism Bill - Rejection of New Lords' Clause - Duration of Control Orders
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters rejected the insertion of a new clause the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldbills/037/05037.1-7.html#j1112> Prevention of Terrorism Bill</a>, which is refered to as "Amendment No. 9" in the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldbills/041/05041.1-7.html"> Lords' list of amendments</a>.  </p>  
  
  <p>The rejected clause would have given a 12 month time limit to any control order, although it could be renewed after that period, and required that the order specify the time that it would end.  In other words, they can't be issued for indefinite time periods.</p>
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  
  <p>Question accordingly agreed to.</p>
  
  <p><i>Lords amendment:</i> No. 9</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Motion made, and Question put, That the House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment.&#8212;[Mr. Heppell.]</p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 343, Noes 244.</p>
  
  