text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Identity Cards Bill
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>I beg to move, That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their amendments Nos. 16
  +and 22, and proposes the Government amendments (a) and (b) in lieu thereof.</p>
  
  <p>The amendments are technical amendments to clause   8, making it clear that an application for an identity card must
  +include or accompany one to be entered on the national identity register. We have already had one debate on the Lords
  +amendments this week, on Monday 13 March, when the House rejected them for the second time. However, their lordships have
  +again insisted on their amendments to remove the requirement for anyone obtaining a designated document such as a passport to
  +register and be issued with an identity card.</p>
  
  <p><i>Question put,</i> That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their amendments Nos. 16 and 22, but
  +does not insist on its amendment No. 22C and proposes amendments (a) and (b) in lieu thereof.</p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 292, Noes 241.</p>
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  