text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.i-iii.html"> Terrorism Bill</a> - <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.1-7.html#jE002"> Clause 1(2)</a> - Encouragement of Terrorism
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>Those voting Aye wished to delete subsection (2) of <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.1-7.html#jE002">Clause 1</a> of the <a href="href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.i-iii.html"> Terrorism Bill</a>.</p>  
  
  <p>Subsection (2) says:</p>
  
  <p class="indent">...[S]tatements that are likely to be understood by members of the public as indirectly encouraging... acts of terrorism... include every statement which-</p>
  
  <p class="indent">(a) glorifies the commission or preparation (whether in the past, in the future or generally) of such acts or offences; and </p>
  
  <p class="indent">(b) is a statement from which those members of the public could reasonably be expected to infer that what is being glorified is being glorified as conduct that should be emulated in existing circumstances.</p>
  
  <p>This is a clarification of subsection (1) which asserts that <i>direct</i> and <i>indirect</i> encouragement of terrorism is an offence.</p>
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  