text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - Schedule 7 - 
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  @ MP voted aye
  @ MP voted no
  
  The majority of MPs voted
  
  MPs were considering the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill[1].
  
  The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:
  
  :That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 125
  
  Lords amendment 125[2] stated:
  
  :Page 48, line 21, leave out paragraph 10 and insertâ
  
  :âPower to appoint âexit dayâ
  :10         A statutory instrument containing regulations under section 14 which appoint a day as exit day may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.â
  
  Had it not been rejected this amendment would have impacted Schedule 7 of the Bill, paragraph 10 in the version of the Bill referred to in the amendment stated:
  
  :Power to amend the definition of âexit dayâ
  
  10 A statutory instrument containing regulations under section 14(4) may not
  be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved
  by a resolution of, each House of Parliament. 
  
  
  
  * [1] [https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/europeanunionwithdrawal.html Parliament's webpage on the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill]
  * [2] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2017-2019/0212/hcb212withoutendorsement.32-38.html Page of amendment sheet containing Lords amendment 125, Parliament.uk website, 16 May 2018]
  * [3] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2017-2019/0079/lbill_2017-20190079_en_5.htm#sch7-pt2 Schedule 7, Part 2, of the Bill as referred to by the rejected amendment]
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  