text_body: --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters further changed one of the changes the House of Lords had made to the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldbills/037/05037.1-7.htm"> Prevention of Terrorism Bill</a>.</p>  
  
  <p>According to the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmbills/080/pla090305.htm"> records</a>, this was to insert the italicized words into the subclause 1(2):</p>
  
  <p class="indent">The power to make a control order against an individual shall be exercisable <i>(a) except in the case of an order imposing obligations that are incompatible with the individualâs right to liberty under Article 5 of the Human Rights Convention, by the Secretary of State; and (b) in the case of an order imposing obligations that are or include derogating obligations,</i> by the court on an application by the Secretary of State.</p>
  
  <p>This changes it so that the Secretary of State must apply to a court "derogating control orders" (ones that violate the Human Rights Convention), rather than for every "control order". </p>
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p>I beg to move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment.</p>
  
  <p><i>Question put,</i> That amendment (a) to Lords amendment No. 1 be made:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 348, Noes 240.</p>
  