text_body: --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters agreed that the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmbills/061/2005061.htm"> Prevention of Terrorism Bill</a> should be "read a Second time", which is Parliamentary speak for sending it to the next stage of the process where it is reviewed section by section in Committee, after which it is read a Third time (another debate and vote) before going to the House of Lords for further work.  </p>
  
  <p>This Bill was "read a first time" on 22 February (a day earlier) by the act of being printed.  The relevant document quoted at the <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2005-02-23.333.0">start of the debate</a> (which took place over 6 hours) was <a href="http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/CACSIACEvidence.pdf"> Memorandums laid before the Constitutional Affairs Committee on the Operation of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), HC323-II</a>.  It requires some sort of a crisis to cause the procedure to move this quickly.</p>
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p>Question accordingly negatived.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Main Question put forthwith, pursuant to <phrase class="standing-order" code="62">Standing Order No. 62 (Amendment on Second or Third Reading)</phrase>:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 309, Noes 233.</p>
  
  