text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill - Clause 1 - Seizure of passports etc from persons suspected of involvement in terrorism
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  MPs were considering the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill[1].
  
  The amendment rejected in this vote stated:
  
  :amendment 10, page 30, line 14, schedule 1, at end insertâ
  
  :â(c) the individual subject whose travel document has been removed may appeal against this decision in the courts over the evidence on which conditions in paragraph 2(1)(a) and (b) of this Schedule were met,
  :(b) the Secretary of State must by regulations make provisions about
  :(i) the relevant court;
  :(ii) a time limit by which an appeal must have been heard;
  :(c) the power to make regulations under this sectionâ
  :(i) is exercisable by statutory instrument;
  :(ii) includes power to make transitional, transitory or saving provision;
  :(d) a statutory instrument containing regulations under this section is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.â
  
  The MP proposing the amendment provided an explanation of its intended effect:
  
  :This amendment would create the right for an appeal in court following a temporary seizure of a passport, and requires the Secretary of State to set out in regulations a relevant court and time limit by which an appeal must have been heard.
  
  ===
  
  
  * [1] [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2014-15/counterterrorismandsecurity.html Parliament's webpage on the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill]
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  