text_body: --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters failed to make a <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debate/?id=2001-11-26.780.1">change</a> to Clause 97 (or <a href="http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/10024--k.htm#98">Clause 98</a> of the final Act) of the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmbills/049/2002049.htm"> Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Bill</a>.</p>
  
  <p>This clause extends the power of the MoD police to act as outside of their current territory and in civilian areas when invited by any other police constable.  The proposed change (which was rejected) inserted the phrase "[in relation to an offense] which he might reasonably assume to be terrorism" into that Clause.  Without this change, the law applies to all situations not involving terrorism.</p>
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p>I beg to move amendment No. 57, in page 59, line 18, after "offence", insert&#8212;</p>
  
  <p>'involving the use or threat of violence against any person'.</p>
  
  <p><i>Question put,</i> That the amendment be made:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p><i>The Committee divided:</i> Ayes 206, Noes 338.</p>
  
  
  