text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Contempt - Publication of Legal Advice on the European Union Withdrawal Agreement
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  
  
  
  @ MP voted aye against finding ministers in contempt for their failure to publish the legal advice provided by the Attorney General to the Cabinet concerning the European Union Withdrawal Agreement and not to order the immediate publication of the advice.
  
  @ MP voted no in favour of finding ministers in contempt for their failure to publish the legal advice provided by the Attorney General to the Cabinet concerning the European Union Withdrawal Agreement and to order the immediate publication of the advice.
  
  
  The majority of MPs voted in favour of finding ministers in contempt for their failure to publish the legal advice provided by the Attorney General to the Cabinet concerning the European Union Withdrawal Agreement and to order the immediate publication of the advice.
  
  MPs were considering the motion:
  
  :That this House
  :''finds'' Ministers in contempt for their failure to comply with the requirements of the motion for return [https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2018-11-13a.189.0#g232.0 passed on 13 November 2018], to publish the final and full legal advice provided by the Attorney General to the Cabinet concerning the EU Withdrawal Agreement and the framework for the future relationship, and
  :''orders'' its immediate publication.
  
  The amendment rejected in this vote was
  :leave out from âHouseâ to the end and insert:
  :ârefers to the Committee of Privileges the question of whether the Governmentâs response fulfils the motion passed on 13 November 2018 and requests the Committee to consider the constitutional and historic context and the proper use, ambit and scope of the motion for return procedure.â
  
  
  
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  