text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Subsidy Control Bill - Second Reading
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  
  @ MP voted aye for state subsidies for businesses to be a proportionate and effective means of pursuing a policy, a last resort, and implemented in a way to minimise impacts on competition and investment.  
  
  @ MP voted no against state subsidies for businesses being required to be a proportionate and effective means of pursuing a policy, a last resort, and implemented in a way to minimise impacts on competition and investment.  
  
  The majority of MPs voted for proposed subsidy control requirements public authorities are subject to when granting subsidies to an enterprise
  
  MPs were considering the Subsidy Control Bill.[1][2][3]
  
  The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:
  
  :That the Bill be now read a Second time.
  
  The Bill provided for state subsidies for businesses to be a proportionate and effective means of pursuing a policy, a last resort, and implemented in a way to minimise impacts on competition and investment.  
  
  
  --
  
  * [1] [https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3015/publications Parliament's webpage on the Subsidy Control Bill], Parliament.uk
  * [2] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-02/0135/210135.pdf Subsidy Control Billas introduced on 30 June 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [3] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-02/0135/en/210135en.pdf Explanatory notes to the Subsidy Control Billas introduced on 30 June 2021], Parliament.uk
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  