text_body: --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters failed to make a <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debate/?id=2001-11-26.780.1">change</a> to Clause 97 (or <a href="http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/10024--k.htm#98">Clause 98</a> of the final Act) of the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmbills/049/2002049.htm"> Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Bill</a>.</p>
  
  <p>This clause extends the power of the MoD police to act as outside of their current territory and into civilian areas <i>by request of any other police constable</i>.  The proposed change (which was rejected) inserted the phrase "[in relation to an offense] which he might reasonably assume to be terrorism" into that Clause.  Without this change, the law applies to all situations not involving terrorism.</p>
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p>I beg to move amendment No. 57, in page 59, line 18, after "offence", insert&#8212;</p>
  
  <p>'involving the use or threat of violence against any person'.</p>
  
  <p><i>Question put,</i> That the amendment be made:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p><i>The Committee divided:</i> Ayes 206, Noes 338.</p>
  
  
  