text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Higher Education Bill - Director of Fair Access to Higher Education
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  @MP voted aye to require universities charging the higher rate of tuition fees to plough back some of that extra income into outreach and financial support for students. 
  @MP voted no against requiring universities charging the higher rate of tuition fees to plough back some of that extra income into outreach and financial support for students. 
  
  The majority of MPs voted to require universities charging the higher rate of tuition fees to plough back some of that extra income into outreach and financial support for students. 
  
  The text of the approved motion was:
  :That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
  
  During debate Alan Johnston MP spoke about the amendment, No. 17[1], and said:
  :institutions must plough back some of that extra income into outreach and financial support for students 
  
  
  * [1] [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debate/?id=2004-06-23.1358.7 Alan Johnston MP, House of Commons, 23 Jun 2004]
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  