text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Prevention of Terrorism Bill - Rejection of Lords' Amendment - Rules of the Court
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters rejected the change made by the House of Lords to the Schedule of the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldbills/037/05037.18-23.html#j004Bs"> Prevention of Terrorism Bill</a> which would have removed three sub-paragraphs (see <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldbills/041/05041.15-20.html"> Amendment No. 38</a>) and replaced them with: </p>  
  
  <p class="indent">The relevant rules of court shall be made by the Lord Chief Justice after consulting the Lord Chancellor.</p>
  
  <p>(Unfortunately, I can't quite track down what those missing paragraphs said because there were further alternative amendments made by the Commons and the different versions of the Bill are not easy to track.)</p>
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p>Question accordingly agreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Lords amendment disagreed to.</p>
  
  <p><i>Amendments made:</i> (a) to (c) in lieu.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Lords amendment No. 37 disagreed to.</p>
  
  <p><i>Amendments made:</i> (a) to (o) in lieu of Lords amendments Nos. 8, 9, 12, 13, 15, 17, 22, 28 and 37.</p>
  
  <p><i>Lords amendment:</i> No. 38</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Motion made, and Question put, That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment.&#8212;Mr. Heppell.]</p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 326, Noes 231.</p>
  
  