text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Courts and Tribunals (Judiciary and Functions of Staff) Bill - Right of Appeal to a Judge in Respect of Judicial Decisions Taken by Staff
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  @ MP voted aye to give a right of appeal to a judge in respect of a judicial decision taken by an authorised member of staff.  
  
  @ MP voted no not to give a right of appeal to a judge in respect of a judicial decision taken by an authorised member of staff.  
  
  
  The majority of MPs voted not to give a right of appeal to a judge in respect of a judicial decision taken by an authorised member of staff.  
  
  MPs were considering the Courts and Tribunals (Judiciary and Functions of Staff) Bill[1] 
  
  The amendment rejected in this vote was:
  
  :Amendment 5, in the schedule, page 11, line 32, leave out subsection 67C and insertâ
  
  :â67C Right to judicial reconsideration of decision made by an authorised person
  
  :A party to any decision made by an authorised person in the execution of the personâs duty as an authorised person exercising a relevant judicial function, by virtue of section 67B(1), may apply in writing, within 14 days of the service of the order, to have the decision reconsidered by a judge of the relevant court within 14 days from the date of application.â
  
  
  :This amendment would grant people subject to a decision made under delegated powers a statutory right to judicial reconsideration.
  
  Had it not been rejected the amendment would have impacted paragraph 32 of the schedule to the Bill. 
  
  * [1] [https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/courtsandtribunalsjudiciaryandfunctionsofstaff.html Courts and Tribunals (Judiciary and Functions of Staff) Bill webpage, Parliament.uk]
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  