text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.i-iii.html"> Terrorism Bill</a> - Timetable (No. 2)
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>Those voting Aye were voting for a change to the timetable for debate on the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.i-iii.html"> Terrorism Bill</a>, from what it was set down in <a href="http://publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2005-10-26&number=71"> Division 71</a>.</p>  
  
  <p>(Check the following) The change was to give slightly more time than originally planned for the debate to take account of the divisions that were anticipated to take place on the aspects of the Bill.  The most contentious <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.21-27.html#jM001"> Clause 23</a> (extension of period of detention to 90 days) would have a debate lasting three hours, and the debate over the remainder of the Bill would go on for a further three hours.  </p>
  
  <p>Those voting No were not necessarily in favour of keeping the original shorter timetable, many wanted much more time for debate and consideration to take place.</p>
  
  
  
  <p pid="a.0.110/1">I beg to move,</p>
  
  <p pid="a.0.110/2">[lt]stickup1[gt]</p>
  
  <p class="italic" pid="a.0.139/1">Question put:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p pid="a.0.139/2"><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 317, Noes 213.</p>
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  