text_body: --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters reaffirmed their vote earlier in <a href="http://publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2005-03-10&number=136"> Division 136</a>, reaffirming <a href="http://publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2005-03-10&number=132"> Division 132</a> which reaffirmed their vote the day before in <a href="http://publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2005-03-09&number=125"> Division 125</a> which had evidently been overturned by the House of Lords.</p> 
  
  <p>This rejected proposal would have established a senior panel to review the operation of the <a href="http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/20050002.htm">Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005</a> after eight months and make a report to Parliament.</p>
  
  <p>It's not easy to find the compromises, which are amendments Nos. 27C, 27D and amendment (a).  A publically available (and readable) record of what exactly was going on is in shambles, and about as easy as reading the output from a paper shredder.  </p>  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  <p>Mr. Deputy Speaker<i> then proceeded to put the remaining Questions required to be put at that hour.</i></p>
  
  <p><i>Lords reasons:</i> 27F, 31D and 32E.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Motion made, and Question put, That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their amendments Nos. 27, 31, and 32 and on its amendments Nos. 27C and 27D in lieu, does not insist on its amendment No. 32D and proposes amendment (a) in lieu.&#8212;[Ms Blears.]</p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 307, Noes 203.</p>
  