text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - Schedule 1 - 
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  
  
  
  @ MP voted aye 
  @ MP voted no 
  
  The majority of MPs voted
  
  MPs were considering the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill[1].
  
  The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:
  
  :That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 52.
  
  Lords amendment 52 stated:
  
  :Page 16, leave out lines 11 to 15
  
  The section referred to is within Schedule 1 paragraph 1. The rejected amendment sought to delete Subsections 2(b) and (3) from paragraph 1 which stated:
  
  :Challenges to validity of retained EU law
  
  :1 
  :(1)There is no right in domestic law on or after exit day to challenge any retained EU law on the basis that, immediately before exit day, an EU
  instrument was invalid.
  :(2) Sub-paragraph (1) does not apply so far asâ
  :(a) the European Court has decided before exit day that the instrument is invalid, or
  :(b) the challenge is of a kind described, or provided for, in regulations
  made by a Minister of the Crown.
  :(3) Regulations under sub-paragraph (2)(b) may (among other things) provide for a challenge which would otherwise have been against an EU institution to be against a public authority in the United Kingdom. 
  
  
  
  
  ==
  
  
  
  * [1] [https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/europeanunionwithdrawal.html Parliament's webpage on the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill]
  * [2] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2017-2019/0212/hcb212withoutendorsement.15-18.html Page of Lords amendments sheet containing Lords amendment 52. Parliament.uk website, 16 May 2018]
  
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  