text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Loyal Address - Conservative amendment - rejected
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  The majority No voters rejected a Conservative amendment[1] to the [http://www.parliament.uk/faq/lords_stateopening.cfm Queen's Loyal Address]. The amendment would have added:
  
  * ''regret'' that the Gracious Speech does not contain measures to address the major challenges the British economy now faces to ensure its competitiveness in the light of unprecedented global competition
  * ''further regret'' the absence of measures to bridge the skills gap so that the UK has the right skills for tomorrow's economy
  * ''deplore'' the failure to include in the Gracious Speech a credible programme for cutting the burden of regulation which stifles business and holds back entrepreneurs
  * ''condemn'' the absence of measures to ensure value for taxpayers' money in order to improve public services and remove the need for further tax increases
  * ''further regret'' the absence of measures in the Gracious Speech to tackle the pensions crisis to which Government policy has contributed, or to encourage savings to help give people greater security and dignity in retirement.
  
  Those voting Aye were therefore supporting these criticisms; those voting No were disagreeing with them.
  
  ----
  
  * [1] [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debate/?id=2005-05-25b.708.5 George Osborner MP], House of Commons, 25 May 2005
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  