text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Trident Replacement - Amendment
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>Those voting Aye failed to change the motion for debate from: </p>
  
  <blockquote>This House supports the Government's decisions, as set out in the <a href="http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/CorporatePublications/PolicyStrategyandPlanning/DefenceWhitePaper2006Cm6994.htm">White Paper The Future of the United Kingdom's Nuclear Deterrent (Cm 6994)</a>, to take the steps necessary to maintain the UK's minimum strategic nuclear deterrent beyond the life of the existing system and to take further steps towards meeting the UK's disarmament responsibilities under <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty#Second_pillar:_disarmament">Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty</a>.</blockquote>
  
  <p>to:</p>
  
  <blockquote>This House notes the Government's decision, as set out in the <a href="http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/CorporatePublications/PolicyStrategyandPlanning/DefenceWhitePaper2006Cm6994.htm">White Paper The Future of the United Kingdom's Nuclear Deterrent (Cm 6994)</a>, to take the steps necessary to maintain the UK minimum strategic nuclear deterrent beyond the life of the existing system and to take further steps towards meeting the United Kingdom's disarmament responsibilities under <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty#Second_pillar:_disarmament">Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty</a>, but believes that the case is not yet proven and remains unconvinced of the need for an early decision.</blockquote>
  
  <p>This division was followed by a vote on the main motion.  Click <a href="http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2007-03-14&number=77&number2=78">here</a> to compare how MPs voted on the two divisions.</p>
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  