text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Armed Forces Bill - Clause 8 - Armed Forces Covenant
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  @ MP voted aye not to require the Government to have due regard to the special circumstances of current and former members of the armed services when exercising certain functions in relation to England.
  
  @ MP voted no to require the Government to have due regard to the special circumstances of current and former members of the armed services when exercising certain functions in relation to England.
  
  The majority of MPs voted not to require the Government to have due regard to the special circumstances of current and former members of the armed services when exercising certain functions in relation to England.
  
  MPs were considering the Bill Armed Forces Bill.[1][2][3]
  
  The motion rejected in this vote was:
  
  :That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 2.
  
  Lords amendment 2[4] stated:
  
  :Page 9, line 18, at end insertâ 
  :â(za) the Secretary of State;â
  
  
  Had it not been rejected this would have impacted Clause 8 of the Bill[2] titled: ''Armed forces covenant'' which set out a requirement for specified persons and public bodies, when carrying out certain specified functions to "have due regard to":
  
  :(a) the unique obligations of, and sacrifices made by, the armed forces,
  :(b) the principle that it is desirable to remove disadvantages arising for service people from membership, or former membership, of the armed forces, and
  :(c) the principle that special provision for service people may be justified by the effects on such people of membership, or former membership, of the armed forces. 
  
  The Lords amendment would have added the Secretary of State to the list required to have due regard to the matters set out. 
  
  Schedule 1 of the Interpretation Act 1978 provides that Secretary of State means "one of Her Majestyâs Principal Secretaries of State".[7] 
  
  The Armed Forces Covenant[6] states:
  
  :...the whole nation has a moral obligation to the members of the Naval Service, the Army and the Royal Air Force, together with their families. They deserve our respect and support, and fair treatment
  
  :Those who serve in the Armed Forces, whether regular or Reserve, those who have served in the past, and their families, should face no disadvantage compared to other citizens in the provision of public and commercial services. Special consideration is appropriate in some cases, especially for those who have given most such as the injured and the bereaved.
  
  --
  
  
  * [1] [https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/2822 Parliament's webpage on the  Armed Forces Bill 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [2] [https://bills.parliament.uk/publications/42219/documents/544 Armed Forces Bill as introduced to the House of Lords, 14 July 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [3] [https://bills.parliament.uk/publications/42275/documents/565 Explanatory notes to the Armed Forces Bill as introduced to the House of Lords, 14 July 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [4] [https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/2822 Lords amendments to the Armed Forces Bill, 30 November 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [5] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-02/0206/en/210206en.pdf Explanatory notes to the Lords amendments to the Armed Forces Bill, 30 November 2021], Parliament.uk
  * [6] [https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/578212/20161215-The-Armed-Forces-Covenant.pdf The Armed Forces Covenant], Gov.uk
  * [7] [https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1978/30/schedule/1 Schedule 1 of the Interpretation Act 1978], Legislation.gov.uk
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  