text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  MP's remuneration - Second package of reforms - rejected
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  The majority of MPs voted against the motion:[1]
  
  :This House notes [http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm74/7416/7416.asp Sir John Baker's Review of Parliamentary Pay and Allowances (Cm 7416)], and is of the opinion that the recommendation in paragraph 51 of the Review for increases over three years additional to those resulting from other uprating provisions should be implemented, such that the annual salary of a Member 5 of this House should be increased on each of 1st April 2008, 1st April 2009 and 1st April 2010 by a sum of Â£650 in addition to (and after) any other change taking effect from that date by virtue of any other resolution of this House.
  
  Insert paragraph 51 here.  
  
  MPs had also rejected the first package of reforms.[2]
  
  * [1] [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2008-07-03a.1089.6 Harriet Harman MP], House of Commons, 3 July 2008
  * [2] [http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2008-07-03&number=251 MP's remunerations - First package of reforms - rejected], House of Commons Division, 3 July 2008
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  