text_body: --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters agreed that Clauses 109 and 110 of the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmbills/049/2002049.htm"> Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill</a> (or, as they became, <a href="http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/10024--n.htm#111"> Clauses 111 and 112 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001</a>) should be part of the law.</p>  
  
  <p>These two clauses gave an authorized minister (Secretary of State, First Minister in the Scottish Parliament, etc.) the ability to make regulations to implement obligations arising from the <a href="http://www.europarl.eu.int/facts/4_11_1_en.htm">third pillar</a> of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maastricht_treaty"> Maastricht Treaty of Europe</a>, which is the part to do with cooperation in justice and home affairs.</p>
  
  
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p><i>Question put,</i> That clauses 109 and 110 stand part of the Bill:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p><i>The Committee divided:</i> Ayes 343, Noes 203.</p>
  