text_body: --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The No-voters changed the motion for debate from:</p>
  
  <p class="indent">This House notes with deep concern the increased levels of hospital-acquired infection and, in particular, that the incidence of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has doubled since 1997; welcomes the report by the National Audit Office <a href="http://www.nao.org.uk/pn/03-04/0304876.htm">'Improving Patient Care by Reducing the Risk of Hospital-Acquired Infection: a Progress Report' (HC 876)</a>; regrets the lack of timely action by the Government which this discloses, including higher bed occupancies and the resultant impact of Government waiting list targets on infection control measures, lack of surveillance data other than hospital-wide MRSA and post-discharge surveillance and isolation facilities, and lack of progress on a national infection control manual; is deeply concerned that recommendations for bed or ward closures by infection control teams have been refused; and calls on the Government now to act urgently to secure the action needed to reduce hospital-acquired infections.</p>
  
  <p>to:</p>
  
  <p class="indent">This House welcomes the Government's commitment to ensure that patients can have confidence that National Health Service hospitals are clean, safe environments with infection firmly under control; congratulates the Government on its action plans for reducing infection rates, 'Winning Ways' and <a href="http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4085649&chk=yph9nL"> 'Towards cleaner hospitals and lower rates of infection'</a>, which include the new target for a year-on-year reduction in MRSA, and the designation of directors of infection prevention and control to bring about local change; notes that the <a href="http://www.nao.org.uk/pn/03-04/0304876.htm">National Audit Office report</a> concluded that the introduction in 2001 of mandatory MRSA surveillance raised the profile of infection control with senior managers; expects that the new target will act in a similar way, and deplores therefore the suggestion that the target be abolished; acknowledges that improving patient safety is a difficult medical issue that calls for the hard work and care that is the hallmark of NHS staff; welcomes therefore the 77,500 extra nurses and almost 19,400 extra doctors that have become a part of patient care since 1997; and therefore congratulates the Government on a comprehensive programme of investment and reform that has equipped the NHS to deliver improvements in patient safety, and to reduce hospital-acquired infections.</p>
  
  <p>which was then subjected to a <a href="http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2004-09-08&number=240"> further vote</a> before being passed.</p>
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p><i>Question put accordingly,</i> That the original words stand part of the Question:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 190, Noes 307.</p>
  