text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill - Clause 89 - Searches, examinations and fingerprinting
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  <p>The Aye-voters failed to make a <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2001-11-26.743.0">series of changes</a> to Clause 89 (or <a href="http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/10024--k.htm#90"> Clause 90</a> of the final act) of the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmbills/049/2002049.htm"> Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Bill</a> which adds a new clause into the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.</p>
  
  <p>This Clause allows someone who is detained at a police station to be fingerprinted or searched for a birthmark that would identify them to the police.  The change that was proposed (and rejected) would have inserted in the phrase "in connection with a terrorist investigation" in several crucial parts of this law.  As it stands, this Act extends the power of the police in areas that are <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debate/?id=2001-11-26.747.4">unconnected with Terrorism</a>.</p>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p>I beg to move amendment No. 143, in page 47, line 17, after "station", insert&#8212;</p>
  
  <p>'in connection with a terrorist investigation'.</p>
  
  <p><i>Question put,</i> That the amendment be made:&#8212;</p>
  
  <p><i>The Committee divided:</i> Ayes 199, Noes 330.</p>
  