text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Crime and Courts Bill - Clause 12 - National Crime Agency - No Strike Provisions
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  @ MP voted no for a ban on anyone, for example a trade union, from calling a strike at the National Crime Agency and allowing the Home Secretary to seek an injunction to stop any threatened strike.
  @ MP voted aye against a ban on anyone, for example a trade union, from calling a strike at the National Crime Agency and against allowing the Home Secretary to seek an injunction to stop any threatened strike.
  
  The majority of MPs voted for a ban on anyone, for example a trade union, from calling a strike at the National Crime Agency and allowing the Home Secretary to seek an injunction to stop any threatened strike.
  
  
  
  MPs were considering the Crime and Courts Bill[1]. The amendment rejected in this vote was:
  
  :Amendment: 95, page 10, line 15, leave out Clause 12.
  
  Clause 12[2] titled ''NCA officers with operational powers: labour relations'' sought to prevent the Director General of the National Crime Agency or officers of the agency from being induced to strike (for example by a trade union). 
  
  Clause 12 also allows the Home Secretary to seek an injunction restraining a threatened strike by NCA officers holding operational powers.[3]
  
  
  * [1] [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2012-13/crimeandcourts.html Parliament's webpage on the Crime and Courts Bill (now an Act)]
  * [2] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2012-2013/0137/cbill_2012-20130137_en_3.htm#pt1-pb3-l1g12 Clause 12 of the Crime and Courts Bill as at the time of the vote]
  * [3] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2012-2013/0115/en/2013115en.htm Explanatory notes to the Bill]
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  