text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Bill - Second Reading - Database of Innovative Treatments - Departure from Accepted Practice
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  @ MP voted aye in favour of a database of innovative medical treatments and to state it is not negligent for a doctor to depart, responsibly, from accepted medical treatments.
  @ MP voted no against a database of innovative medical treatments and against saying it is not negligent for a doctor to depart, responsibly, from accepted medical treatments.
  
  The majority of MPs voted in favour of a database of innovative medical treatments and to state it is not negligent for a doctor to depart, responsibly, from accepted medical treatments.
  
  The majority of MPs taking part voted in favour of the second reading of the Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Bill[1][2] allowing it to continue on its path to becoming law. 
  
  The Bill:
  
  * Permits the establishment, by Government, of a database of innovative medical treatments carried out by doctors which would record the results of those treatments. The database would cover England only.
  
  * States : "It is not negligent for a doctor to depart from the existing range of accepted medical treatments for a condition if the decision to do so is taken responsibly."
  
  ==
  
  * [1] [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2015-16/accesstomedicaltreatmentsinnovation.html Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Bill ]
  * [2] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2015-2016/0008/en/15008en01.htm Explanatory notes to the  Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Bill ]
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  