text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Prevention of Terrorism Bill - Weak Sunset Clause
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters rejected "Lords amendment: No.33D" and proposed "amendments 33A to 33C" <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldbills/041/05041.8-14.html"> instead</a> to the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldbills/034/05034.i-iii.html"> Prevention of Terrorism Bill</a>.  </p>
  
  <p>I think this is the official rejection of the <a href="http://publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2005-03-09&number=126"> Sunset Clause</a>, and replacement with a weaker more complex version (see 33A in <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldbills/041/05041.8-14.html">this list of amendments</a>) that involves approval by a resolution in both Houses of Parliament after one year for the Act to continue in force.  This is merely a vote to keep the legislation on the books.  A full Sunset Clause requires for the legislation to go through the due process of debate, review, and exposure.  </p>
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p>Question accordingly agreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Lords Amendments Nos. 27B, 31B and 32B disagreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Amendments in lieu agreed to.</p>
  
  <p><i>Lords amendment:</i> No.33D</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Motion made, and Question put,</p>
  
  <p class="indent">That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment and proposes amendments 33A to 33C in lieu.&#8212;<i>[Ms Blears.]</i></p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 324, Noes 217.</p>
  
  