text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Iraq - Case for war not established - rejected
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  The majority of MPs voted against making a change to the motion before Parliament that declared war on Iraq.  The intact motion for war was voted through immediately after this amendment was rejected.[1]
  
  The change would have been to replace the sections of the motion which read:[2]
  
  **This House... 
  * ''notes'' that in the 130 days since Resolution 1441 was adopted Iraq has not co-operated actively, unconditionally and immediately with the weapons inspectors, and has rejected the final opportunity to comply and is in further material breach of its obligations under successive mandatory UN Security Council Resolutions;
  * ''regrets'' that despite sustained diplomatic effort by Her Majesty's Government it has not proved possible to secure a second Resolution in the UN because one Permanent Member of the Security Council made plain in public its intention to use its veto whatever the circumstances;
  * ''notes'' the opinion of the Attorney General that, Iraq having failed to comply and Iraq being at the time of Resolution 1441 and continuing to be in material breach, the authority to use force under Resolution 678[10] has revived and so continues today;
  * ''believes'' that the United Kingdom must uphold the authority of the United Nations as set out in Resolution 1441 and many Resolutions preceding it, and therefore supports the decision of Her Majesty's Government that the United Kingdom should use all means necessary to ensure the disarmament of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction;
  * ''offers'' wholehearted support to the men and women of Her Majesty's Armed Forces now on duty in the Middle East; 
  
  with:
  
  **This House...
  * ''believes'' that the case for war against Iraq has not yet been established, especially given the absence of specific United Nations authorisation; but, 
  * in the event that hostilities do commence, ''pledges'' its total support for the British forces engaged in the Middle East, expresses its admiration for their courage, skill and devotion to duty, and hopes that their tasks will be swiftly concluded with minimal casualties on all sides.
  
  * [1] [http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2003-03-18&number=118 Division 118], House of Commons, 18 March 2003
  * [2] [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2003-03-18.760.0#g779.2 Peter Kilfoyle MP], House of Commons, 18 March 2003
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  