text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  European Union (Withdrawal) Bill - New Clause 14 -  Report on Interpretation of Retained EU law During Transitional Period
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  @ MP voted aye to require a report on how retained EU law will be interpreted during a transition period between the UK withdrawing from the EU and a withdrawal agreement being implemented. 
  @ MP voted no not to require a report on how retained EU law will be interpreted during a transition period between the UK withdrawing from the EU and a withdrawal agreement being implemented. 
  
  The majority of MPs voted not to require a report on how retained EU law will be interpreted during a transition period between the UK withdrawing from the EU and a withdrawal agreement being implemented. 
  
  MPs were considering the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill[1].
  
  The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was titled: ''Interpretation of retained EU law during transitional period'' and stated:
  
  âWithin one month of Royal Assent of this Act the Secretary of State shall lay a report before Parliament setting out how the interpretation of retained EU law provisions in [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2017-2019/0005/cbill_2017-20190005_en_2.htm#pb2-l1g6 section 6] shall operate in the event of a transitional period being agreed between the United Kingdom and the European Union ahead of the implementation of a withdrawal agreement.â
  
  The rejected clause was accompanied by an explanatory notice stating:
  
  :This new clause would ensure that Ministers must set out in detail how the provisions in Clause 6 would apply during a transitional period before the United Kingdom fully implements a withdrawal agreement.
  
  
  ==
  
  * [1] [https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/europeanunionwithdrawal.html Parliament's webpage on the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill]
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  