text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill - Third Reading
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  
  
  @ MP voted aye in favour of new arrangements for the authorisation of the deprivation of people's liberty in the context of health and social care.
  @ MP voted no against proposed arrangements for the authorisation of the deprivation of people's liberty in the context of health and social care.
  
  
  
  The majority of MPs voted in favour of new arrangements for the authorisation of the deprivation of people's liberty in the context of health and social care.
  
  MPs were considering the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill[1][2]. 
  
  The Bill provided for responsible bodies (councils, hospital managers, or NHS organisations) to authorise arrangements giving rise to a deprivation of a personâs liberty, with authorisations in some cases based on statements by care home managers. The Bill also provided for arrangements relating to advocacy for those subject to deprivation of liberty. 
  
  
  The motion supported by the majority of MPs was:
  
  :That the Bill be now read the Third time.
  
  support for the motion enabled the Bill to continue on its path to becoming law. 
  
  * [1] [https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/mentalcapacityamendment.html Parliament's webpage on the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill, Parliament.uk]
  * [2] [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2017-2019/0303/en/18303en01.htm Explanatory notes to the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill, Parliament.uk]
  
  
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  