text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  Vehicle Excise Duty - planned increases should be abandoned - rejected
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  
  The majority of MPs voted against the motion before Parliament, which read:[1]
  
  **This House 
  * ''notes'' with concern the increases in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_excise_duty Vehicle Excise Duty] (VED) imposed in the Budget; 
  * ''notes'' that between 2006 and 2010 revenues from graduated VED will have more than doubled; 
  * ''observes'' that the majority of motorists who currently pay graduated VED will now pay more; 
  * ''deplores'' the Government's decision to abolish the exemption from higher graduated VED rates for cars that emit more than 186g of carbon dioxide per kilometre and were registered between March 2001 and March 2006, and the fact that this was not stated clearly at the time of the Budget; 
  * ''considers'' that these changes will hit those on low incomes hardest and be a further burden on hard-working families already struggling to cope with soaring living costs; 
  * ''further'' notes that, although graduated VED revenues will total Â£4.4 billion by 2010-11, carbon emissions from motoring are expected to reduce by less than 1% as a result of the new VED regime; 
  * ''believes'' that any increases in environmental taxes should be offset by tax reductions elsewhere; and 
  * ''calls'' upon the Government to abandon its planned increases in VED.
  
  There was no alternative motion put in its place
  
  * [1] [http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2008-05-14a.1456.0 Philip Hammond], House of Commons 14 May 2008
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  