text_body: --- DIVISION TITLE ---
  
  <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.i-iii.html"> Terrorism Bill</a> - <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.8-13.html#jE004"> Clause 8</a> - Attendance at a place used for Terrorist Training
  
  --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>Those voting Aye wished to add a new section to the end of <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.8-13.html#jE004"> Clause 8</a> of the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.i-iii.html#top"> Terrorism Bill</a>.</p>
  
  <p><a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/055/06055.8-13.html#jE004"> Clause 8</a> says, in summary: 
  
  <p class="indent">[A person commits an offence if he attends at any place where he could not reasonably have failed to understand that terrorism training is provided, whether or not he receives the training]</p>
  
  <p>By adding the <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2005-11-03a.1022.0"> provision</a> that: </p>
  
  <p class="indent">It shall be a defence [against this charge]... [if]... his attendance... was... [to prevent] the... training taking place, [to gather] information..., or involuntary.</p>
  
  <p>By leaving this out, an undercover reporter can be guilty even when exposing or informing on such practices.</p>
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  (put thoughts and notes for other researchers here)
  