text_body: --- MOTION EFFECT ---
  
  <p>The Aye-voters "insisted on" the results of the votes the day before in <a href="http://publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2005-03-09&number=127"> Division 127</a> and <a href="http://publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2005-03-09&number=128"> Division 128</a>, which evidently had been overturned in a debate in the House of Lords.</p>  
  
  <p>These threw away the requirements that the court which would oversee the process (of issuing Control Orders) would have its rules set by the Lord Chief Justice rather than the Lord Chancellor, and for the rules of the court to comply with <a href="http://www.hri.org/docs/ECHR50.html#C.Art6"> Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights</a> (right to hear charges brought against you, innocense until proven guilty, etc).</p>
  
  
  --- COMMENTS AND NOTES ---
  
  <p>Question accordingly agreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Lords amendment 33D disagreed to.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Amendments 33A to 33C agreed to.</p>
  
  <p><i>Lords Reasons:</i> 38A, 39A, 40A, 42D and 42E.</p>
  
  <p class="italic">Motion made, and Question put,</p>
  
  <p class="indent">That this House insists on its disagreement to Lords Nos. 38, 39 and 40, insists on its Nos. 42A and 42B, does not insist on its No. 42C, agrees to Lords No. 42D and disagrees with Lords No. 42E.&#8212;<i>[Ms Blears.]</i></p>
  
  <p><i>The House divided:</i> Ayes 323, Noes 219.</p>
  
  