motion_title: Online Safety Bill: New Clause 19 - Duties to protect news publisher content
motion_text: The Deputy Speaker put forthwith the Question already proposed from the Chair (Standing Order No. 83E), That the clause be read a Second time.
  
  Clause text:
  
  New Clause 19 - Duties to protect news publisher content
  (1) This section sets out the duties to protect news publisher content which apply in relation to Category 1 services.
  (2) Subject to subsections (4), (5) and (8), a duty, in relation to a service, to take the steps set out in subsection (3) before—
  (a) taking action in relation to content present on the service that is news publisher content, or
  (b) taking action against a user who is a recognised news publisher.
  (3) The steps referred to in subsection (2) are—
  (a) to give the recognised news publisher in question a notification which—
  (i) specifies the action that the provider is considering taking,
  (ii) gives reasons for that proposed action by reference to each relevant provision of the terms of service,
  (iii) where the proposed action relates to news publisher content that is also journalistic content, explains how the provider took the importance of the free expression of journalistic content into account when deciding on the proposed action, and
  (iv) specifies a reasonable period within which the recognised news publisher may make representations,
  (b) to consider any representations that are made, and
  (c) to notify the recognised news publisher of the decision and the reasons for it (addressing any representations made).
  (4) If a provider of a service reasonably considers that the provider would incur criminal or civil liability in relation to news publisher content present on the service if it were not taken down swiftly, the provider may take down that content without having taken the steps set out in subsection (3).
  (5) A provider of a service may also take down news publisher content present on the service without having taken the steps set out in subsection (3) if that content amounts to a relevant offence (see section 52 and also subsection (10) of this section).
  (6) Subject to subsection (8), if a provider takes action in relation to news publisher content or against a recognised news publisher without having taken the steps set out in subsection (3), a duty to take the steps set out in subsection (7).
  (7) The steps referred to in subsection (6) are—
  (a) to swiftly notify the recognised news publisher in question of the action taken, giving the provider’s justification for not having first taken the steps set out in subsection (3),
  (b) to specify a reasonable period within which the recognised news publisher may request that the action is reversed, and
  (c) if a request is made as mentioned in paragraph (b)—
  (i) to consider the request and whether the steps set out in subsection (3) should have been taken prior to the action being taken,
  (ii) if the provider concludes that those steps should have been taken, to swiftly reverse the action, and
  (iii) to notify the recognised news publisher of the decision and the reasons for it (addressing any reasons accompanying the request for reversal of the action).
  (8) If a recognised news publisher has been banned from using a service (and the ban is still in force), the provider of the service may take action in relation to news publisher content present on the service which was generated or originally published or broadcast by the recognised news publisher without complying with the duties set out in this section.
  (9) For the purposes of subsection (2)(a), a provider is not to be regarded as taking action in relation to news publisher content in the following circumstances—
  (a) a provider takes action in relation to content which is not news publisher content, that action affects related news publisher content, the grounds for the action only relate to the content which is not news publisher content, and it is not technically feasible for the action only to relate to the content which is not news publisher content;
  (b) a provider takes action against a user, and that action affects news publisher content that has been uploaded to or shared on the service by the user.
  (10) Section (Providers’ judgements about the status of content) (providers’ judgements about the status of content) applies in relation to judgements by providers about whether news publisher content amounts to a relevant offence as it applies in relation to judgements about whether content is illegal content.
  (11) OFCOM’s guidance under section (Guidance about illegal content judgements) (guidance about illegal content judgements) must include guidance about the matters dealt with in section (Providers’ judgements about the status of content) as that section applies by reason of subsection (10).
  (12) Any provision of the terms of service has effect subject to this section.
  (13) In this section—
  (a) references to “news publisher content” are to content that is news publisher content in relation to the service in question;
  (b) references to “taking action” in relation to content are to—
  (i) taking down content,
  (ii) restricting users’ access to content, or
  (iii) taking other action in relation to content (for example, adding warning labels to content);
  (c) references to “taking action” against a person are to giving a warning to a person, or suspending or banning a person from using a service, or in any way restricting a person’s ability to use a service.
  (14) Taking any step set out in subsection (3) or (7) does not count as “taking action” for the purposes of this section.
  (15) See—
  section 16 for the meaning of “journalistic content”;
  section 49 for the meaning of “news publisher content”;
  section 50 for the meaning of “recognised news publisher”.”—(Damian Collins.)