motion_title: Clause 21— Grounds of Proscription
motion_text: Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.
  As the Minister will know, an amendment to clause 21 was tabled but not selected. It dealt with the question of what constitutes unlawful glorification, which seems to depend on what glorification turns out to mean in the rest of the Bill. We believe that there are good grounds for proscribing an organisation that glorifies terrorist acts, because that is different from criminalising such an organisation, but I should like to understand better the nature of unlawful glorification and its relation to the   meaning of glorification in clause 1. I hope that the Minister will be able to enlighten us.